Beta-Caryophyllene / TumCI Cancer Research Results

BCP, Beta-Caryophyllene: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:

β-Caryophyllene is a dietary sesquiterpene and CB2 agonist with preclinical anticancer evidence, including apoptosis induction, reduced proliferation, anti-angiogenesis, reduced invasion/migration, and chemo/radio-sensitization. Evidence is promising but remains mainly in-vitro and animal-based; clinical cancer validation is lacking.
-naturally occurring sesquiterpene found in many plant essential oils: black pepper, clove oil ...
-binds selectively to the CB2 receptors(modulates up) and not the CB1 receptor, which makes it non-psychoactive and therapeutically appealing.

-Ylang-Ylang leaves have been found to contain the highest concentration of BCP (52%)
-black pepper, 30% BCP in its fruit-derived essential oil.
-leaves of the tropical tree Spondias pinnata yield 49.9% BCP
-Pimpinella kotschyana, a Mediterranean herb, was found to contain 49.9% BCP in its seeds
-Sumac fruits contain 34.3% BCP
-clove buds contain 20–30% BCP in their essential oil
-certain cannabis strains, flowers can produce BCP concentrations of approximately 30%
-sugar apples leaves contain 22.9% BCP

Beta-Caryophyllene — β-Caryophyllene is a plant-derived bicyclic sesquiterpene hydrocarbon and dietary cannabinoid with selective functional agonism at cannabinoid receptor type 2. It is formally classified as a natural sesquiterpene terpene, food flavoring compound, and investigational phytochemical adjunct rather than an approved anticancer drug. Standard abbreviations include BCP, β-CP, and sometimes trans-caryophyllene. It occurs in multiple essential oils, especially black pepper, clove, copaiba, oregano, hops, rosemary, and Cannabis sativa chemotypes, but its database identity should be the purified compound rather than a whole-oil product.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. CB2-centered anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory signaling, with low CB1 activity and therefore no intrinsic THC-like psychoactive classification.
  2. Suppression of pro-survival oncogenic signaling, especially PI3K/Akt/mTOR, STAT3, NF-κB, and related proliferation or survival pathways in cancer models.
  3. Induction of mitochondrial apoptosis through Bax/Bcl-2 shift, caspase activation, mitochondrial stress, and cell-cycle arrest in several cancer cell lines.
  4. Anti-angiogenic and anti-migratory activity, including inhibition of endothelial migration, tube formation, VEGF-linked responses, EMT, invasion, and metastasis-associated phenotypes.
  5. Chemosensitization, mainly preclinical, reported with cisplatin and other cytotoxic or targeted agents; mechanism appears context-dependent and partly linked to apoptosis and resistance-pathway modulation.
  6. Radiosensitization, currently preliminary and model-dependent, with recent colorectal cancer cell evidence involving PPARγ-mediated apoptosis.
  7. ROS/NRF2 modulation is secondary and context-dependent: BCP can promote oxidative stress in cancer-cell apoptosis models, while in normal injury models it more often shows cytoprotective antioxidant and NRF2-linked effects.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: BCP is highly lipophilic and formulation-sensitive; oral exposure is limited and variable with conventional dosing, while self-emulsifying lipid formulations can substantially improve human systemic exposure. PK relevance is high because many in-vitro anticancer concentrations are unlikely to be reproduced by normal dietary intake.

Delivery constraints: The key delivery constraints are volatility, hydrophobicity, oxidation/stability, low aqueous solubility, food-matrix dependence, and the likely need for lipid, nanoemulsion, SEDDS, or other formulation strategies if systemic pharmacology is the goal.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Most anticancer assays use micromolar-to-high-micromolar or µg/mL concentrations; these should be interpreted cautiously because common in-vitro levels likely exceed exposures achievable from culinary intake. Formulated oral BCP may improve exposure, but clinical anticancer target engagement has not been established.

Clinical evidence status: Preclinical oncology evidence is moderate and spans cell, endothelial, and animal models; human evidence is small and mostly non-oncology or PK-focused. No validated clinical cancer efficacy evidence was found. Best database status is preclinical / investigational adjunct, with possible chemosensitizer and anti-angiogenic tags marked as preclinical.

