Kaempferol / CC(CDKs/cyclins) Cancer Research Results

KAE, Kaempferol: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:

Kaempferol — a naturally occurring dietary flavonol polyphenol (3,4′,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone) found in vegetables, fruits, tea, legumes, and medicinal plants, where it commonly occurs as glycosides rather than free aglycone. It is classified as a bioactive dietary flavonoid/flavonol and experimental natural-product therapeutic; common abbreviations include KMP, KPF, KF, and KAE. Major food sources include kale and other leafy vegetables, tea, broccoli, beans, onions, capers, and some fruits. Kaempferol is a multi-target compound with substantial preclinical anticancer and neuroprotective evidence, but it is not an approved anticancer or Alzheimer’s disease drug.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibition → suppression of proliferation and survival signaling, with induction of apoptosis and autophagy.
  2. Mitochondrial and death-receptor apoptosis → ↑ Bax/Bad/Bik, ↓ Bcl-2/Bcl-xL, ↑ mitochondrial permeability and cytochrome-c release, and activation of caspase-8/9/3 pathways.
  3. Cell-cycle suppression → G0/G1 or G2/M arrest depending on tumor model, with altered cyclins/CDKs and frequent participation of p53 signaling.
  4. MAPK and STAT signaling modulation → generally ↓ proliferative ERK/STAT3 signaling, while JNK/p38 effects are strongly model- and dose-dependent.
  5. NF-κB and inflammatory signaling suppression → ↓ pro-survival and inflammatory transcription, including context-dependent reductions in COX-2 and inflammatory mediators.
  6. ROS/redox modulation → frequently ↑ oxidative/mitochondrial stress in cancer cells at cytotoxic concentrations, while lower exposures in normal tissues commonly produce antioxidant and NRF2-dependent cytoprotection.
  7. Migration, EMT, invasion and angiogenesis inhibition → ↓ EGFR/Src/FAK signaling, MMP activity, HIF-1α/VEGF signaling and other metastatic programs in selected models.
  8. Metabolic suppression → inhibition of glycolysis, including PKM2-linked glycolytic metabolism in some tumor models, which can contribute to reversal of chemotherapy resistance.
  9. Ferroptosis modulation → emerging evidence indicates that kaempferol can promote ferroptotic tumor-cell death in selected cancers, while conversely suppressing pathological ferroptosis in non-cancer tissues; direction is therefore highly context-dependent.
  10. Epigenetic modulation → direct broad HDAC inhibition has been demonstrated experimentally at micromolar concentrations and may contribute to altered transcription and growth suppression.
  11. Therapy sensitization → increased responsiveness to radiation, cisplatin, TRAIL and other anticancer treatments has been demonstrated preclinically through PI3K/AKT, mitochondrial apoptosis, metabolic and drug-resistance mechanisms.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Oral kaempferol is absorbed but undergoes extensive intestinal and hepatic conjugation, particularly glucuronidation and sulfation, so circulating material is predominantly metabolites rather than free aglycone. In a human study using 9 mg dietary kaempferol, mean plasma Cmax was approximately 0.1 µM at about 5.8 hours, with kaempferol-3-glucuronide the major circulating form. Food matrix, glycoside structure, microbiota and formulation substantially influence exposure. Nanoformulations, lipid carriers and related delivery approaches are being investigated to improve systemic exposure but remain experimental for oncology.
-research options to improve bioavailability include: take with oil (not water soluble), add Lecithin. Examples: extra virgin olive oil, nuts, egg yolk
-consuming kaempferol from kale, broccoli, onions or similar foods, most of it is present as glycosides, so mostly dependent on gut microbiota (not oil, etc)

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Most direct anticancer studies use approximately 10–100 µM kaempferol; reported IC50 values are often around 20–60 µM depending on tumor type. These concentrations generally exceed the sub-µM systemic concentrations observed after ordinary dietary exposure. Consequently, many direct cytotoxic, HDAC-inhibitory, ROS-generating and ferroptotic effects should not be assumed to occur systemically after normal dietary intake. Local gastrointestinal exposure and specialized formulations may provide different exposure conditions.
-Human dietary exposure generally produces circulating kaempferol concentrations in the nanomolar to low-submicromolar range; plasma Cmax of approximately 0.1 µM has been reported after a 9-mg dietary dose. Therefore, in-vitro exposures of 10–20 µM are roughly two orders of magnitude above concentrations demonstrated after ordinary dietary intake.

