Ellagic acid / Risk Cancer Research Results

EA, Ellagic acid: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Polyphenol found in fruits, vegetables, nuts and some mushrooms. Strawberries, raspberries, blackberries, cherries and walnuts, green tea and red wine. Pomegranate arils are a well known source.
Ellagic acid (EA) is a dietary polyphenol found in berries and pomegranate-related foods, with reported anti-inflammatory (NF-κB↓), survival-pathway suppression (PI3K/AKT↓), and anti-proliferative effects including G1 arrest and apoptosis in many cancer models. A key practical nuance is that EA/ellagitannins are extensively transformed by gut microbiota into urolithins, which are more bioavailable and may account for a large share of systemic effects.

- Ellagitannins are high molecular weight polyphenols with a complex structure that includes one or more HHDP groups attached to a sugar.
- Ellagic Acid is the simpler, bioactive compound released when the HHDP groups in ellagitannins cyclize during hydrolysis.
- one best source is raspberries. 100g gives ~50mg(reasonable dose)
- Ellagic acid has very poor oral bioavailability
- Peak plasma EA after high oral intake is typically: <50–100 nM, often much lower, this is far below concentrations used in many in-vitro anticancer studies (5–50 µM).
- efficacy depends on gut metabolism (ie ability to produce Urolithin A)
- also look at Urolithin supplements

Pathways:
Apoptosis Regulation: (Bax, Bad) (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL)
Cell Cycle Arrest: G0/G1 or G2/M phases)
NF-κB (inhibit):
MAPK Pathways: (including ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 MAPK)
PI3K/Akt/mTOR: might downregulate this pathway
p53 Pathway: may influence the expression or activation of p53
Oxidative Stress and Nrf2 Pathway:exhibits antioxidant properties,
Summary:
- Anti-oxidant and metal chelating
- with some evidence it can induce ROS in cancer tumor conditions (mitochondrial stress, redox-unstable cells)
- reported synergy with Curcumin
- Reported, reduced the viability of cancer cells at a concentration of 10 µmol/L, while in healthy cells, this effect was observed only at a concentration of 200 µmol/L
- Pomegranate juice (PJ) (180 ml) containing EA (25 mg) and ETs (318 mg, as punicalagins, the major fruit ellagitannin). Plasma concentration (31.9 ng/ml) after 1 h post-ingestion but was rapidly eliminated by 4 h. (Hence might be difficult to consume enough EA!!!! to match vitro requirements)
- Increased the expression of p53 and p21 proteins as well as markers of apoptosis (Bax and caspase-3), and decreases Bcl-2, NF-кB, and iNOS
- EA has restricted bioavailability, primarily due to its hydrophobic nature and very low water solubility.
- Processing methods can alter EA content; peel extraction often increases measured EA, while prolonged storage/freezing may reduce levels.

Total ellagic acid equivalents (free + bound).
Punica granatum L. Pomegranate 700mg/kg (arils), 38700mg/kg(mesocarp)
Rubus idaeus L. Raspberry 2637–3309mg/kg
jaglandaceae Walnut 410mg/kg(freeEA) 8230mg/kg(totalEA)