Beta-Caryophyllene Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 CB2 receptor signaling CB2 engagement may shift inflammatory and survival signaling ↓ (context-dependent) CB2-mediated inflammation ↓ with low CB1 psychoactivity R/G Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory signaling Core pharmacologic identity of BCP; direct anticancer dependence on CB2 varies by model.
2 PI3K Akt mTOR STAT3 survival signaling PI3K/Akt/mTOR ↓; STAT3 ↓; proliferation ↓; survival ↓ Usually cytoprotective or neutral at lower exposure (context-dependent) R/G Growth suppression and apoptosis sensitization Central anticancer axis across bladder, ovarian, lung, and other cell models; not yet clinically validated.
3 Mitochondrial apoptosis Bax ↑; Bcl-2 ↓; caspase-3 ↑; mitochondrial stress ↑; apoptosis ↑ In injury models, mitochondrial dysfunction often ↓ G Intrinsic apoptotic cell death Strong recurring preclinical mechanism; cancer selectivity depends on dose and model.
4 Angiogenesis and endothelial migration VEGF-linked angiogenesis ↓; invasion ↓; migration ↓ Endothelial migration and tube formation ↓ (model-dependent) G Anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic pressure Important for colorectal xenograft and endothelial assay interpretation; may be therapeutically relevant but exposure-limited.
5 NF-κB inflammatory signaling NF-κB-linked survival and cytokine tone ↓ (context-dependent) Inflammatory cytokine signaling ↓ R/G Inflammation-linked tumor support reduction More robust as an anti-inflammatory mechanism than as a standalone cancer-killing mechanism.
6 ROS and mitochondrial oxidative stress ROS ↑ can contribute to apoptosis (high concentration only) Oxidative stress ↓ in many toxic injury models R/G Context-dependent redox modulation antioxidant or pro-oxidant; direction depends on cell type, injury context, and concentration.
7 NRF2 cytoprotection ↔ or context-dependent; may be undesirable if it protects malignant cells NRF2/HO-1/NQO1 ↑ in injury-protection models G Secondary antioxidant-response modulation NRF2 is not a core anticancer mechanism for BCP; tag as secondary/contextual rather than primary.
8 Chemosensitization Cisplatin response ↑; apoptosis ↑; resistance signaling ↓ (model-dependent) Normal-cell toxicity data are insufficient for oncology combinations G Adjunct sensitization Preclinical evidence supports a sensitizer hypothesis, but there is no clinical cancer validation.
9 Radiosensitization Radiation response ↑ in colorectal cancer cells (model-dependent) Normal-tissue radioprotection versus radiosensitization is unresolved G Potential radiation adjunct Recent evidence is early and should be tagged as preliminary, not established.
10 Glycolysis and HIF-1α ↔ limited direct oncology evidence ↔ not a primary established axis G Not a core mechanism Do not add strong HIF-1α or glycolysis tags unless future product-specific cancer evidence supports them.
11 Clinical Translation Constraint Effective in-vitro exposure may exceed practical dietary exposure Food-use safety does not establish therapeutic-dose safety G PK and evidence limitation Key constraints are bioavailability, formulation, dose, tissue exposure, cancer-type heterogeneity, and lack of oncology trials.

TSF legend: P: 0–30 min; R: 30 min–3 hr; G: >3 hr



TumCI, Tumor Cell invasion: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Tumor cell invasion is a critical process in cancer progression and metastasis, where cancer cells spread from the primary tumor to surrounding tissues and distant organs. This process involves several key steps and mechanisms:

1.Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT): Many tumors originate from epithelial cells, which are typically organized in layers. During EMT, these cells lose their epithelial characteristics (such as cell-cell adhesion) and gain mesenchymal traits (such as increased motility). This transition is crucial for invasion.

2.Degradation of Extracellular Matrix (ECM): Tumor cells secrete enzymes, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), that degrade the ECM, allowing cancer cells to invade surrounding tissues. This degradation facilitates the movement of cancer cells through the tissue.

3.Cell Migration: Once the ECM is degraded, cancer cells can migrate. They often use various mechanisms, including amoeboid movement and mesenchymal migration, to move through the tissue. This migration is influenced by various signaling pathways and the tumor microenvironment.

4.Angiogenesis: As tumors grow, they require a blood supply to provide nutrients and oxygen. Tumor cells can stimulate the formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) through the release of growth factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This not only supports tumor growth but also provides a route for cancer cells to enter the bloodstream.

5.Invasion into Blood Vessels (Intravasation): Cancer cells can invade nearby blood vessels, allowing them to enter the circulatory system. This step is crucial for metastasis, as it enables cancer cells to travel to distant sites in the body.

