Apoptosis Cancer Research Results
Apoptosis, Apoptosis: Click to Expand ⟱
| Source: |
| Type: type of cell death |
Situation in which a cell actively pursues a course toward death upon receiving certain stimuli.
Cancer is one of the scenarios where too little apoptosis occurs, resulting in malignant cells that will not die.
|
Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
Glycolysis↓, 2-DG inhibits glycolysis due to formation and intracellular accumulation of 2-deoxy-d-glucose-6-phosphate (2-DG6P), inhibiting the function of hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, and inducing cell death
HK2↓,
mt-ROS↑, 2-DG-mediated glucose deprivation stimulates reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in mitochondria, also leading to AMPK activation and autophagy stimulation.
AMPK↑,
PPP↓, 2-DG has been shown to block the pentose phosphate shunt
NADPH↓, Decreased levels of NADPH correlate with reduced glutathione levels, one of the major cellular antioxidants.
GSH↓,
Bax:Bcl2↑, Valera et al. also observed that in bladder cancer cells, 2-DG treatment modulates the Bcl-2/Bax protein ratio, driving apoptosis induction
Apoptosis↑,
RadioS↑, 2-DG radiosensitization results from its effect on thiol metabolism
eff↓, (NAC) treatment, downregulated glutamate cysteine ligase activity, or overexpression of ROS scavenging enzymes
Half-Life↓, its plasma half-life was only 48 min [117]) make 2-DG a rather poor drug candidate
other↝, Adverse effects of 2-DG administration in humans include fatigue, sweating, dizziness, and nausea, mimicking the symptoms of hypoglycemia
eff↓, Moreover, 2-DG has to be used at relatively high concentrations (≥5 mmol/L) in order to compete with blood glucose
| - |
in-vitro, |
Lung, |
H23 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Lung, |
KP2 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vivo, |
NA, |
NA |
|
|
|
HK2↓, 2-DG, an inhibitor of HK2, inhibited human and mouse lung cancer cell growth through inducing cell apoptosis and autophagy.
Apoptosis↑,
TumAuto↑,
TumCG↓, these studies showed that the 2-DG, HK2 inhibitor, suppresses lung cancer cell growth in vivo.
| - |
in-vitro, |
CRC, |
DLD1 |
|
|
|
- |
NA, |
NA, |
HCT116 |
|
|
|
eff↑, Our results demonstrated that the co-treatment of 3-BP and cetuximab synergistically induced an antiproliferative effect in both CRC cell lines
Ferroptosis↓, co-treatment induced ferroptosis, autophagy, and apoptosis.
TumAuto↑,
Apoptosis↑,
FOXO3↑, co-treatment inhibited FOXO3a phosphorylation and degradation and activated the FOXO3a/AMPKα/pBeclin1 and FOXO3a/PUMA pathways, leading to the promotion of ferroptosis, autophagy, and apoptosis in DLD-1
AMPKα↑,
p‑Beclin-1↑,
HK2↓, 3-Bromopyruvate (3-BP), also known as hexokinase II inhibitor II, has shown promise as an anticancer agent against various types of cancer
ATP↓, 3-BP exerts its anticancer effects by manipulating cell energy metabolism and regulating oxidative stress, as evidenced by the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [13,14,15,16].
ROS↑,
Dose↝, Eight days postinoculation, xenografted mice were randomly divided into four groups and intraperitoneally injected with PBS, 3-BP, cetuximab, or a combination of 3-BP and cetuximab every four days for five injections.
TumVol↓, 3-BP alone or co-treatment with 3-BP and cetuximab significantly reduced the tumor volume and tumor weight on Day 28, but co-treatment showed a greater reduction than 3-BP alone
TumW↓,
xCT↑, The protein level of SLC7A11 was significantly upregulated in all three cell lines following co-treatment (Fig. 2B).
GSH↓, co-treatment with 3-BP and cetuximab led to glutathione (GSH) depletion (Fig. 2D), reactive oxygen species (ROS) production
eff↓, Knockdown of either ATG5 or Beclin1 attenuated the cell death and MDA production induced by co-treatment
MDA↑,
toxicity↑, 3-Bromopyruvate (3BP), a small alkylating
agent, acts as an anti-metabolite to vital substrates in cancer metabolism and exhibits antitumor activity
across various cancer types, but the unformulated 3BP can cause high toxicity
eff↝, This study explores the efficacy of the 3BP clinical derivative KAT/3BP, currently in phase 1 for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, in lymphoma models.
eff↑, AT/3BP exhibited synergistic activity when combined with lymphoma therapies, including bendamustine and R-CHOP.
Glycolysis↓, At acidic extracellular pH, 3BP enters cancer cells via monocarboxylic acid-1 (MCT-1) and inhibits glycolysis
through hexokinase II (HK-2) covalent modification
HK2↓, with HK-2 inhibition and dissociation from mitochondria, apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) release, and apoptosis induction (9).
AIF↑,
Apoptosis↑,
NK cell↑, In the latter, tumor growth was in vivo reversed, with an increase in the number of circulating CD4+, CD8+, and NK-
cells
toxicity↑, unformulated 3BP administrations are associated with severe toxicities, including deaths (22,23)
toxicity↓, However, improvements have been made in developing novel 3BP formulations based on
liposomes, polyethylene glycol (PEG), PEGylated liposomes (stealth liposomes), perillyl alcohol
formulations, and others (12,22,24
Dose↝, KAT-101 and KAT-201 are two clinical 3BP derivatives formulated for oral or intratumoral (IT) administration, respectively (National Cancer Institute Thesaurus Codes C193479 and
C193479), now entering the early clinical evaluation of patients with h
AntiTum↑, KAT/3BP has in vivo antitumor activity in a syngeneic mouse model.
Glycolysis↓, Under acidic extracellular pH, 3BP is transported into cancer cells via monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1), inhibiting glycolysis by covalently modifying hexokinase II (HK2).
HK2↓, HK2 dissociation from mitochondria, release of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), and induction of apoptosis
AIF↓,
Apoptosis↑,
NK cell↑, In the latter, tumor regression was accompanied by increased circulating CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells, enhanced tumor-associated macrophage infiltration, and reduced local immunosuppression
eff↑, Upon oral administration of 3-BP-based agent KAT-101, the 3-BP derivative, being structurally similar to lactic acid, specifically binds to and enters cancer cells through monocarboxylic acid transporters (MCTs)
Glycolysis↓, KAT-101 interferes with both glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos), thereby depleting adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels and thus limits energy supply needed by cancer cells to proliferate.
