tbResList Print — WBV Whole Body Vibration

Filters: qv=176, qv2=%, rfv=%

Product

WBV Whole Body Vibration
Features: Therapy
Description: <b>Whole Body Vibration (WBV)</b> is a mechanical intervention in which individuals stand or exercise on a vibrating platform, producing oscillatory mechanical stimuli that activate neuromuscular, endocrine, and circulatory responses. In oncology contexts, WBV is not a direct cytotoxic therapy. Its relevance lies primarily in supportive care, including preservation of muscle mass, mitigation of cancer-related fatigue, improvement of bone density, enhancement of circulation, and modulation of inflammatory signaling. Preclinical mechanobiology research suggests mechanical stimuli can influence bone remodeling (RANKL/OPG axis), myokine release (e.g., IL-6 in exercise context), and possibly immune tone. However, WBV should be categorized as a supportive or rehabilitation modality rather than a tumor-targeting intervention. Clinical evidence in cancer patients primarily addresses quality of life, sarcopenia, and functional performance.<br>

<br>

<h3>Cancer Pathway Table: Whole Body Vibration</h3>
<!-- Cancer Pathway Table: Whole Body Vibration -->
<table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Pathway / Axis</th>
<th>Cancer / Tumor Context</th>
<th>Normal Tissue Context</th>
<th>TSF</th>
<th>Primary Effect</th>
<th>Notes / Interpretation</th>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Muscle preservation (mechanotransduction)</td>
<td>Sarcopenia mitigation ↑; physical function ↑</td>
<td>Muscle strength ↑; neuromuscular activation ↑</td>
<td>R, G</td>
<td>Rehabilitation support</td>
<td>WBV stimulates muscle spindle activation and improves muscle recruitment; useful in cancer-related deconditioning.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Bone remodeling (RANKL / OPG axis)</td>
<td>Bone density support (context; metastasis caution)</td>
<td>Osteogenesis ↑; bone turnover balance</td>
<td>G</td>
<td>Skeletal support</td>
<td>Mechanical loading influences osteoblast activity; caution in patients with bone metastases.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Circulatory enhancement</td>
<td>Peripheral circulation ↑; fatigue ↓ (reported)</td>
<td>Microcirculation ↑</td>
<td>P, R</td>
<td>Perfusion support</td>
<td>Improved blood flow may assist recovery and reduce fatigue.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Inflammatory modulation</td>
<td>Inflammatory cytokines ↓ (exercise-like response; reported)</td>
<td>Systemic inflammation moderation</td>
<td>R, G</td>
<td>Anti-inflammatory (supportive)</td>
<td>Effects resemble mild exercise-induced anti-inflammatory signaling.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Endocrine / myokine signaling</td>
<td>IGF-1 modulation (context-dependent)</td>
<td>Exercise-like endocrine shifts</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>Hormonal modulation</td>
<td>Mechanical stimulation can alter anabolic and metabolic signaling.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Immune modulation</td>
<td>Immune tone modulation (limited data)</td>
<td>↔</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>Systemic support</td>
<td>Evidence limited; potential indirect immune benefits via improved physical conditioning.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Warburg metabolism</td>
<td>No direct effect on tumor glycolysis</td>
<td>↔</td>
<td>—</td>
<td>Not applicable</td>
<td>WBV is not a metabolic enzyme inhibitor or direct tumor-targeting modality.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Quality of life / fatigue</td>
<td>Fatigue ↓; functional capacity ↑</td>
<td>Improved mobility</td>
<td>G</td>
<td>Supportive care</td>
<td>Most consistent clinical benefit in oncology populations.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Safety considerations</td>
<td>Caution in bone metastases, thrombosis risk</td>
<td>Generally safe when supervised</td>
<td>—</td>
<td>Clinical constraint</td>
<td>Contraindicated or modified in patients with unstable fractures or severe metastatic bone disease.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Evidence base</td>
<td>Primarily supportive care data</td>
<td>—</td>
<td>—</td>
<td>Translation constraint</td>
<td>No strong evidence for direct tumor suppression; used as adjunct rehabilitation tool.</td>
</tr>

