Ferulic acid / DRP1/DNM1L Cancer Research Results

FA, Ferulic acid: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Ferulic acid is an antioxidant found in some skin creams and serums.
Foods: popcorn, bamboo, whole-grain rye bread, whole-grain oat flakes, sweet corn (cooked)
Ferulic acid (FA) is a hydroxycinnamic acid abundant in plant cell walls (notably cereals/whole grains) with strong antioxidant and cytoprotective activity. Mechanistically, FA is frequently described as inducing Nrf2/HO-1 antioxidant programs and suppressing NF-κB-linked inflammation, with additional model-dependent anticancer effects (cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, reduced invasion). Oral exposure is variable because FA is rapidly metabolized (often as conjugates) and bioaccessibility depends on the food matrix.

-Ferulic acid found in dietary strand fractions, especially its free form, has important functions for protecting the human health.
-AChE inhibitor (AD)
-Cooking results in an increase in free ferulic acid quantity and in a reduction in bound ferulic acid quantity.
Bamboo shoots       243.6 mg/100g
Sugar-beet pulp     800 mg/100g
Popcorn             313 mg/100g
Wheat bran	    500–1500mg/100g
Whole wheat flour   100–300mg/100g
            
Type of corn p-coumaric acidferulic acid
   mg/kg, DW mg/kg, DW
Yellow dent 18.9 265
American blue N.D. 927
Mexican blue 1.3 202
white 6.6 2484
Pathway / Target	Modulation by FA / Direction
Aβ aggregation	         ↓ Inhibits fibril formation and destabilizes existing Aβ fibrils 
BACE‑1 & APP	         ↓ Reduces BACE-1 and APP expression; ↑ MMP‑2/‑9 expression promoting Aβ clearance
Tau hyperphosphorylation  Implicitly ↓ through modulation of Ca²⁺/CDK5/GSK3β pathways
Ca²⁺         	         ↓ FA lowers STEP levels via chelation of Ca²⁺, suppressing PP2B → restores synaptic plasticity
(AChE / BChE)	         ↓ Inhibition of AChE (FA IC₅₀~15 µM, derivatives IC₅₀ down to 0.006 µM); also BChE
(MAO‑A/B)	         ↓ Inhibits MAO‑B (derivatives IC₅₀ ~0.3–0.7 µM), reducing ROS
ROS                      ↓ Scavenges ROS, enhances antioxidant enzymes (e.g., catalase), ↓ MDA
(COX‑2, 5‑LOX, NLRP3)	 ↓ Derivatives inhibit COX‑2/5‑LOX; derivative 13a ↓ NLRP3 inflammasome
Iron/Cu²⁺ chelation	 ↓ Metal-induced Aβ aggregation via chelation by FA and derivatives
Autophagy & Aβ clearance  ↗ Suggested promotion of autophagy mechanisms targeting Aβ

Ferulic acid — Ferulic acid is a naturally occurring hydroxycinnamic phenolic acid concentrated in plant cell walls, particularly in cereal bran, whole grains, rice bran, corn, oats, wheat, bamboo shoots, and some fruits and vegetables. It is formally classified as a dietary polyphenol and phenolic antioxidant; the standard abbreviation is FA. Most food-derived FA is ester-linked to arabinoxylans, lignin, and other structural polysaccharides, whereas free FA is more readily absorbed. FA has predominantly antioxidant and cytoprotective activity in normal tissues, but can produce antiproliferative, pro-oxidant, mitochondrial, apoptotic, pyroptotic, and anti-invasive effects in susceptible cancer models. It is not an approved anticancer drug.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Induction of cancer-cell growth arrest and mitochondrial cell death through suppression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR, STAT3, cyclins, and CDKs, with activation of p53, p21, BAX, caspases, and related stress pathways.
  2. Context-dependent redox disruption in cancer cells, including ROS accumulation, glutathione and antioxidant-enzyme depletion, mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, and ROS/JNK/BAX-dependent apoptosis or pyroptosis.
  3. Suppression of EMT, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis through modulation of MMP2, MMP9, VEGF, β-catenin/ZEB1, vimentin, E-cadherin, NF-κB, and related pathways.
  4. Inhibition of glycolytic and anabolic signalling, including reductions in c-MYC, PKM2, LDH, CAIX, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and tumor-associated glycolysis in selected models.
  5. Modulation of DNA-damage responses and cell-cycle checkpoints, including ATM, ATR, CHK1/2, γH2AX, p53, p21, CDC25, CDK2, CDK4/6, and cyclin D1.
  6. Suppression of tumor-promoting inflammatory signalling, particularly NF-κB, COX-2, JAK2/STAT3, inflammatory cytokines, and related mediators.
  7. NRF2/HO-1 and direct radical-scavenging activity are central to normal-cell protection but are secondary and context-dependent in cancer, where antioxidant signalling could theoretically protect some tumors from oxidative therapies.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Orally administered FA is absorbed from the stomach and small intestine, with additional release and microbial conversion of cereal-bound FA in the colon. It undergoes rapid first-pass glucuronidation, sulfation, methylation, and glycine conjugation; circulating material is predominantly conjugated rather than free FA. Food-matrix binding is a major constraint: free FA and processed or enzymatically released FA are more bioavailable than intact bran-bound FA. Human cereal studies have reported free or equivalent plasma concentrations in the low-nanomolar range, while pharmacokinetic results from herbal mixtures cannot be directly extrapolated to purified FA. Nanoencapsulation, phospholipid carriers, ester derivatives, and enzymatic liberation from bran can increase exposure experimentally, but none is established for oncology.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Most anticancer experiments use approximately 25–500 µM FA, with many cytotoxic effects occurring at 100 µM or higher. These concentrations substantially exceed the low-nanomolar free FA levels typically observed after ordinary dietary intake and likely exceed sustained free systemic exposure achievable with conventional oral preparations. Therefore, direct systemic tumor cytotoxicity from dietary FA is pharmacokinetically implausible. Local gastrointestinal exposure, metabolites, repeated dosing, formulated delivery, or pharmacological derivatives may be more relevant than plasma free-FA concentrations.