OXPHOS↓,
ATP↓,
TumCP↓,
Apoptosis↑, This induces cancer cell apoptosis and prevents cancer cell proliferation.
HK2↓, In addition, KAT-101 is able to release mitochondrial-bound hexokinase (HK) II (HK2)
MPT↑, increases the formation of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (MPTPs), which induces apoptosis.
LDH↓, KAT-101 also inhibits a variety of enzymes, including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDHK).
PDH↓,
other↝, Since the use of ALA-based drugs for tumor diagnosis or therapy depends on preferential PpIX tumor accumulation, we begin this review with an overview of PpIX biosynthesis from ALA and end with the prospect of combining the diagnostic and therapeutic
ROS↑, These components individually are not harmful but become cytotoxic when combined due to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via type I and II photochemical reactions.
other↝, ALA was known to cause endogenous PpIX accumulation in human lymphocytes in the 1970s [15].
mtDam↑, which causes direct mitochondrial structural damage and Ca2+ release [24].
Ca+2↑,
ER Stress↑, ALA-PDT is known to damage the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and cause Ca2+ release, triggering apoptosis through ER-stress signaling [25].
Apoptosis↑,
TumAuto↑, Lastly, ALA-PDT is also known to induce autophagy, the degradation of cellular components by lysosomes.
other↝, ALA administration exhibits red fluorescence and photosensitizing activity upon light activation.
Dose↝, Although blue and red light-emitting diode (LED) illuminators are commonly used as the light source to activate ALA and MAL for PDT of AK lesions, natural daylight is emerging as an attractive and convenient alternative.
Imm↑, ALA-PDT not only directly kills tumor cells but also elicits potent immune responses with important implications in the long-term therapeutic outcome.
OXPHOS↑, A549 exposed to ALA exhibited enhanced oxidative phosphorylation, which was indicated by an increase in COX protein expression and oxygen consumption.
OCR↑,
Warburg↓, These data demonstrate that ALA inhibits the Warburg effect and induces cancer cell death.
ROS↑, ALA significantly increased O2-generation
over 4 h
SOD2↑, ALA stimulates MnSOD, catalase and HO-1 protein expression.
Catalase↑,
HO-1↑,
Casp3↑, ALA induced an increase in the protein expression
of activated (cleaved) caspase-3.
Apoptosis↑, these data demonstrate that ALA induced caspase-
dependent apoptosis in A549 cells.
AntiCan↑, All treatments resulted in anticancer effects depicted by cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, with TQ demonstrating greater efficacy than CQ10, both with and without 5-FU.
TumCCA↑,
Apoptosis↑,
eff↑,
Bcl-2↓, However, 5-FU/TQ/CQ10 triple therapy exhibited the most potent pro-apoptotic activity in all cell lines, portrayed by the lowest levels of oncogenes (CCND1, CCND3, BCL2, and survivin)
survivin↓,
P21↑, and the highest upregulation of tumour suppressors (p21, p27, BAX, Cytochrome-C, and Cas-
pase-3).
p27↑,
BAX↑,
Cyt‑c↑,
Casp3↑,
PI3K↓, The triple therapy also showed the strongest suppression of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR/HIF1α pathway, with a concurrent increase in its endogenous inhibitors (PTEN and AMPKα) in all cell lines used.
Akt↓,
mTOR↓,
Hif1a↓,
PTEN↑,
AMPKα↑,
PDH↑, triple therapy favoured glucose oxidation by upregulating PDH, while decreasing LDHA and PDHK1 enzymes.
LDHA↓,
antiOx↓, most significant decline in antioxidant levels and the highest increases in oxidative stress markers
ROS↑,
AntiCan↑, This study is the first to demonstrate the superior anticancer effects of TQ compared to CQ10, with and without 5-FU, in CRC treatment.
ROS↑, AF primarily functions as a pro-oxidant by inhibiting thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), an antioxidant enzyme overexpressed in ovarian cancer.
TrxR↓, The primary mechanism of action of auranofin is to act as a pro-oxidative agent, increasing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a consequence of inhibiting the thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) anti-oxidant system
MMP↓, triggers the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, and kills HGSOC cells by inducing apoptosis.
Apoptosis↑,
eff↓, Notably, AF-induced cell death was abrogated by the ROS-scavenger N-acetyl cysteine (NAC).
Casp3↑, lethality of AF was associated with the activation of caspases-3/7 and the generation of DNA damage
Casp7↑,
DNAdam↑,
eff↑, Finally, when AF and L-BSO were combined, we observed synergistic lethality against HGSOC cells, which was mediated by a further increase in ROS and a decrease in the levels of the antioxidant GSH.
GSH↓,
angioG↓, Additionally, auranofin has been shown to inhibit angiogenesis
ChemoSen↑, In this study, we identified the mechanisms of cytotoxicity induced by auranofin in HGSOC cells that have different clinical sensitivities to platinum.
cl‑PARP↑, the cleavage of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP), and the polyubiquitination of proteins
eff↑, synergistic lethal interaction between auranofin and a second pro-oxidant agent, the glutathione (GSH) inhibitor, L-buthionine sulfoximine (L-BSO);
IL6↓, This gold(I) compound has anti-inflammatory properties because it reduces IL-6 expression via inhibition of the NF-κB-IL-6-STAT3 signaling pathway.
NF-kB↓,
ATF2↓,
TrxR↓, by inhibiting redox enzymes such as thioredoxin reductase, auranofin increases cellular oxidative stress and promotes apoptosis.
ROS↑,
Apoptosis↑,
IL6↓, Recently, it was reported that auranofin reduced by 95% SARS-CoV-2 RNA in infected human cells in vitro and decreased SARS-CoV-2-induced cytokine expression, including IL-6.
Dose↑, After 14 days of treatment with 21 mg/day auranofin, plasma gold concentration reached 1.18 µM to 2.21 µM ‘auranofin equivalent’
AntiTum↑, Over the last twenty years, AF has also been repurposed as an antitumor, antiviral, and antibacterial drug.
Bacteria↓,
TrxR↓, ability to inhibit thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) and disrupt redox homeostasis, leading to selective cytotoxicity in cancer cells.
ChemoSen↑, synergistic effects observed when AF is combined with chemotherapeutics, targeted therapies, or immune modulators.
Dose↝, Patients received AF orally twice daily on days 1–28. atients received AF orally, 6 mg in the morning and 6 mg in the evening.