Clinical evidence status: Preclinical. Anticancer evidence consists predominantly of cell-culture and animal studies, including xenograft studies and preclinical radiosensitization/chemosensitization. There is no established therapeutic oncology indication and no convincing cancer-treatment RCT evidence for kaempferol itself. Human evidence includes epidemiologic dietary associations, pharmacokinetic studies and a small randomized safety study in healthy adults; 50 mg/day kaempferol aglycone for four weeks was well tolerated in that study. Clinical efficacy for cancer remains unproven.


Kaempferol Mechanistic Effects

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 PI3K AKT mTOR ↓ PI3K; ↓ AKT; ↓ mTOR ↔ / context-dependent R–G ↓ survival and proliferation; ↑ apoptosis and autophagy One of the most reproducible anticancer axes; direct PI3K inhibition has been demonstrated experimentally.
2 Mitochondrial and death receptor apoptosis ↑ Bax/Bad/Bik; ↓ Bcl-2/Bcl-xL; ↑ Cyt-c; ↑ caspase-8/9/3 ↔ at lower exposure R–G ↑ programmed cell death Both intrinsic mitochondrial and extrinsic death-receptor pathways can participate.
3 Cell cycle and p53 ↑ p53 (model-dependent); ↑ G0/G1 or G2/M arrest G ↓ proliferation Exact checkpoint depends strongly on cancer type and exposure.
4 MAPK and STAT signaling ↓ ERK; ↓ STAT3; JNK/p38 ↔ (context-dependent) ↔ / protective MAPK modulation R–G ↓ proliferative signaling; ↑ apoptosis JNK and p38 direction is not uniform across models and should not be assigned a universal direction.
5 NF-κB inflammatory survival signaling ↓ NF-κB; ↓ p65; ↓ inflammatory and anti-apoptotic transcription ↓ pathological inflammation R–G Anti-inflammatory and anti-survival activity Potentially relevant to both tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment.
6 Mitochondrial ROS and NRF2 redox response ↑ ROS (dose-dependent); NRF2 ↔ (context-dependent) ↓ ROS; ↑ NRF2 (context-dependent) P–G Tumor oxidative stress versus normal-cell cytoprotection Biphasic redox behavior is important: pro-oxidant anticancer effects generally require substantially higher exposure than dietary systemic exposure.
7 EGFR EMT migration and angiogenesis ↓ EGFR/Src/ERK/AKT; ↓ FAK; ↓ MMPs; ↓ migration; ↓ VEGF G ↓ invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis Evidence is predominantly preclinical and varies among tumor types.
8 Glycolytic metabolism ↓ PKM2; ↓ glycolysis; ↓ lactate production (model-dependent) R–G ↓ tumor bioenergetics and drug resistance Particularly relevant to reported reversal of 5-FU resistance; not yet established as a universal kaempferol mechanism.
9 Ferroptosis ↑ ferroptosis (model-dependent) ↓ pathological ferroptosis (context-dependent) R–G Redox-dependent cell death modulation Emerging cancer evidence includes CA9-associated ferroptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma; direction reverses in some neuroprotective models.
10 HDAC epigenetic regulation ↓ HDAC activity; ↑ histone acetylation ↔; toxicity at high concentration G Epigenetic growth suppression Pan-HDAC inhibition has been demonstrated in vitro; translational relevance is constrained by the micromolar exposure required.
11 Radio and chemosensitization ↑ radiation response; ↑ cisplatin/TRAIL response; ↓ resistance mechanisms ↔ / relative sparing in some models G Adjunct anticancer potential Demonstrated in cell and animal experiments but not established clinically.
12 Clinical Translation Constraint Required cytotoxic concentrations commonly exceed systemic dietary exposure Dietary and short-term supplemental exposures appear considerably better tolerated G PK and clinical-evidence limitation Rapid conjugation, low free-aglycone exposure, heterogeneous mechanisms and absence of therapeutic oncology trials remain major barriers.