Clinical evidence status: Cancer evidence is preclinical, consisting mainly of cultured cancer cells and rodent xenograft or carcinogenesis models. There are no established oncology RCTs showing tumor response, progression-free survival, or overall-survival benefit from purified FA. Radiosensitization and chemosensitization have been reported experimentally, but FA also protects normal tissues from radiation and chemotherapy injury; the net interaction is treatment-, timing-, dose-, and tissue-dependent. Human evidence is limited mainly to dietary bioavailability, topical dermatology, cardiovascular or metabolic observations, and combination supplements studied in cognitive impairment. FA should not be classified as a clinically validated anticancer therapy.

Ferulic Acid Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 PI3K AKT mTOR survival signalling PI3K ↓; AKT ↓; mTOR ↓; PTEN ↑ (model-dependent) AKT ↔ or ↑ during injury protection R, G Growth inhibition and apoptosis sensitization A recurrent anticancer axis, although direction in normal stressed tissue may differ from that in malignant cells.
2 Mitochondrial apoptosis Mitochondrial membrane potential ↓; BAX ↑; BCL-2 ↓; cytochrome c release ↑; caspase-9 ↑; caspase-3 ↑; apoptosis ↑ Mitochondrial injury ↓; apoptosis ↓ under toxic or inflammatory stress R, G Intrinsic cell-death execution Common downstream phenotype in susceptible cancer models; frequently concentration- and cell-line-dependent.
3 Cancer-cell ROS and pyroptotic stress ROS ↑; JNK ↑; BAX ↑; GSDMD processing ↑; apoptosis or pyroptosis ↑ (model-dependent) ROS ↓; lipid peroxidation ↓; oxidative injury ↓ P, R, G Selective redox overload FA is not uniformly antioxidant in cancer. A ROS/JNK/BAX/GSDMD mechanism has been reported in lung-cancer models, but is not established across tumor types.
4 Cell-cycle checkpoint control p53 ↑; p21 ↑; CHK1/2 ↑; CDC25 ↓; CDK2 ↓; CDK4/6 ↓; cyclin D1 ↓; arrest ↑ G Cytostasis The specific arrest phase varies among models and may include G0/G1, S-phase, or G2/M accumulation.
5 EMT invasion and metastasis EMT ↓; MMP2 ↓; MMP9 ↓; vimentin ↓; β-catenin/ZEB1 ↓; migration ↓; invasion ↓ G Anti-invasive and antimetastatic phenotype Supported principally by cell migration assays and animal tumor models rather than clinical evidence.
6 NF-κB inflammatory signalling NF-κB ↓; COX-2 ↓; inflammatory cytokines ↓; survival signalling ↓ NF-κB ↓; COX-2 ↓; iNOS ↓; TNF-α ↓; IL-1β ↓; IL-6 ↓ R, G Reduced inflammation and tumor-promoting signalling This mechanism is more consistently protective and anti-inflammatory than directly cytotoxic.
7 Glycolysis and anabolic metabolism c-MYC ↓; PKM2 ↓; LDH ↓; CAIX ↓; glycolysis ↓ (model-dependent) G Metabolic growth restriction Potentially important in highly glycolytic tumors but supported by fewer models than apoptosis and cell-cycle regulation.
8 STAT and growth-factor signalling JAK2 ↓; phosphorylated STAT3 ↓; STAT6 ↓; FGFR1 ↓; FGFR2 ↓; proliferation ↓ R, G Suppression of proliferative transcription Individual targets are tumor-model-specific and should not be treated as universal direct molecular targets of FA.
9 Angiogenesis VEGF ↓; angiogenesis ↓ VEGF ↔ or ↑ during tissue repair (context-dependent) G Reduced tumor vascular support Potentially opposite modulation in ischemic or reparative normal tissue illustrates the context dependence of FA.