</table>

<p><small>
TSF: P = immediate neuromuscular activation; R = systemic signaling shifts; G = long-term musculoskeletal and functional adaptation.
</small></p>


<br>
<br>
<h3>AD Summary — Whole Body Vibration (WBV)</h3>

Whole Body Vibration (WBV) is a mechanical intervention that delivers low-amplitude, oscillatory stimuli through a vibrating platform, activating neuromuscular and neurovascular pathways. In Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research, WBV is explored as a non-pharmacologic intervention aimed at improving cerebral blood flow, reducing neuroinflammation, enhancing neurotrophic signaling (e.g., BDNF), and mitigating sarcopenia-related frailty that contributes to cognitive decline. Preclinical studies suggest WBV may reduce microglial activation, lower pro-inflammatory cytokines, and support hippocampal plasticity. Clinical data in AD populations are still limited but suggest potential benefits for balance, mobility, and possibly cognitive performance. WBV should be positioned as a supportive neurorehabilitative modality rather than a direct disease-modifying therapy.<br>
<br>


<h3>Alzheimer’s Disease Table: Whole Body Vibration</h3>
<!-- Alzheimer’s Disease Table: Whole Body Vibration -->
<table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>Pathway / Axis</th>
<th>AD / Neurodegeneration Context</th>
<th>Normal Brain Context</th>
<th>TSF</th>
<th>Primary Effect</th>
<th>Notes / Interpretation</th>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Cerebral blood flow (CBF)</td>
<td>CBF ↑ (reported in small studies)</td>
<td>Improved perfusion</td>
<td>P, R</td>
<td>Neurovascular support</td>
<td>Mechanical stimulation may enhance cerebral perfusion, relevant in vascular contributions to AD.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Neuroinflammation (microglial activation)</td>
<td>Microglial activation ↓; cytokines ↓ (reported in animal models)</td>
<td>Inflammatory tone moderation</td>
<td>R, G</td>
<td>Anti-inflammatory support</td>
<td>Preclinical models show reduced TNF-α and IL-1β expression.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>BDNF / neurotrophic signaling</td>
<td>BDNF ↑ (exercise-like response; reported)</td>
<td>Synaptic plasticity support</td>
<td>R, G</td>
<td>Neuroplasticity enhancement</td>
<td>WBV may mimic some exercise-induced neurotrophic effects.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Synaptic plasticity / hippocampal function</td>
<td>Memory performance ↑ (model-dependent)</td>
<td>Synaptic resilience ↑</td>
<td>G</td>
<td>Cognitive support</td>
<td>Rodent studies suggest improved hippocampal function; human evidence limited.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Mitochondrial function</td>
<td>Indirect metabolic support (via perfusion/exercise signaling)</td>
<td>Energy metabolism support</td>
<td>R</td>
<td>Bioenergetic stabilization</td>
<td>Effects are secondary to improved circulation and systemic conditioning.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Oxidative stress</td>
<td>ROS markers ↓ (reported in some models)</td>
<td>Redox balance support</td>
<td>R, G</td>
<td>Antioxidant modulation</td>
<td>Likely secondary to anti-inflammatory and vascular improvements.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Sarcopenia / frailty axis</td>
<td>Muscle strength ↑; fall risk ↓</td>
<td>Neuromuscular activation ↑</td>
<td>G</td>
<td>Functional resilience</td>
<td>Indirectly important in AD due to frailty-cognition relationship.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Amyloid / tau pathology</td>
<td>Limited direct evidence; possible indirect modulation</td>
<td>↔</td>
<td>G</td>
<td>Uncertain disease-modifying effect</td>
<td>No strong evidence for direct Aβ or tau clearance; effects likely indirect.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Clinical cognitive outcomes</td>
<td>Small improvements reported in mobility and executive function</td>
<td>↔</td>
<td>G</td>
<td>Adjunct cognitive support</td>
<td>Human trials are small and exploratory; not established therapy.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Safety considerations</td>
<td>Caution in advanced frailty, severe osteoporosis</td>
<td>Generally safe when supervised</td>
<td>—</td>
<td>Clinical constraint</td>
<td>Protocol must be individualized; fall risk assessment required.</td>
</tr>