Ellagic acid — a naturally occurring hydrolysable polyphenol and dilactone derived from hexahydroxydiphenic acid. It occurs as free ellagic acid and, more commonly, as a structural component or hydrolysis product of ellagitannins in pomegranate, raspberries, blackberries, strawberries, walnuts, muscadine grapes, and related foods. It is formally classified as a dietary polyphenolic phytochemical rather than an approved anticancer drug. Oral EA has low aqueous solubility, limited absorption, rapid conjugation, and extensive microbiome-dependent conversion into urolithins; therefore, free EA and its microbial metabolites should be treated as related but pharmacokinetically distinct agents.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Induction of mitochondrial apoptosis through mitochondrial membrane depolarization, cytochrome-c release, Bax/Bcl-2 rebalancing, caspase activation, and suppression of anti-apoptotic proteins.
  2. Suppression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR and related survival signaling, with context-dependent inhibition of STAT3, ERK, and oncogenic growth programs.
  3. Cell-cycle arrest through p53 and p21 activation and suppression of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases.
  4. Suppression of NF-κB-regulated inflammatory, survival, invasion, and cytokine programs.
  5. Context-dependent redox modulation: antioxidant and NRF2-associated cytoprotection in normal or injured tissues, but ROS generation and oxidative mitochondrial injury in susceptible cancer cells, particularly at higher experimental concentrations or in combination treatments.
  6. Inhibition of glycolysis and tumor pH regulation through reduced glucose utilization, lactate production, PKM2 or LDH activity, and NHE1-dependent proton extrusion in selected cancer models.
  7. Suppression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration, invasion, and metastasis through modulation of TGF-β/SMAD, Snail, β-catenin, MMP2, MMP9, and adhesion pathways.
  8. Anti-angiogenic effects involving reduced HIF-1α, VEGF, and VEGFR2 signaling.
  9. Context-dependent chemosensitization and radiosensitization through suppression of survival signaling, increased DNA damage or ROS, and reduced drug-resistance or EMT programs.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Free EA has very poor oral bioavailability because of low water solubility, limited intestinal permeability, rapid methylation and glucuronidation, and short systemic persistence. Human plasma exposure to unchanged EA after ellagitannin-rich foods is generally transient and substantially below the micromolar concentrations commonly used in cancer-cell experiments. Gut bacteria convert unabsorbed EA and ellagitannins into urolithins, which circulate mainly as glucuronide or sulfate conjugates and may account for much of the systemic biological activity. Urolithin production varies markedly among individuals according to microbiome metabotype. Liposomal, nanoparticle, phospholipid, and other delivery systems improve exposure experimentally, but none has established clinical anticancer efficacy.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Many anticancer studies use approximately 5–100 µM EA for hours to days. These concentrations commonly exceed achievable circulating free-EA exposure after food or conventional oral supplementation. Direct relevance is greater for gastrointestinal luminal exposure, local tissue exposure, specialized formulations, or experiments involving metabolites. Results obtained at high micromolar concentrations should not be interpreted as evidence that an ordinary dietary dose will produce equivalent systemic tumor effects.

Clinical evidence status: Predominantly preclinical. EA has extensive cell-culture evidence and several animal tumor studies, but human oncology evidence remains limited to an older small adjunctive prostate-cancer trial, observational or combination-product studies, tissue-disposition studies, and trials of ellagitannin-rich pomegranate, berry, or muscadine extracts. These mixed extracts cannot establish EA-specific efficacy. Human randomized trials in metabolic, inflammatory, gastrointestinal, and neurologic conditions provide preliminary safety and biomarker data but do not validate EA as a cancer treatment. EA is not an FDA-approved anticancer agent and should be classified as investigational or dietary adjunct evidence, not established oncology therapy.

Safety / interaction constraints: Food-derived exposure is generally well tolerated, and small supplementation trials have not identified a consistent major toxicity signal. Long-term safety of purified high-dose EA in oncology populations is insufficiently characterized. Potential interaction concerns include inhibition or modulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters, antiplatelet activity, and uncertain effects when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The antioxidant-versus-pro-oxidant direction is dose-, tissue-, and treatment-dependent; concurrent use during cancer therapy therefore requires clinical review rather than assuming either protection or sensitization.