6.Survival in Circulation: Once in the bloodstream, cancer cells must survive the immune response and the shear stress of blood flow. They can form clusters with platelets or other cells to evade detection.

7.Extravasation and Colonization: After traveling through the bloodstream, cancer cells can exit the circulation (extravasation) and invade new tissues. They may then establish secondary tumors (metastases) in distant organs.

8.Tumor Microenvironment: The surrounding microenvironment plays a significant role in tumor invasion. Factors such as immune cells, fibroblasts, and signaling molecules can either promote or inhibit invasion and metastasis.


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
6513- BCP,    β-Caryophyllene oxide potentiates TNFα-induced apoptosis and inhibits invasion through down-modulation of NF-κB-regulated gene products
Apoptosis↑, TumCG↓, TumMeta↓, STAT3↓, PI3K↓, Akt↓, mTOR↓, ChemoSen↑, IAP1↓, IAP2↓, Bcl-2↓, Bcl-xL↓, survivin↓, COX2↓, cycD1/CCND1↓, cMyc↓, TumCI↓, MMP9↓, ICAM-1↓, angioG↓, VEGF↓, NF-kB↓,
6503- BCP,    The Potential Therapeutic Role of Beta-Caryophyllene as a Chemosensitizer and an Inhibitor of Angiogenesis in Cancer
- Review, Var, NA
ChemoSen↑, angioG↓, TumCI↓, TumMeta↓, ROS↑, *ROS↓, chemoP↑, CB2 / CNR2↑, Inflam↓, AntiTum↑, *BioAv↑, *BBB↑, Apoptosis↑, TumCP↑, TumCCA↑, RadioS↑, DNArepair↓, ROS↑, STAT3↓, *BioEnh↑, Pain↓, AntiBio↓, ROS↑, Dose↝, NF-kB↓, MAPK↓, TNF-α↓, IL1β↓, IL6↓, cl‑PARP↑, Casp↑, BAX↑, Bcl-2↓, VEGF↓, VEGFR2↓, MMP2↓, p‑p38↓, p‑ERK↓, EPR↑, P-gp↓, MRP1/ABCC1↓, *NRF2↑, *antiOx↑,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 2 of 2

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 2

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


NA, unassigned(tgid=0)

AntiBio↓, 1,  

Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

ROS↑, 3,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis(tgid=4)

cMyc↓, 1,  

Cell Death(tgid=5)

Akt↓, 1,   Apoptosis↑, 2,   BAX↑, 1,   Bcl-2↓, 2,   Bcl-xL↓, 1,   Casp↑, 1,   IAP1↓, 1,   IAP2↓, 1,   MAPK↓, 1,   p‑p38↓, 1,   survivin↓, 1,  

DNA Damage & Repair(tgid=10)

DNArepair↓, 1,   cl‑PARP↑, 1,  

Cell Cycle & Senescence(tgid=11)

cycD1/CCND1↓, 1,   TumCCA↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State(tgid=12)

p‑ERK↓, 1,   mTOR↓, 1,   PI3K↓, 1,   STAT3↓, 2,   TumCG↓, 1,  

Migration(tgid=13)

MMP2↓, 1,   MMP9↓, 1,   TumCI↓, 2,   TumCP↑, 1,   TumMeta↓, 2,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature(tgid=14)

angioG↓, 2,   EPR↑, 1,   VEGF↓, 2,   VEGFR2↓, 1,  

Barriers & Transport(tgid=15)

P-gp↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling(tgid=16)

CB2 / CNR2↑, 1,   COX2↓, 1,   ICAM-1↓, 1,   IL1β↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,   Inflam↓, 1,   NF-kB↓, 2,   TNF-α↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance(tgid=21)

ChemoSen↑, 2,   Dose↝, 1,   MRP1/ABCC1↓, 1,   RadioS↑, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers(tgid=22)

IL6↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23)

AntiTum↑, 1,   chemoP↑, 1,   Pain↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 49

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

antiOx↑, 1,   NRF2↑, 1,   ROS↓, 1,  

Barriers & Transport(tgid=15)

BBB↑, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance(tgid=21)

BioAv↑, 1,   BioEnh↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 6

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: TumCI, Tumor Cell invasion
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:401  Target#:324  State#:%  Dir#:1
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page