10 DNA damage response ATM ↑; ATR ↑; CHK1/2 ↑; γH2AX ↑; DNA damage ↑ (high concentration only) DNA oxidative damage ↓ R, G Checkpoint activation and tumor-cell death At pharmacological concentrations, FA may promote cancer-cell stress while protecting normal DNA through antioxidant activity.
11 NRF2 HO-1 antioxidant response NRF2 ↔ or ↑ (context-dependent); possible tumor stress adaptation NRF2 ↑; ARE ↑; HO-1 ↑; NQO1 ↑; GCLC ↑; GCLM ↑; GSH ↑ R, G Endogenous antioxidant defence A core cytoprotective mechanism in normal tissues but not necessarily therapeutically favourable in NRF2-dependent tumors.
12 Mitochondrial dynamics and tissue protection Not consistently defined DRP1 ↓; FIS1 ↓; MFN1 ↑; MFN2 ↑; OPA1 ↑; mitochondrial damage ↓ R, G Preservation of mitochondrial integrity Reported mainly in toxic, metabolic, cardiovascular, or neurological injury models.
13 Radiosensitization and radioprotection Radiosensitization ↑ in selected models; DNA damage and apoptosis ↑ (model-dependent) Radiation-induced ROS ↓; inflammation ↓; tissue injury ↓; radioprotection ↑ R, G Bidirectional radiation interaction Timing and tissue selectivity are critical. Normal-tissue radioprotection does not establish improved tumor control and could theoretically reduce efficacy under some conditions.
14 Chemosensitization and treatment toxicity Chemosensitivity ↑ in selected drug and cell-line combinations Chemotherapy-associated oxidative or inflammatory injury ↓ R, G Adjunct modulation No standardized human oncology dosing or validated treatment combination has been established.
15 Clinical Translation Constraint Free systemic FA exposure is far below many cytotoxic in-vitro concentrations Rapid conjugation; matrix-dependent absorption; generally dietary exposure Limited systemic anticancer translation Most experiments use tens to hundreds of micromolar FA, whereas human dietary exposure produces predominantly conjugated metabolites and low free plasma concentrations.

P: 0–30 min    R: 30 min–3 hr    G: >3 hr



Alzheimer’s disease relevance: Ferulic acid has substantial preclinical relevance to Alzheimer’s disease through direct inhibition of amyloid-β aggregation, attenuation of APP and BACE1 processing, reduction of tau phosphorylation, suppression of neuroinflammation and oxidative injury, metal chelation, preservation of mitochondrial function, and modulation of cholinergic signalling. FA and several FA-derived multifunctional compounds inhibit AChE or BChE in vitro, but the potency of derivatives should not be attributed to unmodified FA. Small human studies have evaluated combination products containing FA and Angelica archangelica extract in mild cognitive impairment or dementia-related symptoms; these do not establish efficacy of isolated FA or demonstrate disease modification. The clinical evidence remains preliminary and formulation-specific.

AD clinical evidence status: Strong preclinical evidence; limited small human combination-product studies; no confirmatory phase III trial; no regulatory approval for prevention or treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Reported cognitive findings require replication using isolated FA, adequate sample sizes, biomarker-defined populations, validated dosing, and longer follow-up.