Ellagic Acid Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Mitochondrial apoptosis Mitochondrial membrane potential ↓; Bax and cytochrome-c ↑; Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL ↓; caspase-3 and caspase-9 ↑ Apoptotic injury ↓ or ↔ (context-dependent) R, G Programmed tumor-cell death A recurrent downstream mechanism, usually following survival-pathway inhibition, mitochondrial stress, or ROS accumulation.
2 PI3K AKT mTOR survival signaling PI3K ↓; phosphorylated AKT ↓; mTOR ↓; PTEN ↑ (model-dependent) AKT survival signaling ↔ or ↑ during tissue injury (context-dependent) R, G Growth and survival suppression The direction can differ in nonmalignant injury models, where EA may preserve physiological AKT signaling.
3 Cell-cycle and p53 p21 control p53 ↑; p21 ↑; cyclin D1 and cyclin E ↓; CDK2, CDK4, and CDK6 ↓; arrest ↑ Aberrant proliferation ↓; normal cycling cells usually less affected G Cytostasis and apoptosis priming G0/G1 arrest is frequent, although G2/M or S-phase effects occur depending on tumor type and exposure.
4 NF-κB inflammatory survival signaling NF-κB activation ↓; COX-2 ↓; iNOS ↓; IL-6 and IL-8 ↓; anti-apoptotic transcription ↓ Inflammatory signaling ↓ R, G Anti-inflammatory and anti-survival activity NF-κB suppression can contribute to reduced proliferation, invasion, treatment resistance, and inflammatory cytokine production.
5 Mitochondrial ROS increase ROS ↑; oxidative DNA damage ↑; mitochondrial stress ↑ (dose-dependent) ROS injury ↓ or ↔ through antioxidant activity (context-dependent) P, R Selective oxidative stress Pro-oxidant effects are most evident in redox-unstable cancer cells, high-concentration experiments, and combination treatments. EA is not uniformly pro-oxidant.
6 NRF2 antioxidant response NRF2 and HO-1 ↔, ↑, or ↓ (model-dependent) NRF2 ↑; HO-1 and antioxidant enzymes ↑; lipid peroxidation ↓ R, G Secondary redox adaptation Normal-tissue protection is relatively consistent, whereas cancer-cell NRF2 modulation is heterogeneous and may depend on baseline NRF2 activity.
7 Glycolysis and intracellular pH regulation Glucose consumption ↓; lactate production ↓; LDH and PKM2 ↓; NHE1 ↓; intracellular pH ↓ (model-dependent) ↔ R, G Metabolic restriction and acidification Demonstrated in selected cancer models and should not be generalized to every tumor type.
8 STAT3 and MAPK growth signaling STAT3 ↓; phosphorylated STAT3 ↓; ERK signaling ↓; JNK or p38 modulation (context-dependent) Stress-responsive MAPK signaling ↔ or normalized R, G Proliferation and survival inhibition MAPK direction varies with tumor type, concentration, and whether stress-mediated apoptosis is being induced.
9 EMT invasion and metastasis TGF-β and SMAD signaling ↓; Snail and Twist ↓; vimentin ↓; E-cadherin ↑; MMP2 and MMP9 ↓ Pathological matrix remodeling ↓ G Reduced migration and invasion Includes reversal of EMT and, in some models, partial resensitization of drug-resistant cancer cells.
10 HIF-1α VEGF angiogenesis HIF-1α ↓; VEGF ↓; VEGFR2 signaling ↓; angiogenesis ↓ Pathological angiogenesis ↓; physiological effect uncertain G Anti-angiogenic activity Supported mainly by cell, endothelial-assay, and animal evidence rather than validated clinical anti-angiogenic activity.
11 DNA damage and repair balance Oxidative DNA damage ↑; PARP cleavage ↑; p53-dependent damage response ↑ (dose-dependent) Genotoxic injury ↓ through antioxidant and antimutagenic activity (context-dependent) R, G Tumor-cell damage with normal-cell protection potential The bidirectional profile reflects differing redox conditions and exposure levels in malignant versus normal systems.
12 Chemosensitization Drug sensitivity ↑; EMT and survival signaling ↓; apoptosis ↑ (combination-dependent) Chemotherapy-associated injury may ↓ in some models R, G Adjunctive treatment modulation Reported with agents including gemcitabine and several experimental combinations. Clinical confirmation is inadequate.
13 Radiosensitization Radiation response ↑; ROS and DNA damage ↑; clonogenic survival ↓ (model-dependent) Radiation injury may ↓ through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects (model-dependent) P, R, G Differential radiation response Recent preclinical work supports possible simultaneous tumor sensitization and normal-tissue protection, but this has not been established clinically.
14 Microbiome conversion to urolithins Direct EA exposure limited; systemic effects may be mediated partly by urolithin metabolites Urolithin production and conjugate exposure vary markedly among individuals G Metabolite-dependent systemic activity Metabotype 0, A, or B and microbial composition can materially alter metabolite identity, quantity, and biological response.
15 Clinical Translation Constraint Free EA exposure commonly below active in-vitro concentrations; tumor delivery unproven Food exposure generally tolerated; high-dose long-term safety and drug interactions incompletely defined G Bioavailability and evidence limitation Poor solubility, rapid metabolism, microbiome heterogeneity, mixed-extract trials, limited oncology RCT evidence, and lack of an approved pharmaceutical formulation restrict translation.

