Ferulic acid / FIS1 Cancer Research Results

FA, Ferulic acid: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Ferulic acid is an antioxidant found in some skin creams and serums.
Foods: popcorn, bamboo, whole-grain rye bread, whole-grain oat flakes, sweet corn (cooked)
Ferulic acid (FA) is a hydroxycinnamic acid abundant in plant cell walls (notably cereals/whole grains) with strong antioxidant and cytoprotective activity. Mechanistically, FA is frequently described as inducing Nrf2/HO-1 antioxidant programs and suppressing NF-κB-linked inflammation, with additional model-dependent anticancer effects (cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, reduced invasion). Oral exposure is variable because FA is rapidly metabolized (often as conjugates) and bioaccessibility depends on the food matrix.

-Ferulic acid found in dietary strand fractions, especially its free form, has important functions for protecting the human health.
-AChE inhibitor (AD)
-Cooking results in an increase in free ferulic acid quantity and in a reduction in bound ferulic acid quantity.
Bamboo shoots       243.6 mg/100g
Sugar-beet pulp     800 mg/100g
Popcorn             313 mg/100g
Wheat bran	    500–1500mg/100g
Whole wheat flour   100–300mg/100g
            
Type of corn p-coumaric acidferulic acid
   mg/kg, DW mg/kg, DW
Yellow dent 18.9 265
American blue N.D. 927
Mexican blue 1.3 202
white 6.6 2484
Pathway / Target	Modulation by FA / Direction
Aβ aggregation	         ↓ Inhibits fibril formation and destabilizes existing Aβ fibrils 
BACE‑1 & APP	         ↓ Reduces BACE-1 and APP expression; ↑ MMP‑2/‑9 expression promoting Aβ clearance
Tau hyperphosphorylation  Implicitly ↓ through modulation of Ca²⁺/CDK5/GSK3β pathways
Ca²⁺         	         ↓ FA lowers STEP levels via chelation of Ca²⁺, suppressing PP2B → restores synaptic plasticity
(AChE / BChE)	         ↓ Inhibition of AChE (FA IC₅₀~15 µM, derivatives IC₅₀ down to 0.006 µM); also BChE
(MAO‑A/B)	         ↓ Inhibits MAO‑B (derivatives IC₅₀ ~0.3–0.7 µM), reducing ROS
ROS                      ↓ Scavenges ROS, enhances antioxidant enzymes (e.g., catalase), ↓ MDA
(COX‑2, 5‑LOX, NLRP3)	 ↓ Derivatives inhibit COX‑2/5‑LOX; derivative 13a ↓ NLRP3 inflammasome
Iron/Cu²⁺ chelation	 ↓ Metal-induced Aβ aggregation via chelation by FA and derivatives
Autophagy & Aβ clearance  ↗ Suggested promotion of autophagy mechanisms targeting Aβ

Ferulic acid — Ferulic acid is a naturally occurring hydroxycinnamic phenolic acid concentrated in plant cell walls, particularly in cereal bran, whole grains, rice bran, corn, oats, wheat, bamboo shoots, and some fruits and vegetables. It is formally classified as a dietary polyphenol and phenolic antioxidant; the standard abbreviation is FA. Most food-derived FA is ester-linked to arabinoxylans, lignin, and other structural polysaccharides, whereas free FA is more readily absorbed. FA has predominantly antioxidant and cytoprotective activity in normal tissues, but can produce antiproliferative, pro-oxidant, mitochondrial, apoptotic, pyroptotic, and anti-invasive effects in susceptible cancer models. It is not an approved anticancer drug.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Induction of cancer-cell growth arrest and mitochondrial cell death through suppression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR, STAT3, cyclins, and CDKs, with activation of p53, p21, BAX, caspases, and related stress pathways.
  2. Context-dependent redox disruption in cancer cells, including ROS accumulation, glutathione and antioxidant-enzyme depletion, mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation, and ROS/JNK/BAX-dependent apoptosis or pyroptosis.
  3. Suppression of EMT, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis through modulation of MMP2, MMP9, VEGF, β-catenin/ZEB1, vimentin, E-cadherin, NF-κB, and related pathways.
  4. Inhibition of glycolytic and anabolic signalling, including reductions in c-MYC, PKM2, LDH, CAIX, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and tumor-associated glycolysis in selected models.
  5. Modulation of DNA-damage responses and cell-cycle checkpoints, including ATM, ATR, CHK1/2, γH2AX, p53, p21, CDC25, CDK2, CDK4/6, and cyclin D1.
  6. Suppression of tumor-promoting inflammatory signalling, particularly NF-κB, COX-2, JAK2/STAT3, inflammatory cytokines, and related mediators.
  7. NRF2/HO-1 and direct radical-scavenging activity are central to normal-cell protection but are secondary and context-dependent in cancer, where antioxidant signalling could theoretically protect some tumors from oxidative therapies.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Orally administered FA is absorbed from the stomach and small intestine, with additional release and microbial conversion of cereal-bound FA in the colon. It undergoes rapid first-pass glucuronidation, sulfation, methylation, and glycine conjugation; circulating material is predominantly conjugated rather than free FA. Food-matrix binding is a major constraint: free FA and processed or enzymatically released FA are more bioavailable than intact bran-bound FA. Human cereal studies have reported free or equivalent plasma concentrations in the low-nanomolar range, while pharmacokinetic results from herbal mixtures cannot be directly extrapolated to purified FA. Nanoencapsulation, phospholipid carriers, ester derivatives, and enzymatic liberation from bran can increase exposure experimentally, but none is established for oncology.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Most anticancer experiments use approximately 25–500 µM FA, with many cytotoxic effects occurring at 100 µM or higher. These concentrations substantially exceed the low-nanomolar free FA levels typically observed after ordinary dietary intake and likely exceed sustained free systemic exposure achievable with conventional oral preparations. Therefore, direct systemic tumor cytotoxicity from dietary FA is pharmacokinetically implausible. Local gastrointestinal exposure, metabolites, repeated dosing, formulated delivery, or pharmacological derivatives may be more relevant than plasma free-FA concentrations.

