Cichoric acid / Chicoric acid / ROS Cancer Research Results

Cic, Cichoric acid / Chicoric acid: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:

Cichoric acid
Product: Cichoric acid
Alias: Chicoric acid; dicaffeoyltartaric acid; 2,3-O-dicaffeoyltartaric acid
Source products: Echinacea purpurea, possibly chicory, lettuce, basil, dandelion, other Asteraceae/Lamiaceae plants
Category: Polyphenol / caffeic acid derivative
Primary use category: Anti-inflammatory / antioxidant / immune modulation / metabolic support
AD relevance: Possible, indirect — mainly anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, metabolic, and neuroinflammation-adjacent mechanisms
Cancer relevance: Possible preclinical only; not strong enough as a primary cancer product without specific paper support
-Cichoric acid is strongly related to Echinacea purpurea. It is one of the major caffeic-acid derivatives in echinacea and is commonly used as a quality marker for Echinacea purpurea extracts.

Cichoric acid / Chicoric acid — Cichoric acid is a naturally occurring dicaffeoyltartaric acid polyphenol, formally a hydroxycinnamic acid derivative composed of two caffeic acid units esterified to tartaric acid. It is best classified as a plant-derived phenolic acid / caffeic-acid derivative rather than a drug. Standard abbreviations include Cic, ChicA, and CA, although CA is ambiguous because it is also used for caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, carnosic acid, and many other database entries. Major sources include Echinacea purpurea, chicory, lettuce, basil, dandelion, and other Asteraceae/Lamiaceae plants. It is commonly used as a quality-marker compound for Echinacea purpurea extracts, but its direct cancer-development status remains preclinical only.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Redox buffering and cytoprotective antioxidant signaling, including ROS scavenging and context-dependent NRF2/HO-1 activation.
  2. Metabolic stress modulation through AMPK activation, mitochondrial protection, and reduced insulin/Akt/mTOR signaling in non-cancer metabolic models.
  3. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, including cytokine modulation and macrophage / lymphocyte / NK-cell immune effects in Echinacea-derived or enriched preparations.
  4. Preclinical cancer cytotoxicity through telomerase suppression, β-catenin reduction, caspase-9 activation, PARP cleavage, DNA fragmentation, and apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell models.
  5. Migration and EMT-related suppression, likely involving β-catenin/ZEB1-related signaling in colorectal-cancer models, but still early and not clinically validated.
  6. Neuroinflammation and amyloid-pathology modulation in Alzheimer’s disease models, including Aβ reduction, BACE1/APP lowering, L1CAM-associated synaptic marker restoration, and NRF2-linked antioxidant effects.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Oral systemic translation is constrained by polyphenol-type absorption, metabolism, plasma protein binding, and formulation stability. Rat PK/tissue-distribution work exists, but direct human PK data for isolated cichoric acid are limited. Echinacea extract exposure cannot be assumed to equal isolated cichoric acid exposure because alkamides, polysaccharides, glycoproteins, caftaric acid, and other constituents may drive part of the immune effect.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Many mechanistic studies use low-to-high micromolar cichoric acid concentrations. These concentrations may exceed free systemic exposure achievable from ordinary oral Echinacea or food intake, especially after first-pass and microbial metabolism. Low-micromolar effects such as 5 μM otoprotection in zebrafish are more pharmacologically plausible than high-micromolar cytotoxicity screens, but human-equivalent exposure remains uncertain.

Clinical evidence status: Cancer: preclinical only; no adequate human cancer trials for isolated cichoric acid. Immune / respiratory use: human evidence exists for Echinacea preparations, but not as isolated cichoric acid attribution. Alzheimer’s disease: preclinical only, with cell and animal-model support but no validated human clinical efficacy. Regulatory/deployment status: listed as a natural-health-product ingredient name by Health Canada; not an approved anticancer or AD therapeutic.