ROS↑, AF induces oxidative stress and apoptosis in cancer cells by disrupting redox homeostasis, while sirolimus inhibits mTOR signaling.
Apoptosis↑,
mTOR↓,
RadioS↑, AF at 3–10 μM is a potent radiosensitizer in vitro
ROS↑, . The first one is linked to an oxidative stress, as scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
eff↓, N-acetyl cysteine counteracted radiosensitization. (NAC)
mt-OCR↓, We also observed a decrease in mitochondrial oxygen consumption with spared oxygen acting as a radiosensitizer under hypoxic conditions.
DNAdam↑, Overall, radiosensitization was accompanied by ROS overproduction, mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage and apoptosis
Apoptosis↑,
TrxR↓, targeting thioredoxin reductase (TrxR)
eff↑, a simultaneous disruption of the thioredoxin and glutathione systems by the combination of AF and buthionine sulfoximine was shown to significantly improve tumor radioresponse.
TrxR↓, Auranofin (Au), an inhibitor of thioredoxin reductase, is a known anti‑cancer drug
AntiCan↑,
TumCG↓, Au inhibited the growth of HeLa cells with an IC50 of ~2 µM at 24 h.
Apoptosis↑, This agent induced apoptosis and necrosis, accompanied by the cleavage of poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential.
necrosis↑,
cl‑PARP↑,
MMP↓,
ROS↑, With respect to the levels of ROS and GSH, Au increased intracellular O2•- in the HeLa cells and induced GSH depletion.
GSH↓,
eff↓, The antioxidant, N‑acetyl cysteine, not only attenuated apoptosis and necrosis in the Au‑treated HeLa cells, but also decreased the levels of O2•- and GSH depletion in the cells.
TrxR↓, Auranofin mainly targets the anti-oxidative system catalyzed by thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), which protects the cell from oxidative stress and death in the cytoplasm and the mitochondria.
ROS↑, Inhibiting TrxR dysregulates the intracellular redox state causing increased intracellular reactive oxygen species levels, and stimulates cellular demise
eff↑, TrxR is over-expressed in many cancers as an adaptive mechanism for cancer cell proliferation, rendering it an attractive target for cancer therapy, and auranofin as a potential therapeutic agent for cancer.
Apoptosis↑, promotion of ASK-induced apoptosis, and blockage of cell growth, proliferation, and survival due to reduced AKT activity and NF-kB- and p53-mediated transcription.
TumCG↓,
TumCP↓,
Akt↓,
NF-kB↓,
DNAdam↑, DNA damage
eff↝, auranofin inhibits TrxR1 in a p53-independent manner
eff↓, Pre-treatment with NAC counteracted the cancer cell killing effects of auranofin,
PI3K↓, auranofin induces cytotoxicity in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer via the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
Akt↓,
mTOR↓,
Hif1a↓, auranofin inhibits the cancer cell response to hypoxia, demonstrated by a decrease in HIF-1 𝛼 expression and VEGF secretion upon auranofin treatment under hypoxic conditions
VEGF↓,
Casp3↑, auranofin was shown to induce caspase-3-mediated apoptosis in human ovarian carcinoma SKOV-3 cells
CSCs↓,
ATP↓, it was found that auranofin inhibits ABCG2 function by depleting cellular ATP via inhibition of glycolysis [96]
Glycolysis↓,
eff↑, auranofin synergizes with another Trx1 inhibitor, piperlongumine, in killing gastric cancer cells in association with ROS-mediated ER stress response and mitochondrial dysfunction.
eff↑, when the gold complex is combined with either selenite or tellurite [104]
MMP↓, Increased ROS induced by AUR causes decreased membrane potential in the mitochondrial membrane, resulting in a decrease in anti-apoptotic proteins, caspase-dependent cell death, and translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF)
AIF↑,
toxicity↓, Auranofin is considered safe for human use in treating rheumatoid arthritis; thus, this gold derivative can reach the clinic for other diseases relatively quickly and at a low cost
TumCP↓,
Apoptosis↑,
NF-kB↓,
p50↓,
cycD1/CCND1↓,
Bcl-xL↓,
ChemoSen↑, AS-IV can enhance paclitaxel-induced cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase
angioG↓,
ChemoSen↑, Enhances Sensitivity to Cisplatin
TumCI↓,
Apoptosis↑,
Symptoms↓,
PIK3CA↓,
Akt↓,
Bcl-2↓,
AntiTum↑,
Apoptosis↑,
Bcl-2↓,
BAX↑,
Casp3↑,
Casp9↑,
Bax:Bcl2↑, ratio of Bax to Bcl-2 was significantly enhanced by the APS to cisplatin
TumCG↓,
TumCCA↑, cell cycle arrest (G2 phase)
Apoptosis↑,
*IL2↑, in peripheral blood
*TNF-α↑, in peripheral blood
*IFN-γ↑, in peripheral blood
AntiTum↑, APS has been increasingly used in cancer therapy owing to its anti-tumor ability as it prevents the progression of prostate, liver, cervical, ovarian, and non-small-cell lung cancer by suppressing tumor cell growth and invasion and enhancing apoptosi
TumCG↓,
TumCI↓,
Apoptosis↑, after APS treatment, the apoptosis of HepG2 cells is accelerated (57).
Imm↑, APS enhances the sensitivity of tumors to antineoplastic agents and improves the body’s immunity
Bcl-2↓, Huang et al. proposed that APS induces H22 (a hepatocellular cancer [HCC] cell line) apoptosis by downregulating Bcl-2 and upregulating Bax expression (56).
BAX↑,
Wnt↓, downregulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.
β-catenin/ZEB1↓,
TumCG↓, APS effectively inhibited the growth of MDA-MB-231 (a human breast cancer [BC] cell line) graft tumor (58)
miR-133a-3p↑, apoptosis rate of human osteosarcoma MG63 cells increased owing to the upregulation of miR-133a and inactivation of the JNK signaling pathways (71).
JNK↓,
Fas↑, Li and Shen found that APS can induce apoptosis by activating the Fas death receptor pathway.