TSF: P: 0–30 min    R: 30 min–3 hr    G: >3 hr



Alzheimer’s disease: Kaempferol has substantial preclinical neuroprotective evidence in cellular and animal models of Alzheimer’s disease and sporadic dementia, but no established human therapeutic efficacy. Reported mechanisms include ↓ oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, ↓ Aβ-associated toxicity and deposition, ↓ neuronal apoptosis, modulation of AChE, improvement of synaptic/neurotrophic signaling, and suppression of pathological neuronal ferroptosis. Recent evidence implicates NRF2/HO-1/GPX4-associated antioxidant and ferroptosis-control pathways. Cognitive and memory improvements have been reported in several rodent models; these findings have not yet been validated in clinical AD trials.

Kaempferol in Alzheimer’s Disease

Rank Pathway / Axis Modulation Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Oxidative stress and NRF2 defense ↓ ROS/lipid oxidation; ↑ NRF2/HO-1 antioxidant signaling Neuronal protection One of the most consistently reported mechanisms across preclinical AD models.
2 Aβ pathology ↓ Aβ toxicity/deposition ↓ amyloid-associated neuronal injury Demonstrated in cellular and animal models; clinical relevance remains unknown.
3 Neuroinflammation ↓ inflammatory signaling ↓ neuronal inflammatory stress Likely overlaps with NF-κB and oxidative-stress modulation.
4 Neuronal ferroptosis ↓ Fe²⁺; ↓ lipid ROS; ↑ GPX4/SLC7A11/AKR1C3-associated defense ↓ ferroptotic neuronal death Emerging evidence; contrasts with pro-ferroptotic effects reported in certain cancer models.
5 Tau pathology ↓ phosphorylated Tau (model-dependent) ↓ neurodegenerative pathology Recent animal evidence; replication and human validation are required.
6 Acetylcholinesterase ↓ AChE (preclinical) Potential ↑ cholinergic signaling Evidence is substantially weaker than for approved AChE inhibitors and should not imply comparable clinical efficacy.
7 Cognition and memory ↑ learning; ↑ memory performance Functional neuroprotection Observed in several rodent models; no established human AD efficacy.


CC(CDKs/cyclins), Cell cycle (CDKs/cyclins): Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj(attenuate) TCGA
Type:
Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are key regulators of the cell cycle, and their dysregulation is a common feature in many cancers.
The cell cycle consists of several phases:
G1 Phase (Gap 1): The cell grows and prepares for DNA synthesis.
S Phase (Synthesis): DNA is replicated.
G2 Phase (Gap 2): The cell prepares for mitosis.
M Phase (Mitosis): The cell divides into two daughter cells.

Open menu
Cdh1 and E-cadherin are they the same thing

Cdh1 and E-cadherin refer to the same protein. Cdh1 is the gene that encodes E-cadherin, which is a type of cadherin, a family of proteins involved in cell-cell adhesion. E-cadherin plays a crucial role in maintaining the structure and integrity of tissues by facilitating adhesion between epithelial cells. It is particularly important in the context of development and in the maintenance of epithelial tissue architecture. In summary, Cdh1 is the gene name, while E-cadherin is the protein product of that gene.