Cichoric Acid Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 ROS buffering and oxidative stress control ROS ↓ or oxidative stress modulation (context-dependent) ROS ↓; lipid peroxidation ↓; antioxidant defenses ↑ P, R Redox buffering Core polyphenol activity; likely contributes to anti-inflammatory, cytoprotective, and some cancer-cell stress effects.
2 NRF2 / HO-1 cytoprotective signaling NRF2 effects uncertain; may protect some tumor contexts (context-dependent) NRF2 ↑; HO-1 ↑; NQO1 ↑ R, G Adaptive antioxidant response Mechanistically relevant in normal-tissue protection and neuroprotection; not automatically favorable in established tumors because NRF2 can support therapy resistance in some cancers.
3 AMPK / Akt / mTOR metabolic signaling Akt/mTOR ↓ may reduce growth signaling (model-dependent) AMPK ↑; mitochondrial enzyme activity ↑; PGC-1α ↑; Akt/mTOR ↓ R, G Metabolic stress adaptation Strong mechanistic signal in myotube and aging/metabolic models; cancer relevance is plausible but not clinically established.
4 Telomerase suppression Telomerase ↓ in HCT-116 colorectal cancer cells Not established G Replicative capacity reduction One of the more specific cancer mechanisms reported for cichoric acid, but evidence remains mainly in vitro.
5 Intrinsic apoptosis and PARP cleavage DNA fragmentation ↑; caspase-9 ↑; cleaved PARP ↑; apoptosis ↑ Apoptosis ↓ in injury models (context-dependent) G Cell death induction in tumor models Observed in colorectal cancer cells; selectivity and achievable systemic exposure are unresolved.
6 β-catenin / EMT axis β-catenin ↓; ZEB1-related migration signaling ↓ (model-dependent) Not established G Migration and proliferation restraint Relevant to colorectal-cancer migration and Wnt-associated behavior, but still early-stage evidence.
7 NF-κB / inflammatory cytokines Inflammatory survival signaling ↓ (context-dependent) IL-6 ↓; IL-8 ↓; TNF ↓; IL-10 ↑ in Echinacea evidence base R, G Inflammation modulation Most human-adjacent data come from Echinacea preparations rather than purified cichoric acid.
8 Innate and adaptive immune modulation Indirect anticancer relevance only Macrophage activity ↑; NK-cell activity ↑; CD4 / Th1 responses ↑ (extract-dependent) G Immune support Important for Echinacea linkage; isolated cichoric acid should not be assumed to reproduce whole-extract immunology.
9 Mitochondrial protection Mitochondrial stress modulation (model-dependent) MnSOD ↑; mitochondrial enzyme activity ↑; mitochondrial oxidative damage ↓ R, G Bioenergetic protection More relevant to normal-tissue protection and neuro/metabolic models than direct cancer cytotoxicity.
10 Clinical Translation Constraint Anticancer concentrations may not be achievable in vivo Short-term Echinacea safety appears acceptable; long-term isolated compound safety is less defined G Translation limitation Bioavailability, extract standardization, enzymatic degradation during processing, and attribution to isolated cichoric acid are the main constraints.

TSF legend: P: 0–30 min R: 30 min–3 hr G: >3 hr



Alzheimer’s disease relevance: Cichoric acid has meaningful AD-preclinical relevance but no validated human AD clinical evidence. The main AD rationale is neuroinflammation and amyloid-pathology modulation rather than direct symptomatic cholinergic therapy. In animal and cellular AD models, cichoric acid has been reported to reduce Aβ burden, lower APP/BACE1 markers, improve synaptic-function markers, and activate antioxidant signaling. This supports an AD database sub-entry as preclinical / experimental, not as a clinically established intervention.

AD mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Aβ pathology reduction through decreased Aβ1–42, amyloid plaque burden, APP, and BACE1 in AD models.
  2. L1CAM-associated restoration of synaptic-function markers including PSD-95 and synaptophysin.
  3. Neuroinflammation suppression and systemic inflammation-to-brain inflammatory signaling reduction.
  4. NRF2-linked antioxidant defense activation with HO-1 and NQO1 support in brain-aging models.
  5. Metabolic and mitochondrial protection through AMPK/antioxidant effects, extrapolated from non-AD mechanistic models.

Clinical evidence status: AD evidence remains preclinical. No adequate human RCT evidence supports cichoric acid as an Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Translation constraints include oral exposure, blood-brain exposure, dose standardization, and uncertainty over whether whole-plant extracts reproduce isolated cichoric acid effects.

Cichoric Acid Alzheimer’s Disease Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Modulation TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Aβ / APP / BACE1 axis Aβ1–42 ↓; plaques ↓; APP ↓; BACE1 ↓ G Amyloid-pathology reduction Reported in APPswe/Ind SH-SY5Y and 5xFAD mouse models; human translation remains unproven.
2 L1CAM / synaptic marker axis L1CAM ↑; PSD-95 ↑; synaptophysin ↑ G Synaptic-function support L1CAM knockdown attenuated the synaptic-marker response in the reported model, making this a relatively specific AD mechanism.
3 Neuroinflammation Neuroinflammation ↓; inflammatory cytokines ↓ (model-dependent) R, G Inflammatory injury reduction Relevant because systemic inflammation can amplify AD-like neuroinflammation and amyloidogenesis in mouse models.
4 NRF2 / HO-1 / NQO1 antioxidant defense NRF2 nuclear signaling ↑; HO-1 ↑; NQO1 ↑; oxidative stress ↓ R, G Neuronal stress resilience Best interpreted as cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory support, not disease-modifying clinical proof.
5 AMPK / mitochondrial protection AMPK ↑; mitochondrial protection ↑; Akt/mTOR ↓ R, G Metabolic resilience Mechanistically plausible for AD but partly extrapolated from non-neuronal and aging/metabolic models.
6 Clinical Translation Constraint Human efficacy unvalidated; CNS exposure uncertain G Evidence limitation Use as an AD entry should be marked preclinical / experimental, with no implied human therapeutic efficacy.