P53↑, Zhang et al. showed that APS could activate p53 and p21 and inhibit the expression of Notch1 and Notch3 in vitro, ultimately inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting their apoptosis
P21↑,
NOTCH1↓,
NOTCH3↓,
TumCP↓,
TumCCA↑, Liu et al. found that APS induced the cell cycle of bladder cancer UM-UC-3 to stop in the G0/G1 phase, thus inhibiting its proliferation
GPx4↓, APS was found to reduce GPX4 expression, inhibit the activity of the light chain subunit SLC7A11 (xCT), and promote the formation of BECN1-xCT complex by activating AMPK/BECN1 signaling.
xCT↓,
AMPK↑,
Beclin-1↑,
NF-kB↓, APS could control the proliferation of lung cancer cells (A549 and NCI-H358 cells) by inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway (97)
EMT↓, APS treatment led to reduced EMT markers (vimentin, AXL) and MIF levels in cells.
Vim↓,
TumMeta↓, APS inhibits Lewis lung cancer growth and metastasis in mice by significantly reducing VEGF and EGFR expression in cancerous tissues
VEGF↓,
EGFR↓,
eff↑, Nano-drug delivery systems can increase efficiency and reduce toxicity
eff↑, Jiao et al. developed selenium nanoparticles modified with macromolecular weight APS and observed positive results in hepatoma treatment
MMP↓, Subsequent investigations revealed that APS can decrease the ΔΨm values and Bcl-2, p-PI3K, P-gp, and p-AKT levels while elevating Bax expression.
P-gp↓,
MMP9↓, downregulation of MMP-9 expression,
ChemoSen↑, Li et al. observed that APS could enhance the sensitivity of SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells to CDDP treatment by activating the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway and JNK1/2 signaling pathway
SIRT1↓, APS significantly suppressed SIRT1 and SREBP1 expression, decreased cholesterol and triglyceride levels in PC3 and DU145, and attenuated cell proliferation.
SREBP1↓,
TumAuto↑, APS can induce autophagy in colorectal cancer cells by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis and the development of cancer cells.
PI3K↓,
mTOR↓,
Casp3↑, Shen found that APS elevated caspase-9, caspase-3, and Bax protein levels, decreased Bcl-2 protein expression, and inhibited CD133 and CD44 co-positive colon cancer stem cell proliferation time
Casp9↑,
CD133↓,
CD44↓,
CSCs↓,
QoL↑, QOL was significantly improved as indicated by the reduction in pain and improvement in appetite
AntiCan↑, Preclinical studies indicate that APS exerts significant anti-liver cancer effects through multiple biological actions, including the promotion of apoptosis, inhibition of proliferation, suppression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition, regulation of
Apoptosis↑,
TumCP↓,
EMT↓,
Imm↑, improving host immune response
ChemoSen↑, APS exhibits synergistic effects when combined with conventional chemotherapeutics and interventional treatments such as transarterial chemoembolisation, improving efficacy and reducing toxicity.
BioAv↓, limitations such as low bioavailability and a lack of large-scale clinical trials remain challenges for clinical translation.
TumCG↓, APS significantly inhibited tumour growth in H22-bearing mice with a dose-dependent effect (100, 200, 400 mg/kg), with the 400 mg/kg group achieving a tumour inhibition rate of 59.01%
IL2↑, APS enhance the thymus and spleen indices and elevates the key cytokines, including IL-2, IL-12, and TNF-α.
IL12↑,
TNF-α↑,
P-gp↓, APS reversed chemoresistance by downregulating P-glycoprotein and MDR1 mRNA expression
MDR1↓,
QoL↑, These effects contributed to improved treatment tolerance and enhanced quality of life [39].
Casp↑, APS can activate both the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways, leading to caspase activation and DNA fragmentation
DNAdam↑,
Bcl-2↓, Mechanistically, APS downregulate antiapoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 while upregulating proapoptotic proteins such as Bax and cleaved caspase-3.
BAX↑,
MMP↓, APS have been shown to disrupt the mitochondrial membrane potential and promote the release of cytochrome c, thereby enhancing apoptotic cascades in hepatocellular carcinoma models.
Cyt‑c↑,
NOTCH1↓, APS (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/mL) were shown to reduce both mRNA and protein levels of Notch1 in a concentration-dependent manner.
GSK‐3β↓, APS significantly inhibited the proliferation of HepG2 cells by downregulating the expression of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), with 200 μg/mL being the most effective concentration.
TumCCA↑, APS exerted these effects by inducing cell cycle arrest at the G2/M and S phases, thereby impeding tumour cell proliferation [35].
GSH↓, HepG2 cells. APS also reduced intracellular glutathione (GSH) levels, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation levels, and elevated intracellular iron ion concentrations—all in a dose-dependent manner.
ROS↑,
lipid-P↑,
c-Iron↑,
GPx4↓, APS treatment led to the downregulation of GPX4 and upregulation of ACSL4, indicating that APS promotes ferroptosis in liver cancer cells.
ACSL4↑,
Ferroptosis↑,
Wnt↓, inhibit the expression of key proteins involved in the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway
β-catenin/ZEB1↓,
cycD1/CCND1↓, by downregulating the key oncogenic targets, including β-catenin, C-myc, and cyclin D1, which subsequently reduces Bcl-2 expression and activates the apoptotic cascade in HepG2 liver cancer cells.
Akt↓, It also inhibited the Akt/p-Akt signalling pathway.
PI3K↓, APS inhibit the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway, which is a central negative regulator of autophagy.
mTOR↓,
CXCR4↓, PS upregulated the epithelial marker E-cadherin while downregulating the mesenchymal marker vimentin and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 at both mRNA and protein levels, suggesting that APS suppress liver cancer cell growth and metastasis by inhibiting
Vim↓,
PD-L1↓, APS interfere with immune checkpoint signalling by downregulating Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumour cells.
eff↑, The preparation of polysaccharide–SeNP composites typically involves using sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) as the precursor and ascorbic acid (Vc) as the reducing agent, with synthesis carried out via a chemical reduction method in a polysaccharide solutio
eff↑, Mechanistic investigations revealed that AASP–SeNPs elevated intracellular ROS levels and reduced the mitochondrial membrane potential (∆Ψm).
ChemoSen↑, APS enhance doxorubicin-induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress by reducing O-GlcNAcylation levels, thereby promoting apoptosis of liver cancer cells.
ChemoSen↑, APS inhibited BEL-7404 human liver cancer cell growth in a concentration-dependent manner and showed stronger cytotoxicity when combined with cisplatin.
chemoP↑, APS protects against chemotherapy-induced liver injury, particularly that caused by CTX, through antiapoptotic mechanisms
*ROS↑, AgNP exposure significantly and dose-dependently decreased the cell viability, induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and led to early apoptosis in HUVECs.