CDK1/2/5/9 role in cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are a family of protein kinases that play essential roles in regulating the cell cycle, transcription, and other cellular processes. CDK1, CDK2, CDK5, and CDK9 have been implicated in cancer through various mechanisms:

CDK1:
Role: Primarily involved in the regulation of the cell cycle, particularly the transition from G2 phase to mitosis.
Cancer Implication: Overexpression or hyperactivation of CDK1 can lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation and is often associated with various cancers, including breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. CDK1 inhibitors are being explored as potential cancer therapies.
CDK2:
Role: Functions mainly in the G1 to S phase transition of the cell cycle, working closely with cyclins D and E.
Cancer Implication: CDK2 is often overexpressed in cancer cells, contributing to tumorigenesis by promoting cell cycle progression. Inhibition of CDK2 has been studied as a therapeutic strategy in cancers such as ovarian and breast cancer.
CDK5:
Role: Unlike other CDKs, CDK5 is primarily involved in neuronal function and is activated by p35 and p39. It plays roles in neuronal development and synaptic function. Cancer Implication: CDK5 has been implicated in certain cancers, particularly in the context of neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumors. Its role in cancer is complex, as it can promote or inhibit tumor growth depending on the context and the specific cancer type.
CDK9:
Role: Part of the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) complex, CDK9 is involved in regulating transcription by phosphorylating the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Cancer Implication: CDK9 is often overexpressed in various cancers, leading to increased transcription of genes that promote cell survival and proliferation. Inhibitors of CDK9 are being investigated as potential cancer therapies, particularly in hematological malignancies. In summary, CDK1, CDK2, CDK5, and CDK9 each play distinct roles in cell cycle regulation and transcription, and their dysregulation is associated with various cancer types. Targeting these kinases with specific inhibitors is an area of active research in cancer therapy.


CDK4 and CDK6 are cyclin-dependent kinases that play crucial roles in regulating the cell cycle, particularly the transition from the G1 phase to the S phase. Their activity is tightly regulated by cyclins, specifically cyclin D, and they are essential for cell proliferation. Here’s how CDK4 and CDK6 are implicated in cancer:

Role in Cell Cycle Regulation
CDK4/6 Function: CDK4 and CDK6, when activated by cyclin D, phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (Rb). This phosphorylation leads to the release of E2F transcription factors, which promote the expression of genes necessary for DNA synthesis and progression into the S phase of the cell cycle. Implications in Cancer
Overexpression and Dysregulation: In many cancers, CDK4 and CDK6 are often overexpressed or hyperactivated, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation. This dysregulation can result from various factors, including mutations in cyclins, loss of tumor suppressor genes (like Rb), or amplification of the CDK4/6 genes themselves.
Breast Cancer: CDK4/6 is particularly well-studied in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. In these cancers, the overactivity of CDK4/6 contributes to tumor growth and progression. Other Cancers: CDK4/6 has also been implicated in other cancers, including melanoma, lung cancer, and certain hematological malignancies.
Therapeutic Targeting
CDK4/6 Inhibitors: The discovery of the role of CDK4 and CDK6 in cancer has led to the development of specific inhibitors, such as palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. These drugs have shown efficacy in treating hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, often in combination with endocrine therapies (like aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen).
Mechanism of Action: By inhibiting CDK4/6, these drugs prevent the phosphorylation of Rb, thereby blocking the cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase, leading to reduced cell proliferation and increased apoptosis in cancer cells.
Conclusion
CDK4 and CDK6 are critical regulators of the cell cycle, and their dysregulation is a common feature in various cancers. Targeting these kinases with specific inhibitors has become a promising therapeutic strategy, particularly in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and ongoing research continues to explore their role in other malignancies.