TSF legend: P: 0–30 min R: 30 min–3 hr G: >3 hr



ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species: Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj (inhibit)
Type:
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive molecules that contain oxygen and can lead to oxidative stress in cells. They play a dual role in cancer biology, acting as both promoters and suppressors of cancer.
ROS can cause oxidative damage to DNA, leading to mutations that may contribute to cancer initiation and progression. So normally you want to inhibit ROS to prevent cell mutations.
However excessive ROS can induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, potentially limiting tumor growth. Chemotherapy typically raises ROS.
-mitochondria is the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (and the ETC is heavily related)

"Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are two electron reduction products of oxygen, including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, lipid peroxides, protein peroxides and peroxides formed in nucleic acids 1. They are maintained in a dynamic balance by a series of reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions in biological systems and act as signaling molecules to drive cellular regulatory pathways."
"During different stages of cancer formation, abnormal ROS levels play paradoxical roles in cell growth and death 8. A physiological concentration of ROS that maintained in equilibrium is necessary for normal cell survival. Ectopic ROS accumulation promotes cell proliferation and consequently induces malignant transformation of normal cells by initiating pathological conversion of physiological signaling networks. Excessive ROS levels lead to cell death by damaging cellular components, including proteins, lipid bilayers, and chromosomes. Therefore, both scavenging abnormally elevated ROS to prevent early neoplasia and facilitating ROS production to specifically kill cancer cells are promising anticancer therapeutic strategies, in spite of their contradictoriness and complexity."
"ROS are the collection of derivatives of molecular oxygen that occur in biology, which can be categorized into two types, free radicals and non-radical species. The non-radical species are hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2 ), organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), singlet molecular oxygen ( 1 O 2 ), electronically excited carbonyl, ozone (O3 ), hypochlorous acid (HOCl, and hypobromous acid HOBr). Free radical species are super-oxide anion radical (O 2•−), hydroxyl radical (•OH), peroxyl radical (ROO•) and alkoxyl radical (RO•) [130]. Any imbalance of ROS can lead to adverse effects. H2 O 2 and O 2 •− are the main redox signalling agents. The cellular concentration of H2 O 2 is about 10−8 M, which is almost a thousand times more than that of O2 •−".
"Radicals are molecules with an odd number of electrons in the outer shell [393,394]. A pair of radicals can be formed by breaking a chemical bond or electron transfer between two molecules."

Recent investigations have documented that polyphenols with good antioxidant activity may exhibit pro-oxidant activity in the presence of copper ions, which can induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines but not in normal cells. "We have shown that such cell growth inhibition by polyphenols in cancer cells is reversed by copper-specific sequestering agent neocuproine to a significant extent whereas iron and zinc chelators are relatively ineffective, thus confirming the role of endogenous copper in the cytotoxic action of polyphenols against cancer cells. Therefore, this mechanism of mobilization of endogenous copper." > Ions could be one of the important mechanisms for the cytotoxic action of plant polyphenols against cancer cells and is possibly a common mechanism for all plant polyphenols. In fact, similar results obtained with four different polyphenolic compounds in this study, namely apigenin, luteolin, EGCG, and resveratrol, strengthen this idea.
Interestingly, the normal breast epithelial MCF10A cells have earlier been shown to possess no detectable copper as opposed to breast cancer cells [24], which may explain their resistance to polyphenols apigenin- and luteolin-induced growth inhibition as observed here (Fig. 1). We have earlier proposed [25] that this preferential cytotoxicity of plant polyphenols toward cancer cells is explained by the observation made several years earlier, which showed that copper levels in cancer cells are significantly elevated in various malignancies. Thus, because of higher intracellular copper levels in cancer cells, it may be predicted that the cytotoxic concentrations of polyphenols required would be lower in these cells as compared to normal cells."

Majority of ROS are produced as a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation, high levels of ROS are detected in almost all cancers.
-It is well established that during ER stress, cytosolic calcium released from the ER is taken up by the mitochondrion to stimulate ROS overgeneration and the release of cytochrome c, both of which lead to apoptosis.