*Apoptosis↑,
*NRF2↝, AgNPs could disrupt the inactivation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-mediated antioxidant response, which is considered another important element for oxidative stress caused by AgNPs in HUVECs.
| - |
in-vitro, |
GBM, |
U251 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
GBM, |
U87MG |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
GBM, |
GL26 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Cerv, |
HeLa |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
CRC, |
RKO |
|
|
|
AntiCan↑, Among the various NPs, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have garnered attention due to their cytotoxic and genotoxic properties in cancer cells.
eff↑, Our results demonstrate that UiO-66-NH2@AgNPs@Cis-Pt and its combinations exhibit enhanced cytotoxicity compared to individual components such as AgNPs and Cis-Pt.
EPR↑, Their nanometric structure allows them to easily penetrate and accumulate in tumour tissues either actively, via targeting systems [6,7,8], or passively, by taking advantage of tumour angiogenesis and the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effe
selectivity↑,
ROS↑, Once inside, AgNPs induce an increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cause mitochondrial dysfunctions, caspases activation, apoptosis, autophagy, and DNA damage
Casp↑,
Apoptosis↑,
DNAdam↑,
tumCV↓, figure 8
eff↑, One of the primary characteristics of AgNPs is their ability to release Ag+ ions from their surface in response to low pH or oxidation.
Apoptosis↑, The involvement of mitochondrial pathway of cell death in the Ag-CS NCs induced apoptosis was evident from the depolarization of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ(m)).
MMP↓,
Casp3↑, up-regulation of caspase 3 expression
ROS↑, increased production of intracellular ROS due to Ag-CS NCs treatment indicated that the oxidative stress could augment the induction of apoptosis in HT 29 cells
eff↑, use of significantly low concentration of Ag NPs impregnated in chitosan nanocarrier is a much superior approach in comparison to the use of free Ag NPs in cancer therapy.
OS↑, Results indicate that the AgNPs were efficient in prolongation of life span, reduction of tumor volume and body weight in tumor animals.
TumVol↓,
Weight↑,
AntiTum↑, AgNPs are potent in antitumor activity and the molecular mechanism is by the induction of apoptosis through the mitochondrial dependent and independent pathways.
Apoptosis↑,
mtDam↑,
Apoptosis↑, AgNPs induced apoptosis in HepG2 cells through the particle-specific effects on mitochondria.
tumCV↓, the numbers of A2780 (bulk cells) and ALDH+/CD133+ colonies were significantly reduced
CSCs↓,
selectivity↑, induced apoptosis in pancreatic CSCs and cancer cell lines, but had no effect on human normal pancreatic epithelial cells
Apoptosis↑,
ROS↑, figure 5, AgNPs induces apoptosis by oxidative stress
LDH↓, figure 5 (leakage outside the cell increases)
Casp3↑, AgNPs treated cells shows up-regulation of caspase-3, bax, bak, and c-myc, genes
BAX↑,
Bak↑,
cMyc↑,
MMP↓, and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential.
tumCV↑, AgNPs exhibit significant cytotoxic and apoptotic effects in lung cancer cell lines through mechanisms involving gene regulation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and mitochondrial depolarization.
ROS↑,
MMP↓,
TumCCA↑, dose-dependent reductions in cell viability, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis induction.
Apoptosis↑,
angioG↓, inhibit angiogenesis
| - |
in-vitro, |
BC, |
MDA-MB-231 |
|
|
|
ROS↑, Caf-AgNPs significantly increased ROS, malondialdehyde, COX-2, IL-1β, and TNF-α level in BC cells, which was accompanied by a decrease in glutathione levels.
MDA↑,
COX2↑,
IL1β↑,
TNF-α↑,
GSH↓,
Cyt‑c↑, increased levels of cytosolic cytochrome c, caspase-3, and Bax proteins, as well as a significant decrease in Bcl-2 expression and Bcl-2/Bax ratio
Casp3↑,
BAX↑,
Bcl-2↓,
LDH↓, Cancer cells subjected to Caf-AgNPs demonstrated elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) membrane leakage
cycD1/CCND1↓, notable downregulation of cyclin D1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) mRNA expression
CDK2↓,
TumCCA↑, several mechanisms for cellular destruction, including cell cycle arrest, oxidative stress induction, modulation of the inflammatory response, and mitochondrial apoptosis
mt-Apoptosis↑,
TumCMig↓, Our results showed that C-AgNPs significantly inhibited MCF-7 cell migration
Apoptosis↑, gene expression analysis indicated the induction of apoptosis by upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes BAX and P53 and downregulation of Bcl-2.
BAX↑,
P53↑,
Bcl-2↓,
| - |
in-vitro, |
Lung, |
A549 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
PC, |
MIA PaCa-2 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Pca, |
PC3 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Nor, |
HEK293 |
|
|
|
AntiCan↑, (AgNPs) have emerged as promising multifunctional agents in biomedical applications due to their notable antimicrobial and anticancer properties.
selectivity↑, demonstrated significant cytotoxic effects on cancer cells while sparing normal cells
Apoptosis↑, Apoptosis induction, cell cycle arrest, and gene expression analyses further validated their anticancer efficacy.
TumCCA↑,
Bacteria↓, Figure 6a,b show the inhibition zones of 10 µg ampicillin and 10, 50, 100, and 150 μg/mL AgNPs against bacteria on agar for two repeated tests.
tumCV↓, AgNPs at concentrations of 6.3, 6.8, 7.5, 8.3, 9.4, 10.7 and 12.5 µg/mL for 24 h. After treatment, a significant decrease in cell viability was observed in different cancer cell types,
selectivity↑, The toxic effect was weaker in healthy cells than in cancer cells
Apoptosis↑, Fig. 8a–c, a significant increase (p < 0.01; p < 0.001) in the rate of early and late apoptotic cells was observed in A549, MIA PaCa-2 and PC-3 cells.
TumCCA↑, accompanied by arrest in the S phase and, particularly, the G2/M phase.
| - |
in-vitro, |
BC, |
MCF-7 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
BC, |
T47D |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
BC, |
MDA-MB-231 |
|
|
|
TumCD↑, AgNPs showed potent cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells, no matter whether they were tamoxifen sensitive or resistant.
other↓, Next, we found that a long noncoding RNA, XLOC_006390, was decreased in AgNPs-treated breast cancer cells, coupled to inhibited cell proliferation, altered cell cycle and apoptotic phenotype.