TSF: P: 0–30 min    R: 30 min–3 hr    G: >3 hr
Risk, Risk: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Risk: by definition reduces risk of disease or cancer.
Down Target direction of risk indicates lower cancer risk.
ChemoPreventive also mean lower cancer risk. But for Chemopreventive an up arrow indicates more preventive. 
Cancer Risk Impact Score (CRIS)
CRIS scale:
–5 = very strong risk reduction
–4 = strong risk reduction
–3 = moderate risk reduction
–2 = modest risk reduction
–1 = weak / context-dependent
0 = neutral




CRIS Exposure / Compound Evidence Cancers Notes




-5 Exercise (overall)
VStrong Hum BC, CRC, Endo, PCa, Liv






-5 Aerobic + resistance VStrong Hum Broad inc + mort






-4 Aerobic exercise (mod–vig) VStrong Hum BC, CRC, Endo






-4 Resistance training (alone) Strong Hum BC, CRC






-3 High-intensity interval training Mod–Strong Hum BC, CRC






-2 NEAT / low-intensity activity Moderate Hum CRC






-5 Cruciferous vegetable pattern Strong Hum Lung, CRC, BC, PCa






-5 Sunlight exposure (physiologic) Strong Hum CRC, BC, PCa






-4 Fasting (metabolic pattern)
Strong Mech + Hum BC, CRC, PCa 






-4 Curcumin
Hum + Pre GI, BC, PCa






-4 Sulforaphane
Hum + Pre Lung, CRC, BC






-4 PEITC
Hum + Pre Lung, CRC, PCa






-4 EGCG (tea matrix)
Strong Hum GI, PCa, BC






-4 Lycopene
Strong Hum PCa






-4 Apigenin
Pre + Diet Hum BC, PCa, CRC 






-4 Luteolin
Pre + Diet Hum Lung, CRC, BC 






-4 Kaempferol
Diet Hum Ov, Panc, Lung






-4 Fisetin
Pre + Early Hum CRC, PCa, Mel






-4 Ellagic acid → Urolithin A
Hum (microbiome) CRC, PCa, BC






-3 Omega-3 (EPA/DHA)
Strong Hum CRC, BC






-3 Vitamin D3 (supp)
Obs + RCT CRC, BC






-3 Garlic (allicin)
Mod Hum GI






-3 Mushroom beta-glucans
Hum adjunct GI, BC






-3 Melatonin
Hum + Mech BC, PCa






-3 Coffee (whole)
Strong Hum Liv, Endo






-2 Quercetin
Limited Hum Lung, CRC






-2 Resveratrol
Limited Hum CRC, BC






-2 I3C / DIM
Mod Hum BC, Cerv






-2 Thymoquinone
Early Hum BC, CRC






-2 Beta-carotene (food)
Hum Lung






-1 Vitamin K2 (MK-4/7)
Limited Hum Liv, PCa






-1 Boron
Obs PCa, Lung






0 Vitamin C (oral)
Strong Hum —






0 Genistein (soy)
Strong Hum BC, PCa






0 Selenium (diet)
Mixed Hum PCa






0 Capsaicin
Mixed Gastric






+2 Vitamin E (alpha only)
Strong RCT PCa






+2 Green tea extract (high-dose)
Case reports Liv






+4 Beta-carotene (supplement)
Strong RCT Lung (smokers)






+5 Alcohol (ethanol)
Strong Hum BC, Liv, Eso







Evidence
Hum        human data
VStrong    very strong
Strong     strong
Mod        moderate
Obs        observational
Pre        preclinical
RCT        randomized controlled trial
Mech       mechanistic
Adjunct    adjunct clinical use


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
6804- EA,    Ellagic acid metabolism by human gut microbiota: consistent observation of three urolithin phenotypes in intervention trials, independent of food source, age, and health status
- Human, Nor, NA
*other?, *Risk↓, *GutMicro↝,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Total Targets: 0

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Transcription & Epigenetics(tgid=7) ⓘ

other?, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers(tgid=22) ⓘ

GutMicro↝, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23) ⓘ

Risk↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 3

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: Risk, Risk
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:74  Target#:785  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page