Note: Products that may raise ROS can be found using this database, by:
Filtering on the target of ROS, and selecting the Effect Direction of ↑

Targets to raise ROS (to kill cancer cells):
• NADPH oxidases (NOX): NOX enzymes are involved in the production of ROS.
    -Targeting NOX enzymes can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
    -eNOX2 inhibition leads to a high NADH/NAD⁺ ratio which can lead to increased ROS
• Mitochondrial complex I: Inhibiting can increase ROS production
• P53: Activating p53 can increase ROS levels(by inducing the expression of pro-oxidant genes)
Nrf2 inhibition: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting Nrf2 can increase ROS levels
• Glutathione (GSH): an antioxidant. Depleting GSH can increase ROS levels
• Catalase: Catalase converts H2O2 into H2O+O. Inhibiting catalase can increase ROS levels
• SOD1: converts superoxide into hydrogen peroxide. Inhibiting SOD1 can increase ROS levels
• PI3K/AKT pathway: regulates cell survival and metabolism. Inhibiting can increase ROS levels
HIF-1α inhibition: regulates genes involved in metabolism and angiogenesis. Inhibiting HIF-1α can increase ROS
• Glycolysis: Inhibiting glycolysis can increase ROS levels • Fatty acid oxidation: Cancer cells often rely on fatty acid oxidation for energy production.
-Inhibiting fatty acid oxidation can increase ROS levels
• ER stress: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can increase ROS levels
• Autophagy: process by which cells recycle damaged organelles and proteins.
-Inhibiting autophagy can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• KEAP1/Nrf2 pathway: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes.
    -Inhibiting KEAP1 or activating Nrf2 can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• DJ-1: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting DJ-1 can increase ROS levels
• PARK2: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting PARK2 can increase ROS levels
SIRT1 inhibition:regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting SIRT1 can increase ROS levels
AMPK activation: regulates energy metabolism and can increase ROS levels when activated.
mTOR inhibition: regulates cell growth and metabolism. Inhibiting mTOR can increase ROS levels
HSP90 inhibition: regulates protein folding and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Proteasome: degrades damaged proteins. Inhibiting the proteasome can increase ROS levels
Lipid peroxidation: a process by which lipids are oxidized, leading to the production of ROS.
    -Increasing lipid peroxidation can increase ROS levels
• Ferroptosis: form of cell death that is regulated by iron and lipid peroxidation.
    -Increasing ferroptosis can increase ROS levels
• Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP): regulates mitochondrial permeability.
    -Opening the mPTP can increase ROS levels
• BCL-2 family proteins: regulate apoptosis and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Caspase-independent cell death: a form of cell death that is regulated by ROS.
    -Increasing caspase-independent cell death can increase ROS levels
• DNA damage response: regulates the repair of DNA damage. Increasing DNA damage can increase ROS
• Epigenetic regulation: process by which gene expression is regulated.
    -Increasing epigenetic regulation can increase ROS levels

-PKM2, but not PKM1, can be inhibited by direct oxidation of cysteine 358 as an adaptive response to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)

ProOxidant Strategy:(inhibit the Mevalonate Pathway (likely will also inhibit GPx)
-HydroxyCitrate (HCA) found as supplement online and typically used in a dose of about 1.5g/day or more
-Atorvastatin typically 40-80mg/day, -Dipyridamole typically 200mg 2x/day Combined effect research
-Lycopene typically 100mg/day range (note debatable as it mainly lowers NRF2)

Dual Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and their Application in Cancer Therapy
ROS-Inducing Interventions in Cancer — Canonical + Mechanistic Reference
-generated from AI and Cancer database
ROS rating:  +++ strong | ++ moderate | + weak | ± mixed | 0 none
NRF2:        ↓ suppressed | ↑ activated | ± mixed | 0 none
Conditions:  [D] dose  [Fe] metal  [M] metabolic  [O₂] oxygen
             [L] light [F] formulation [T] tumor-type [C] combination