Ferulic Acid in Alzheimer’s Disease

Rank Pathway / Axis Modulation TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Amyloid beta aggregation Aβ oligomerization ↓; fibril formation ↓; existing fibril stability ↓ P, R Reduced amyloid aggregation Direct anti-aggregation effects are demonstrated mainly in biochemical and cellular systems at concentrations not clearly achieved in human brain tissue.
2 APP BACE1 amyloid production APP ↓; BACE1 ↓; amyloidogenic processing ↓ G Reduced Aβ generation Supported mainly by cellular and animal models.
3 Oxidative stress and NRF2 HO-1 ROS ↓; lipid peroxidation ↓; NRF2 ↑; HO-1 ↑; NQO1 ↑; GSH ↑; antioxidant enzymes ↑ P, R, G Neuronal redox protection One of the most consistent neuroprotective mechanisms across toxicant and neurodegeneration models.
4 Neuroinflammation NF-κB ↓; NLRP3 ↓; COX-2 ↓; iNOS ↓; TNF-α ↓; IL-1β ↓; IL-6 ↓ R, G Reduced inflammatory neuronal injury Predominantly demonstrated in animal and glial-cell models.
5 Tau kinase and phosphatase balance GSK3β activity ↓; CDK5 dysregulation ↓; tau hyperphosphorylation ↓ (model-dependent) R, G Reduced tau pathology The exact upstream mechanism varies and may involve calcium signalling, AKT, ERK, and oxidative-stress regulation.
6 Cholinergic signalling AChE ↓; BChE ↓; acetylcholine availability ↑; ChAT ↑ (model-dependent) P, R, G Improved cholinergic transmission Unmodified FA is generally less potent than optimized FA derivatives; derivative potency must be recorded separately.
7 Mitochondrial function Mitochondrial ROS ↓; membrane-potential loss ↓; ATP preservation ↑; DRP1 ↓; FIS1 ↓; MFN1 and MFN2 ↑ R, G Preserved neuronal bioenergetics Evidence derives mainly from oxidative, toxicant, and ischemic injury models.
8 Calcium dependent synaptic dysfunction Pathological Ca²⁺ signalling ↓; calcineurin PP2B signalling ↓; STEP ↓ (model-dependent) P, R Preserved synaptic plasticity The description of FA as directly chelating neuronal calcium should be used cautiously; pathway modulation is better supported than clinically meaningful systemic calcium chelation.
9 Metal associated amyloid toxicity Iron and Cu²⁺ coordination ↑; metal-driven ROS and Aβ aggregation ↓ P, R Reduced metal-mediated oxidative aggregation Most evidence is biochemical. Brain exposure sufficient for clinically meaningful chelation has not been established.
10 Autophagy and proteostasis Autophagic clearance ↔ or ↑ (model-dependent); Aβ clearance ↑ G Improved aggregate disposal Autophagy findings are inconsistent and should not be represented as a universal FA mechanism.
11 Clinical Translation Constraint Brain exposure uncertain; extensive conjugation; human evidence derived largely from combination products Unproven disease modification No validated isolated-FA dose, target-engagement biomarker, or confirmatory Alzheimer’s disease trial is available.

P: 0–30 min    R: 30 min–3 hr    G: >3 hr



DRP1/DNM1L, DRP1 / DNM1L — mitochondrial fission regulator: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:

DRP1 / DNM1L

Item Description
Target name DRP1 / DNM1L
Full name Dynamin-related protein 1; Dynamin-1-like protein
Gene DNM1L
Primary function Core GTPase regulator of mitochondrial fission; also involved in peroxisomal division, mitosis-linked mitochondrial remodeling, mitophagy, apoptosis regulation, and mitochondrial quality control.
Target class Mitochondrial dynamics / mitochondrial fission / metabolic stress response target
Main disease logic Pathological DRP1 activation can drive excessive mitochondrial fragmentation, impaired oxidative phosphorylation, ROS production, calcium stress, mitophagy imbalance, inflammatory signaling, and cell survival adaptation.
Preferred modulation direction Inhibit excessive DRP1 activation or disrupt pathological DRP1-FIS1 signaling; avoid complete suppression of basal mitochondrial fission.
Key adaptors / related targets FIS1, MFF, MiD49, MiD51, OPA1, MFN1, MFN2, PINK1, PRKN/Parkin
Major caution DRP1 is required for normal mitochondrial maintenance, mitosis, neuronal function, and stress adaptation. Global inhibition could impair normal mitochondrial quality control.