</table>

<p><small>
TSF: P = immediate vascular activation; R = inflammatory and signaling shifts; G = long-term neuroplastic and functional adaptations.
</small></p>


Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis

GlucoseCon↝, 1,  

Cell Death

Apoptosis↑, 1,   Fas↑, 1,   TumCD↑, 1,   YAP/TEAD↑, 1,  

Transcription & Epigenetics

other↓, 4,   other↑, 2,   tumCV∅, 1,   UrinaryC↑, 1,   Wmax↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State

Piezo1↑, 1,   TumCG↓, 1,   TumCG∅, 1,  

Migration

Ca+2↑, 1,   TumCI↓, 3,   TumMeta↑, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling

COX2↑, 1,  

Hormonal & Nuclear Receptors

RANKL↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance

Dose?, 1,   Dose∅, 5,   Dose↝, 1,   Dose↑, 1,   eff↑, 6,   eff∅, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers

BMD↑, 2,  

Functional Outcomes

Pain↓, 1,   QoL↑, 1,   Risk↓, 1,   Strength↑, 2,  
Total Targets: 29

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells

Clinical Biomarkers

BMD↑, 1,   BP∅, 1,  

Functional Outcomes

toxicity∅, 2,  
Total Targets: 3

Research papers

Year Title Authors PMID Link Flag
2024Molecular jackhammers eradicate cancer cells by vibronic-driven actionCiceron Ayala-Orozcohttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41557-023-01383-y0
2023Vibration Therapy for Cancer-Related Bone DiseasesXin Songhttps://www.mdpi.com/2571-631X/6/2/280
2022Yoda1 Enhanced Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration on Osteocytes in Regulation of MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cell MigrationChun-Yu LinPMC9324638https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9324638/0
2022Reduction of breast cancer extravasation via vibration activated osteocyte regulationXin SongPMC9676352https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9676352/0
2021Physical Exercise with or without Whole-Body Vibration in Breast Cancer Patients Suffering from Aromatase Inhibitor—Induced Musculoskeletal Symptoms: A Pilot Randomized Clinical StudyAlessandro de SirePMC8707128https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8707128/0
2020Low-frequency mechanical vibration induces apoptosis of A431 epidermoid carcinoma cellsWresti L. Anggayastihttps://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/elsc.2019001540
2019The Impact of Vibration Therapy Interventions on Skin Condition and Skin Temperature Changes in Young Women with Lipodystrophy: A Pilot StudyWanda PilchPMC6560364https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6560364/0
2018Whole body vibration exercise in the management of cancer therapy-related morbidities: A systematic reviewPatrícia Lopes-Souza30224596https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30224596/0
2018Feasibility of whole body vibration during intensive chemotherapy in patients with hematological malignancies – a randomized controlled pilot studyAntonia PahlPMC6156963https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6156963/0
2017Low Intensity Vibration Mitigates Tumor Progression and Protect Bone Quantity and Quality in a Murine Model of MyelomaGabriel M PagnottiPMC4970889https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4970889/0
2014Whole-body vibration in breast cancer survivors: a pilot study exploring its effects on muscle activity and subjectively perceived exertionBarbara Van Ruymbeke25153791https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25153791/0
2014Prostate cancer and occupational exposure to whole-body vibration in a national population-based cohort studyMarcella K Jones24965268https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24965268/0