P53↑, According to the literature, AgNPs may induce cancer cells apoptosis by activating p53, so as to achieve the antitumor effect
TumCCA↑, We found that AgNPs treatment at 150 μg/ml could induce G0/G1 cell cycle arrest
Apoptosis↑, and promote both early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis rate
ChemoSen↑, AgNPs-based approaches provided a potential way to fight drug resistance and reduce the toxicity related to chemotherapy drugs
tumCV↓, One of the highlights of this study is that AgNPs have strong cytotoxicities on all the breast cancer cell lines and clinically isolated breast cancer cells, with the IC50s at about 150 μg/ml for all
γH2AX↑, early apoptosis markers (γH2AX), was also significantly upregulated by AgNPs treatment
SOX4↓, AgNPs can inhibit the SOX4 expression by regulating XLOC_006390/miR-338-3p axis.
Apoptosis↑, According to our findings AgNPs are able to kill osteosarcoma cells independently from their actual p53 status and induce p53-independent cancer cell apoptosis.
other↑, AgNPs kill cells through a Trojan-horse type mechanism, suggesting that the intracellularly accumulated nanoparticles release toxic silver ions
ROS↑, Those ions induce the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
eff↑, t has been reported that 5 nm AgNPs were more toxic compared to 20 nm and 50 nm particles in four different cell lines
P53↝, Nearly 50% of all human cancers have been characterised by impaired p53 function which attenuates therapeutic efficacy. The level of p53 protein increased markedly upon 20 μM of 5 nm and 85 μM of 35 nm sized AgNP treatments
Apoptosis↑, Induction of apoptosis was verified by immunostaining U2Os and Saos-2 cells with cleaved caspase 3 specific antibody after treatments with 20 μM of 5 nm and with 85 μM of 35 nm sized AgNPs for 24 h
cl‑Casp3↑,
survivin↓, as decreased survivin and elevated caspase 3 mRNA levels were measured
MMP↓, Decreased mitochondrial membrane potential was detected in 5 nm and 35 nm AgNPs treated U2Os (a) and Saos-2
Cyt‑c↑, Elevated levels of cytoplasmic cytochrome c was detected in 5 nm and 35 nm AgNP-treated U2Os and Saos-2 cells
toxicity↝, The effect of Ag ions was also investigated and compared with that of AgNPs, as it is anticipated that Ag ions will be released from AgNPs, which may be responsible for their toxicity.
tumCV↓, Cell viability tests indicated high sensitivity of Jurkat T cells when exposed to AgNPs compared to Ag ions
ROS↑, AgNPs and Ag ions induce similar levels of cellular reactive oxygen species during the initial exposure period and; after 24 h, they were increased on exposure to AgNPs compared to Ag ions, which suggest that oxidative stress may be an indirect caus
p38↑, AgNPs exposure activates p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase through nuclear factor-E2-related factor-2 and nuclear factor-kappaB signaling pathways, subsequently inducing DNA damage, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.
NRF2↓,
NF-kB↝,
DNAdam↑,
Apoptosis↑,
ROS↑, This review focus on the abilities of nanoparticles to induce oxidative stress, prevent proliferation, and trigger apoptosis in cancer cells.
TumCP↓,
Apoptosis↑,
| - |
in-vitro, |
Pca, |
PC3 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Pca, |
LNCaP |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Pca, |
DU145 |
|
|
|
selectivity↑, Both AgNPs and G-AgNPs were cytotoxic only to CRPC cells and not to hormone-sensitive ones and their effect was higher after functionalization showing the potential of glucose to favor AgNPs’ uptake by cancer cells.
ROS↑, NPs increased the ROS, inducing mitochondrial damage, and arresting cell cycle in S Phase, therefore blocking proliferation, and inducing apoptosis.
mtDam↑,
TumCCA↑,
TumCP↓,
Apoptosis↑,
MMP↓, AgNPs were able to depolarize the cells’ mitochondria to 32.74% and 10.36%, respectively
| - |
in-vitro, |
Kidney, |
786-O |
|
|
|
ROS↑, AgNPs are cytotoxic to 786-O cells, a ccRCC cell line, entering through endocytosis, increasing ROS, depolarizing mitochondrial membrane, and blocking the cell cycle, leading to a reduction of proliferation capacity and apoptosis.
MMP↑,
TumCCA↑,
TumCP↓,
Apoptosis↑,
RadioS↑, 786-O is intrinsically resistant to radiation, but after AgNPs’ administration, radiation induces cytotoxicity through mitochondrial membrane depolarization and S phase blockage.
EPR↑, cellular uptake of the AgNPs results indicated that the AgNPs accumulated within the cell.
BAX↑, Bax, Bcl-2, caspase-3 (CASP3), caspase-9 (CASP9)
Bcl-2↑,
Casp3↑,
Casp9↑,
DNAdam↑, apoptotic effects of the AgNPs through DNA fragmentation test, flow cytometry and cell cycle analysis indicated the induction of apoptosis in the A549 cell line.
TumCCA↑,
Apoptosis↑,
ROS↑, significant increase in ROS and lipid peroxidation (LPO), along with a decrease in MMP and glutathione (GSH) levels.
lipid-P↑,
MMP↓,
GSH↓,
TumCCA↑, significant increase in ROS and lipid peroxidation (LPO), along with a decrease in MMP and glutathione (GSH) levels.
Apoptosis↑,
Necroptosis↑,
TumCD↑, AgNPs-induced cell death in HeLA cells suggested the anticancer potential of ND-AgNPs.
Dose↝, ND-AgNPs at 10, 25, and 50 µg/ml concentration
eff↑, electronic microscopy experiments revealed that AgNP20 can rapidly interact with the cell membrane, penetrate neutrophils, localize in vacuole-like structures, and be randomly distributed in the cytosol after 24 h.
Apoptosis↑, AgNP20 induced apoptosis
eff↑, AgNPs were demonstrated to be able to enter K562 cells (a CML cell line) in a dose-dependent manner and locate in endosomes
ROS↑, Reactive oxygen species (ROS) could be generated upon AgNPs exposure and cause cytotoxicity and apoptosis.
Apoptosis↑,
eff↓, alterations caused by AgNPs exposure could be reversed by the addition of Vitamin C (an antioxidant).
ROS↑, The gAgNPs induced more ROS in the HuH-7 cells than in the CHANG cells.
selectivity↑, HuH-7 cells showed an increased sensitivity to gAgNPs than the CHANG cells.
DNAdam↑, higher concentrations of gAgNPs may induce significant cytotoxicity and cause DNA damage and apoptosis.