Cancer relevance

Aspect Cancer relevance Likely Desired Direction
Proliferation Many cancer models show increased DRP1-mediated fission supporting mitochondrial redistribution, mitosis, and rapid growth. Down / inhibit excessive DRP1
Metabolic adaptation DRP1 can support metabolic remodeling, mitochondrial fragmentation, altered oxidative phosphorylation, glycolytic adaptation, and survival under stress. Down in DRP1-dependent tumors
Migration / invasion / metastasis DRP1-driven mitochondrial fission can support motility and invasive behavior by changing mitochondrial distribution and energy availability. Down
Cancer stemness / tumor-initiating cells DRP1 and the DRP1-FIS1 axis are implicated in tumor-initiating cell expansion and aggressive phenotypes in some cancers. Down
Therapy resistance Excessive mitochondrial fission may contribute to resistance to chemotherapy, radiation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis depending on tumor type. Down or context-specific
Apoptosis caveat DRP1 can also participate in apoptosis-associated mitochondrial fragmentation. Therefore, indiscriminate DRP1 blockade could theoretically reduce apoptosis in some contexts. Context-dependent
Database cancer rating High mechanistic relevance; strongest as a mitochondrial-stress, invasion, tumor stemness, and therapy-resistance target. Translational status remains preclinical. Add as cancer target

Alzheimer's disease relevance

Aspect Alzheimer's disease relevance Likely Desired Direction
Aβ toxicity Aβ has been reported to interact with DRP1 and promote excessive mitochondrial fission, ROS generation, energetic failure, and synaptic dysfunction. Down / inhibit excessive DRP1
Tau pathology Hyperphosphorylated tau is linked to abnormal mitochondrial dynamics and may worsen DRP1-associated mitochondrial fragmentation. Down
Synaptic function Excessive DRP1 activation can impair mitochondrial transport, ATP availability, and synaptic maintenance. Down
Oxidative stress DRP1-associated mitochondrial fragmentation can increase ROS and reduce mitochondrial membrane potential and respiratory efficiency. Down
Neuroinflammation Altered DRP1 activation has been linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammatory signaling, including NLRP3-related pathways in AD models. Down / normalize
Therapeutic strategy Selective inhibition of pathological DRP1-FIS1 interaction, such as with P110-like strategies, is more attractive than complete DRP1 inhibition. Normalize fission
Database AD rating High mechanistic relevance; strong preclinical rationale for AD mitochondrial dysfunction, Aβ/tau toxicity, ROS, synaptic failure, and neuroinflammation. No established clinical DRP1-directed AD therapy. Add as AD target

Modulators / tool compounds

Compound / Strategy Mechanism Database Note
P110 peptide Selective inhibitor of pathological DRP1-FIS1 interaction; designed to reduce excessive fission while sparing basal fission. Useful reference tool compound; preclinical, not a general supplement or approved therapy.
Mdivi-1 Historically used as a DRP1/fission inhibitor, but has important off-target effects including mitochondrial complex I inhibition. Use cautiously in database notes; not a clean DRP1-specific probe.
Genetic DNM1L knockdown / inhibition Reduces DRP1 expression or activity and can suppress mitochondrial fission in experimental systems. Mechanistic research tool only.
Targeting DRP1-FIS1 axis Blocks a pathological receptor interaction involved in excessive fission. Probably the most attractive disease-modifying approach for AD and some cancers.

Overall conclusion

In cancer, DRP1 is mainly relevant to proliferation, invasion, tumor-initiating cells, metabolic adaptation, and therapy resistance. In Alzheimer's disease, DRP1 is mainly relevant to excessive mitochondrial fission, Aβ/tau toxicity, oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, energetic failure, and neuroinflammation. The preferred therapeutic logic is normalization or selective inhibition of pathological DRP1 activation, especially DRP1-FIS1 signaling, rather than complete blockade of mitochondrial fission.



Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
6416- CUR,  QC,  FA,  RES,  EGCG  Natural products targeting mitochondria: emerging therapeutics for age-associated neurological disorders
- Review, AD, NA
*DRP1/DNM1L↓, *FIS1↓, *MFN2↑, *OPA1↑, *DRP1/DNM1L↓, *FIS1↓, *OPA1↑, *MFN1↑, *MFN2↑, *DRP1/DNM1L↓, *FIS1↓, *MFN1↑, *MFN2↑, *memory↑, *mtDam↓, *DRP1/DNM1L↓, *FIS1↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Total Targets: 0

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

MFN1↑, 2,   MFN2↑, 3,   OPA1↑, 2,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics(tgid=3)

DRP1/DNM1L↓, 4,   FIS1↓, 4,   mtDam↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23)

memory↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 7

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: DRP1/DNM1L, DRP1 / DNM1L — mitochondrial fission regulator
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:77  Target#:1487  State#:%  Dir#:1
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page