Auranofin / Hif1a Cancer Research Results

AF, Auranofin: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:

Auranofin — an orally administered gold(I) coordination complex (gold–phosphine–thiolate “thiosugar” drug) originally approved as a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for rheumatoid arthritis and widely studied for repurposing as a redox-targeted anticancer and anti-infective agent. It is a small-molecule metallodrug whose pharmacology is typically tracked via blood/plasma gold concentrations because intact auranofin is rapidly transformed and not reliably detected in blood. Standard abbreviation(s): AF (auranofin); primary target shorthand: TrxR/TxNRD (thioredoxin reductase).

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Thioredoxin reductase (TXNRD1/TXNRD2; TrxR) inhibition by gold(I) → thioredoxin system suppression and loss of redox-buffering capacity
  2. ROS and redox stress escalation (secondary to TrxR blockade; often NAC-reversible in models) → apoptosis and other regulated death programs
  3. Mitochondrial dysfunction (Δψm collapse, bioenergetic stress) coupled to redox imbalance
  4. Proteostasis stress (ER stress/UPR; proteasome involvement in selected contexts) → non-apoptotic death phenotypes (model-dependent)
  5. Ferroptosis contribution in subsets of models (lipid peroxidation–dependent; context-dependent)
  6. Radiosensitization / chemosensitization via impaired antioxidant recovery and enhanced oxidative injury (context-dependent)
  7. Stress-response transcription (e.g., NRF2 activation as an adaptive resistance program in some settings; protective in normal cells)

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Oral absorption is incomplete; clinical PK is commonly described as ~25% of the gold content absorbed. Gold is highly protein-bound and exhibits prolonged retention/long terminal half-life, so effective exposure depends strongly on dose and dosing duration. Because “gold levels” are the main measurable surrogate, cross-study comparisons should specify matrix (whole blood vs plasma) and timing (steady-state vs short course).

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Many oncology cell studies use ~0.5–5 µM AF. Human short-course data at 6 mg/day for 7 days report plasma gold on the order of ~0.1–0.3 µg/mL (roughly sub-µM to ~1–1.5 µM range when expressed as gold equivalents), meaning lower in-vitro ranges can overlap clinically observed exposure surrogates, while higher µM regimens may exceed typical oral exposures unless higher doses/longer courses or formulation changes are used.

Clinical evidence status: Approved for rheumatoid arthritis (historical DMARD use) but oncology use remains investigational. Multiple early-phase repurposing trials exist across hematologic and solid tumors; several completed studies have limited publicly posted outcomes, and there is no established standard-of-care anticancer indication.


Pathways:
1.Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR) Inhibition.
- Most widely recognized for potently inhibiting TrxR.
2.Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Oxidative Stress.
3.MMP depolarization, release of cytochrome c
4.Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress and Unfolded Protein Response (UPR)
5.Inhibition of Pro-survival Pathways (e.g., NF-κB Signaling)

-ic50 for cancer typically 1-3uM, normal cell 5-10uM or higher.
-Several studies animal testing antitumor efficacy have used doses in the region of 5–8 mg/kg via intraperitoneal injection or oral administration.

-Auranofin’s anticancer activity is often linked to its inhibition of thioredoxin reductase, leading to increased oxidative stress.

Mechanistic axes for Auranofin (Cancer vs Normal)