Apoptosis↑,
GSH↓, The level of glutathione was decreased (Figure 4B) and lipid peroxide was increased in HuH-7 cells than CHANG cells (Figure 4A).
lipid-P↑,
MMP↓, indicating loss of MMP
DNAdam↑, higher DNA damage was seen in HuH-7 cells than CHANG cells
tumCV↓, decreased cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner and the IC50 of 75 μg/mL for Ag NPs
ROS↑, Ag NPs cytotoxicity was associated with induction of ROS and cell apoptosis in HepG2 cell line
Apoptosis↑,
| - |
in-vitro, |
Lung, |
A549 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vivo, |
Lung, |
A549 |
|
|
|
Apoptosis↑, Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have shown great potential as therapeutic agents due to their ability to cause apoptotic cell death in cancer cells.
VEGF↓, suppressing the VEGF signaling pathway, repressing p53-mediated pathways, promoting cell cycle arrest,
P53↓,
TumCCA↑,
ROS↑, we found that AgNPs induced ROS generation
AntiTum↑, AgNPs exhibit similar antitumoral effects on both A549 and A549/DDP-bearing mice.
eff↑, AgNPs are internalized by cells far more effectively than free Ag+ under identical exposure conditions
ATP↓, AgNPs exposure also decreased basal respiration (52.3 ± 4.6 pmol/min/106 cells), maximal respiration (109.2 ± 12.2 pmol/min/106 cells), ATP production (
eff↑, These results explain why AgNPs remain effective against cisplatin-resistant A549 cells.
CTR1↑, recent studies have shown that AgNPs treatment significantly upregulates CTR1
AntiCan↑, iologically synthesized silver nanoparticles induced apoptosis, and showed a cytotoxic and anti-cancer effect against gastric cancer cell lines in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
Apoptosis↑,
eff↑, Biologically synthesized nanoparticles may possess higher anti-cancer properties than commercial silver
ROS↑, graphical abstract
DNAdam↑, inducing cell death through apoptotic signaling pathways, and inducing excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) in tumor cells, which leads to oxidative damage and increased production of proapoptotic enzymes
TumCCA↑,
eff↑, Metallic nanoparticles, especially those derived from metals, improve the effectiveness of anticancer agents by facilitating targeted delivery and sustained release at tumor sites.
Apoptosis↑,
eff↓, Au NPs are notable for their biocompatibility and are utilized in photothermal therapy to convert light into heat, effectively destroying cancer cells
ChemoSen↑, Magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO NPs) induce apoptosis through ROS production and enhance the impact of chemotherapy drugs, synthesized with plant extracts as reducing agents.
| - |
in-vitro, |
BC, |
MCF-7 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Ovarian, |
SKOV3 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
GBM, |
U87MG |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Melanoma, |
A431 |
|
|
|
RadioS↑, Here, we, for the first time, present the results of the radiosensitizing properties of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) (possessing low toxicity towards human body) against cancer cells under neutron irradiation.
ROS↑, The mechanism of AgNPs anticancer (intrinsic) effect includes oxidative stress, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, activate endoplasmic reticulum stress, modulate various signaling pathways, etc
TumCCA↑,
Apoptosis↑,
ER Stress↑,
| - |
in-vitro, |
CRC, |
HCT116 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Nor, |
HEK293 |
|
|
|
NRF2↑, Nanosilver increased Nrf2 protein expression and disrupted the cell cycle at the G1 and G2/M phases.
TumCCA↑, AgNPs interact with DNA to stop
the cell cycle and lead to apoptosis
ROS↑, Nanosilver induced significant mitochondrial oxidative stress in HCT116, whereas it did not in the non-cancer HIEC-6 and nanosilver/sodium ascorbate co-treatment was preferentially lethal to HCT116 cells,
selectivity↑,
*AntiViral↑, AgNPs are effective antiviral agents against various viruses such as human
immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and monkey pox virus through interaction with
surface glycoproteins on the virus
*toxicity↝, Citrate and PVP-coated AgNPs have been found to be less toxic than non-coated AgNPs
ETC↓, AgNPs affects mitochondrial function through the disruption of the electron transport
chain2,24,26,33,39–41
MMP↓, Studies have shown that exposure to AgNPs resulted in a decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in various in vitro and in vivo experiments
DNAdam↑, AgNPs has also been shown to interact with and induce damage to DNA, DNA strand breaks, DNA damage
Apoptosis↑, apoptosis induced by AgNPs were through membrane lipid peroxidation, ROS, and oxidative stress
lipid-P↑,
other↝, Several studies have showed AgNPs interact with various proteins such as haemoglobin, serum albumin, metallothioneins, copper transporters, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), and bacterial proteins.
UPR↑, Studies have shown exposure to AgNPs induces activation of the UPR
*GRP78/BiP↑, AgNPs induced increased levels of GRP78, phosphorylated PERK, phosphorylated eIF2-α, and
phosphorylated IRE1α, spliced XBP1, cleaved ATF-6, CHOP, JNK and caspase 12
*p‑PERK↑,
*cl‑eIF2α↑,
*CHOP↑,
*JNK↑,
Hif1a↓, One study showed AgNPs inhibits HIF-1 accumulation and suppresses expression of HIF-1 target genes in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and also found the protein
levels of HIF-1α and HIF-1β decreased
AntiCan↑, Many studies have shown that ascorbic acid, on its own, has anti-cancer effects
*toxicity↓, However, when the rats were treated with both ascorbic acid
and AgNPs, a decrease in toxic effects was observed in non-cancer parotid glands in rats
eff↑, Studies have shown both AgNPs and ascorbic acid have greater effects and toxicity in
cancer cells relative to non-cancer cells
| - |
in-vitro, |
BC, |
SkBr3 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
CRC, |
HT-29 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
CRC, |
HCT116 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Colon, |
Caco-2 |
|
|
|
MMP2↓, AgNPs-EPSaer induced a significant decrease of cell motility and MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity and a significant increase of ROS generation
MMP9↓,
ROS↑, remarkable ROS increase in a concentration-dependent manner. Compared to the control cells, a maximum of 2.25 and 1.75 fold increases in ROS generation was observed with 10 µg/ml concentration of AgNPs-EPSaer treatment
TumAuto↑, supported cell death mainly through autophagy and in a minor extend through apoptosis.