Cell cycle (CDKs/cyclins) and cancer

The cell cycle is a tightly regulated series of events that lead to cell division and replication. Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are key regulators of the cell cycle, and their dysregulation is a common feature in many cancers. Here’s an overview of how CDKs and cyclins function in the cell cycle and their implications in cancer:

Cell Cycle Phases
The cell cycle consists of several phases:

G1 Phase (Gap 1): The cell grows and prepares for DNA synthesis.
S Phase (Synthesis): DNA is replicated.
G2 Phase (Gap 2): The cell prepares for mitosis.
M Phase (Mitosis): The cell divides into two daughter cells.
Role of CDKs and Cyclins
Cyclins: These are regulatory proteins whose levels fluctuate throughout the cell cycle. They activate CDKs by binding to them, forming cyclin-CDK complexes that drive the cell cycle forward. CDKs: These are serine/threonine kinases that, when activated by cyclins, phosphorylate target proteins to regulate various processes, including:
Progression through the cell cycle.
DNA replication.
Mitotic entry and exit.
Key CDKs and Their Functions
CDK1: Regulates the transition from G2 to M phase.
CDK2: Involved in the G1 to S phase transition.
CDK4 and CDK6: Work with cyclin D to promote progression through the G1 phase.
CDK2: Also works with cyclin E to facilitate the G1/S transition.
FRO9: Involved in transcriptional regulation and elongation.
Overexpression: Many cancers exhibit overexpression of cyclins (e.g., cyclin D1) or CDKs (e.g., CDK4/6), leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation.


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
8072- KAE,    Natural defense against colorectal cancer: the effects of kaempferol on epigenetics, apoptosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell proliferation
- Review, CRC, NA
AntiCan↑, TumCP↓, TumCI↓, Inflam↓, angioG↓, ROS↑, Apoptosis↑, ChemoSen↑, Risk↓, *antiOx↑, *Inflam↓, *AntiBio↑, *cardioP↑, *neuroP↑, selectivity↑, PUMA↑, Cyt‑c↑, cl‑Casp3↑, cl‑PARP↑, Apoptosis↑, NF-kB↓, COX2/PTGS2↓, CC(CDKs/cyclins)↓, TumCCA↑, BioAv↓, eff↑, DR4↑, DR5↑, Casp3↑, Casp9↑, Casp7↑, TumCP↓, TumCI↓, TumAuto↑, mtDam↑, P53↑, MAPK↑, *lipid-P↓, *TAC↑, *Catalase↑, *SOD↑, *GPx↑, *NRF2↑,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

ROS↑, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics(tgid=3)

mtDam↑, 1,  

Cell Death(tgid=5)

Apoptosis↑, 2,   Casp3↑, 1,   cl‑Casp3↑, 1,   Casp7↑, 1,   Casp9↑, 1,   Cyt‑c↑, 1,   DR4↑, 1,   DR5↑, 1,   MAPK↑, 1,   PUMA↑, 1,  

Autophagy & Lysosomes(tgid=9)

TumAuto↑, 1,  

DNA Damage & Repair(tgid=10)

P53↑, 1,   cl‑PARP↑, 1,  

Cell Cycle & Senescence(tgid=11)

TumCCA↑, 1,  

Migration(tgid=13)

CC(CDKs/cyclins)↓, 1,   TumCI↓, 2,   TumCP↓, 2,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature(tgid=14)

angioG↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling(tgid=16)

COX2/PTGS2↓, 1,   Inflam↓, 1,   NF-kB↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance(tgid=21)

BioAv↓, 1,   ChemoSen↑, 1,   eff↑, 1,   selectivity↑, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23)

AntiCan↑, 1,   Risk↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 29

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


NA, unassigned(tgid=0)

AntiBio↑, 1,  

Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

antiOx↑, 1,   Catalase↑, 1,   GPx↑, 1,   lipid-P↓, 1,   NRF2↑, 1,   SOD↑, 1,   TAC↑, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling(tgid=16)

Inflam↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23)

cardioP↑, 1,   neuroP↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 11

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: CC(CDKs/cyclins), Cell cycle (CDKs/cyclins)
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:316  Target#:55  State#:%  Dir#:1
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page