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 TXNRD1 TXNRD2 Thioredoxin system ↓ (primary) ↓ (primary) P→R Collapse of thioredoxin redox buffering Core, proximal target of AF; downstream effects track with redox reserve and compensatory antioxidant capacity rather than tumor lineage alone.
2 ROS redox stress ↑ (often primary downstream) ↑ (dose-dependent) P→R Oxidative injury signaling and death pathway engagement Frequently reversible with thiol antioxidants (e.g., NAC) in models, supporting causality; magnitude depends on baseline redox fragility.
3 Mitochondria bioenergetics Δψm ↓, ATP stress ↑ (context-dependent) Δψm ↓ (dose-dependent) R Energetic crisis and intrinsic death susceptibility Often coupled to redox imbalance; can amplify apoptosis/regulated necrosis depending on cellular checkpoints.
4 Proteostasis ER stress UPR ↑ (model-dependent) ↔/↑ (high exposure only) R→G Protein-folding overload and non-apoptotic death phenotypes Some reports implicate proteasome participation and paraptosis-like outcomes; not universal across tumor types.
5 NRF2 antioxidant response ↑ (adaptive; resistance role) ↑ (cytoprotective) R→G Transcriptional compensation to redox stress NRF2 induction can blunt AF efficacy in tumors yet protect normal tissues; net effect is (context-dependent).
6 Ferroptosis lipid peroxidation ↑ (model-dependent) ↔/↑ (stress-prone contexts) R→G Regulated death component in subsets Most consistent when AF-driven redox stress converges on lipid ROS handling; requires model-specific validation.
7 Radiosensitization chemosensitization ↑ sensitivity (context-dependent) ↑ toxicity risk (context-dependent) R→G Impaired antioxidant recovery increases treatment injury Mechanistically coherent with TrxR blockade; best supported where oxidative damage markers and combination indices are shown.
8 Ca²⁺ stress coupling ↑/↔ (secondary) ↑/↔ (secondary) R Amplifies ER mitochondrial death signaling Usually downstream of redox + organelle perturbation; include when Ca²⁺-dependent apoptosis/ER stress is explicitly demonstrated.
9 Glycolysis ATP production ↓ (context-dependent) ↔/↓ (high exposure only) R Metabolic stress that can reduce proliferative fitness Reported in some models; may be secondary to mitochondrial/redox disruption rather than a primary binding target.
10 HIF-1α hypoxia programs ↔ (model-dependent) ↔ G Context marker rather than core axis Evaluate case-by-case; AF’s primary leverage is redox enzyme inhibition, with HIF effects emerging indirectly in some systems.
11 Clinical Translation Constraint ↔ ↔ — Exposure, tolerability, and selectivity limit window Oral absorption is incomplete and gold is long-retained/protein-bound; many oncology studies rely on µM in-vitro dosing that may exceed typical oral exposure surrogates. Oncology trials exist but anticancer efficacy is not established as standard-of-care.

TSF legend: P: 0–30 min | R: 30 min–3 hr | G: >3 hr
Hif1a, HIF1α/HIF1a: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Hypoxia-Inducible-Factor 1A (HIF1A gene, HIF1α, HIF-1α protein product)
-Dominantly expressed under hypoxia(low oxygen levels) in solid tumor cells
-HIF1A induces the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
-High HIF-1α expression is associated with Poor prognosis
-Low HIF-1α expression is associated with Better prognosis

-Functionally, HIF-1α is reported to regulate glycolysis, whilst HIF-2α regulates genes associated with lipoprotein metabolism.
-Cancer cells produce HIF in response to hypoxia in order to generate more VEGF that promote angiogenesis

Key mediators of aerobic glycolysis regulated by HIF-1α.
-GLUT-1 → regulation of the flux of glucose into cells.
-HK2 → catalysis of the first step of glucose metabolism.
-PKM2 → regulation of rate-limiting step of glycolysis.
-Phosphorylation of PDH complex by PDK → blockage of OXPHOS and promotion of aerobic glycolysis.
-LDH (LDHA): Rapid ATP production, conversion of pyruvate to lactate;

HIF-1α Inhibitors:
-Curcumin: disruption of signaling pathways that stabilize HIF-1α (ie downregulate).
-Resveratrol: downregulate HIF-1α protein accumulation under hypoxic conditions.
-EGCG: modulation of upstream signaling pathways, leading to decreased HIF-1α activity.
-Emodin: reduce HIF-1α expression. (under hypoxia).
-Apigenin: inhibit HIF-1α accumulation.
Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
5468- AF,    The gold complex auranofin: new perspectives for cancer therapy
- Review, Var, NA
TrxR↓, ROS↑, eff↑, Apoptosis↑, TumCG↓, TumCP↓, Akt↓, NF-kB↓, DNAdam↑, eff↝, eff↓, PI3K↓, Akt↓, mTOR↓, Hif1a↓, VEGF↓, Casp3↑, CSCs↓, ATP↓, Glycolysis↓, eff↑, eff↑, MMP↓, AIF↑, toxicity↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

ROS↑, 1,   TrxR↓, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics ⓘ

AIF↑, 1,   ATP↓, 1,   MMP↓, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

Glycolysis↓, 1,  

Cell Death ⓘ

Akt↓, 2,   Apoptosis↑, 1,   Casp3↑, 1,  

DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ

DNAdam↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

CSCs↓, 1,   mTOR↓, 1,   PI3K↓, 1,   TumCG↓, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

TumCP↓, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature ⓘ

Hif1a↓, 1,   VEGF↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

NF-kB↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

eff↓, 1,   eff↑, 3,   eff↝, 1,  

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

toxicity↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 22

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Total Targets: 0

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: Hif1a, HIF1α/HIF1a
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:273  Target#:143  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page