Apoptosis↑,
ER Stress↑, highlighted important pathways involved in AgNPs-EPSaer toxicity, including endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment triggering cell death trough apoptosis and/or autophagy activation.
| - |
in-vitro, |
Lung, |
A549 |
|
|
|
- |
in-vitro, |
Liver, |
HepG2 |
|
|
|
*Bacteria↓, silver nanoparticles synthesized from Dendropanax morbifera Léveille leaves (D-AgNPs) exhibit antimicrobial activity and reduce the viability of cancer cells without affecting the viability of RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells
tumCV↓,
selectivity↑,
ROS↑, enhanced the production of ROS in both cell lines.
Apoptosis↑, An increase in cell apoptosis and a reduction in cell migration in A549 cells were also observed after D-AgNP treatment.
TumCMig↓,
AntiCan↑, potential of D-AgNPs as a possible anticancer agent, particularly for the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Showing Research Papers: 1 to 50 of 1104
Page 1 of 23
Next
* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1104
Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:
Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ
antiOx↓, 1, Catalase↑, 1, Ferroptosis↓, 1, Ferroptosis↑, 1, GPx4↓, 2, GSH↓, 8, HO-1↑, 1, c-Iron↑, 1, lipid-P↑, 4, MDA↑, 2, NRF2↓, 1, NRF2↑, 1, OXPHOS↓, 1, OXPHOS↑, 1, ROS↑, 31, mt-ROS↑, 1, SOD2↑, 1, TrxR↓, 6, xCT↓, 1, xCT↑, 1,
Mitochondria & Bioenergetics ⓘ
AIF↓, 1, AIF↑, 2, ATP↓, 4, ETC↓, 1, MMP↓, 13, MMP↑, 1, MPT↑, 1, mtDam↑, 3, OCR↑, 1, mt-OCR↓, 1,
Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ
ACSL4↑, 1, AMPK↑, 2, cMyc↑, 1, Glycolysis↓, 5, HK2↓, 6, LDH↓, 3, LDHA↓, 1, NADPH↓, 1, PDH↓, 1, PDH↑, 1, PIK3CA↓, 1, PPP↓, 1, SIRT1↓, 1, SREBP1↓, 1, Warburg↓, 1,
Cell Death ⓘ
Akt↓, 5, Apoptosis↑, 50, mt-Apoptosis↑, 1, ATF2↓, 1, Bak↑, 1, BAX↑, 8, Bax:Bcl2↑, 2, Bcl-2↓, 7, Bcl-2↑, 1, Bcl-xL↓, 1, Casp↑, 2, Casp3↑, 10, cl‑Casp3↑, 1, Casp7↑, 1, Casp9↑, 3, Cyt‑c↑, 4, Fas↑, 1, Ferroptosis↓, 1, Ferroptosis↑, 1, JNK↓, 1, Necroptosis↑, 1, necrosis↑, 1, p27↑, 1, p38↑, 1, survivin↓, 2, TumCD↑, 2,
Kinase & Signal Transduction ⓘ
AMPKα↑, 2,
Transcription & Epigenetics ⓘ
other↓, 1, other↑, 1, other↝, 5, tumCV↓, 7, tumCV↑, 1,
Protein Folding & ER Stress ⓘ
ER Stress↑, 3, UPR↑, 1,
Autophagy & Lysosomes ⓘ
Beclin-1↑, 1, p‑Beclin-1↑, 1, TumAuto↑, 5,
DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ
DNAdam↑, 11, P53↓, 1, P53↑, 3, P53↝, 1, cl‑PARP↑, 2, γH2AX↑, 1,
Cell Cycle & Senescence ⓘ
CDK2↓, 1, cycD1/CCND1↓, 3, P21↑, 2, TumCCA↑, 17,
Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ
CD133↓, 1, CD44↓, 1, CSCs↓, 3, EMT↓, 2, FOXO3↑, 1, GSK‐3β↓, 1, mTOR↓, 5, NOTCH1↓, 2, NOTCH3↓, 1, PI3K↓, 4, PTEN↑, 1, TumCG↓, 7, Wnt↓, 2,
Migration ⓘ
Ca+2↑, 1, miR-133a-3p↑, 1, MMP2↓, 1, MMP9↓, 2, SOX4↓, 1, TumCI↓, 2, TumCMig↓, 2, TumCP↓, 8, TumMeta↓, 1, Vim↓, 2, β-catenin/ZEB1↓, 2,
Angiogenesis & Vasculature ⓘ
angioG↓, 3, EGFR↓, 1, EPR↑, 2, Hif1a↓, 3, VEGF↓, 3,
Barriers & Transport ⓘ
CTR1↑, 1, P-gp↓, 2,
Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ
COX2↑, 1, CXCR4↓, 1, IL12↑, 1, IL1β↑, 1, IL2↑, 1, IL6↓, 2, Imm↑, 3, NF-kB↓, 4, NF-kB↝, 1, NK cell↑, 2, p50↓, 1, PD-L1↓, 1, TNF-α↑, 2,
Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ
BioAv↓, 1, ChemoSen↑, 10, Dose↑, 1, Dose↝, 5, eff↓, 9, eff↑, 25, eff↝, 2, Half-Life↓, 1, MDR1↓, 1, RadioS↑, 4, selectivity↑, 8,
Clinical Biomarkers ⓘ
EGFR↓, 1, IL6↓, 2, LDH↓, 3, PD-L1↓, 1,
Functional Outcomes ⓘ
AntiCan↑, 9, AntiTum↑, 6, chemoP↑, 1, OS↑, 1, QoL↑, 2, Symptoms↓, 1, toxicity↓, 2, toxicity↑, 2, toxicity↝, 1, TumVol↓, 2, TumW↓, 1, Weight↑, 1,
Infection & Microbiome ⓘ
Bacteria↓, 2,
Total Targets: 164
Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:
Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ
NRF2↝, 1, ROS↑, 1,
Cell Death ⓘ
Apoptosis↑, 1, JNK↑, 1,
Protein Folding & ER Stress ⓘ
CHOP↑, 1, cl‑eIF2α↑, 1, GRP78/BiP↑, 1, p‑PERK↑, 1,
Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ
IFN-γ↑, 1, IL2↑, 1, TNF-α↑, 1,
Functional Outcomes ⓘ
toxicity↓, 1, toxicity↝, 1,
Infection & Microbiome ⓘ
AntiViral↑, 1, Bacteria↓, 1,
Total Targets: 15
Scientific Paper Hit Count for: Apoptosis, Apoptosis
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include :
-low or high Dose
-format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
-different cell line effects
-synergies with other products
-if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:% IllCat:% CanType:% Cells:% prod#:% Target#:14 State#:% Dir#:2
wNotes=on sortOrder:rid,rpid
Home Page