Item ROS NRF2 Condition Mechanism Class Remarks
ROS">Piperlongumine +++ [D][T] ROS-dominant
ROS">Shikonin +++↓/±[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Vitamin K3 (menadione) +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Copper (ionic / nano) +++[Fe][F]ROS-dominant
ROS">Sodium Selenite +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Juglone +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Auranofin +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) +++0[L][O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Radiotherapy / Radiation +++0[O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Doxorubicin +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Cisplatin ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Salinomycin ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Artemisinin / DHA ++[Fe][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Sulfasalazine ++[C][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">FMD / fasting ++[M][C][O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Vitamin C (pharmacologic) ++[Fe][D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Silver nanoparticles ++±[F][D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Gambogic acid ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Parthenolide ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Plumbagin ++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Allicin ++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Ashwagandha (Withaferin A) ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Berberine ++[D][M]ROS-dominant
ROS">PEITC ++[D][C]ROS-dominant
ROS">Methionine restriction +[M][C][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">DCA +±[M][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Capsaicin +±[D][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Galloflavin +0[D]ROS-secondary
ROS">Piperine +±[D][F]ROS-secondary
ROS">Propyl gallate +[D]ROS-secondary
ROS">Scoulerine +?[D][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Thymoquinone ±±[D][T]Dual redox
ROS">Emodin ±±[D][T]Dual redox
ROS">Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) ±[D][M]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Curcumin ±↑/↓[D][F]NRF2-dominant
ROS">EGCG ±↑/↓[D][O₂]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Quercetin ±↑/↓[D][Fe]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Resveratrol ±[D][M]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Sulforaphane ±↑↑[D]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Lycopene 0Antioxidant
ROS">Rosmarinic acid 0Antioxidant
ROS">Citrate 00Neutral


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
6622- Cic,    Chicoric Acid Is an Antioxidant Molecule That Stimulates AMP Kinase Pathway in L6 Myotubes and Extends Lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans
- in-vivo, Nor, NA
*ROS↓, *AMPK↑, *GPx↑, *SOD↑, *SOD2↑, *PGC-1α↑, *Akt↓, *mTOR↓, *Insulin↓, *antiOx↑, *AntiAge↑,
6623- Cic,  MTX,    Chicoric acid prevents methotrexate hepatotoxicity via attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammation and up-regulation of PPARγ and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling
- in-vivo, Nor, NA
*antiOx↑, *hepatoP↑, *ROS↓, *lipid-P↓, *TAC↑, *NRF2↑, *HO-1↑, *NQO1↑, *PPARγ↑, *Inflam↓, *Apoptosis↓, *Bcl-2↑, *BAX↓, *Cyt‑c↓, *Casp3↓,
6624- Cic,    Chicoric acid supplementation ameliorates cognitive impairment induced by oxidative stress via promotion of antioxidant defense system
- in-vivo, AD, NA - in-vivo, Park, NA
*neuroP↑, *TNF-α↓, *IL1β↓, *MDA↓, *Catalase↑, *GSH↑, *NRF2↑, *mtDam↓, *Inflam↓, *Apoptosis↓, *ROS↓, *cognitive↑, *Aβ↓, *BDNF∅, *APP↓, *BACE↓,
6632- Cic,    Chicoric Acid Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Oxidative Stress via Promoting the Keap1/Nrf2 Transcriptional Signaling Pathway in BV-2 Microglial Cells and Mouse Brain
- vitro+vivo, Nor, NA
*antiOx↑, *Obesity↓, *NRF2↑, *HO-1↑, *NQO1↑, *ROS↓, *GSH↑, *Catalase↑, *SOD↑, *ATP↑, *COX2↓, *iNOS↓, *neuroP↑,
6633- Cic,    Chicoric acid (Synonyms: Cichoric acid; Dicaffeoyltartaric acid)
- Review, NA, NA
ROS↑, tumCV↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 5 of 5

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 5

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress

ROS↑, 1,  

Transcription & Epigenetics

tumCV↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 2

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress

antiOx↑, 3,   Catalase↑, 2,   GPx↑, 1,   GSH↑, 2,   HO-1↑, 2,   lipid-P↓, 1,   MDA↓, 1,   NQO1↑, 2,   NRF2↑, 3,   ROS↓, 4,   SOD↑, 2,   SOD2↑, 1,   TAC↑, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics

ATP↑, 1,   Insulin↓, 1,   mtDam↓, 1,   PGC-1α↑, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis

AMPK↑, 1,   PPARγ↑, 1,  

Cell Death

Akt↓, 1,   Apoptosis↓, 2,   BAX↓, 1,   Bcl-2↑, 1,   Casp3↓, 1,   Cyt‑c↓, 1,   iNOS↓, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State

mTOR↓, 1,  

Migration

APP↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling

COX2↓, 1,   IL1β↓, 1,   Inflam↓, 2,   TNF-α↓, 1,  

Synaptic & Neurotransmission

BDNF∅, 1,  

Protein Aggregation

Aβ↓, 1,   BACE↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes

AntiAge↑, 1,   cognitive↑, 1,   hepatoP↑, 1,   neuroP↑, 2,   Obesity↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 40

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species
5 Cichoric acid / Chicoric acid
1 methotrexate
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:416  Target#:275  State#:%  Dir#:%
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page