Clinical evidence status: Cancer evidence is preclinical, consisting mainly of cultured cancer cells and rodent xenograft or carcinogenesis models. There are no established oncology RCTs showing tumor response, progression-free survival, or overall-survival benefit from purified FA. Radiosensitization and chemosensitization have been reported experimentally, but FA also protects normal tissues from radiation and chemotherapy injury; the net interaction is treatment-, timing-, dose-, and tissue-dependent. Human evidence is limited mainly to dietary bioavailability, topical dermatology, cardiovascular or metabolic observations, and combination supplements studied in cognitive impairment. FA should not be classified as a clinically validated anticancer therapy.

Ferulic Acid Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 PI3K AKT mTOR survival signalling PI3K ↓; AKT ↓; mTOR ↓; PTEN ↑ (model-dependent) AKT ↔ or ↑ during injury protection R, G Growth inhibition and apoptosis sensitization A recurrent anticancer axis, although direction in normal stressed tissue may differ from that in malignant cells.
2 Mitochondrial apoptosis Mitochondrial membrane potential ↓; BAX ↑; BCL-2 ↓; cytochrome c release ↑; caspase-9 ↑; caspase-3 ↑; apoptosis ↑ Mitochondrial injury ↓; apoptosis ↓ under toxic or inflammatory stress R, G Intrinsic cell-death execution Common downstream phenotype in susceptible cancer models; frequently concentration- and cell-line-dependent.
3 Cancer-cell ROS and pyroptotic stress ROS ↑; JNK ↑; BAX ↑; GSDMD processing ↑; apoptosis or pyroptosis ↑ (model-dependent) ROS ↓; lipid peroxidation ↓; oxidative injury ↓ P, R, G Selective redox overload FA is not uniformly antioxidant in cancer. A ROS/JNK/BAX/GSDMD mechanism has been reported in lung-cancer models, but is not established across tumor types.
4 Cell-cycle checkpoint control p53 ↑; p21 ↑; CHK1/2 ↑; CDC25 ↓; CDK2 ↓; CDK4/6 ↓; cyclin D1 ↓; arrest ↑ G Cytostasis The specific arrest phase varies among models and may include G0/G1, S-phase, or G2/M accumulation.
5 EMT invasion and metastasis EMT ↓; MMP2 ↓; MMP9 ↓; vimentin ↓; β-catenin/ZEB1 ↓; migration ↓; invasion ↓ G Anti-invasive and antimetastatic phenotype Supported principally by cell migration assays and animal tumor models rather than clinical evidence.
6 NF-κB inflammatory signalling NF-κB ↓; COX-2 ↓; inflammatory cytokines ↓; survival signalling ↓ NF-κB ↓; COX-2 ↓; iNOS ↓; TNF-α ↓; IL-1β ↓; IL-6 ↓ R, G Reduced inflammation and tumor-promoting signalling This mechanism is more consistently protective and anti-inflammatory than directly cytotoxic.
7 Glycolysis and anabolic metabolism c-MYC ↓; PKM2 ↓; LDH ↓; CAIX ↓; glycolysis ↓ (model-dependent) G Metabolic growth restriction Potentially important in highly glycolytic tumors but supported by fewer models than apoptosis and cell-cycle regulation.
8 STAT and growth-factor signalling JAK2 ↓; phosphorylated STAT3 ↓; STAT6 ↓; FGFR1 ↓; FGFR2 ↓; proliferation ↓ R, G Suppression of proliferative transcription Individual targets are tumor-model-specific and should not be treated as universal direct molecular targets of FA.
9 Angiogenesis VEGF ↓; angiogenesis ↓ VEGF ↔ or ↑ during tissue repair (context-dependent) G Reduced tumor vascular support Potentially opposite modulation in ischemic or reparative normal tissue illustrates the context dependence of FA.
10 DNA damage response ATM ↑; ATR ↑; CHK1/2 ↑; γH2AX ↑; DNA damage ↑ (high concentration only) DNA oxidative damage ↓ R, G Checkpoint activation and tumor-cell death At pharmacological concentrations, FA may promote cancer-cell stress while protecting normal DNA through antioxidant activity.
11 NRF2 HO-1 antioxidant response NRF2 ↔ or ↑ (context-dependent); possible tumor stress adaptation NRF2 ↑; ARE ↑; HO-1 ↑; NQO1 ↑; GCLC ↑; GCLM ↑; GSH ↑ R, G Endogenous antioxidant defence A core cytoprotective mechanism in normal tissues but not necessarily therapeutically favourable in NRF2-dependent tumors.
12 Mitochondrial dynamics and tissue protection Not consistently defined DRP1 ↓; FIS1 ↓; MFN1 ↑; MFN2 ↑; OPA1 ↑; mitochondrial damage ↓ R, G Preservation of mitochondrial integrity Reported mainly in toxic, metabolic, cardiovascular, or neurological injury models.
13 Radiosensitization and radioprotection Radiosensitization ↑ in selected models; DNA damage and apoptosis ↑ (model-dependent) Radiation-induced ROS ↓; inflammation ↓; tissue injury ↓; radioprotection ↑ R, G Bidirectional radiation interaction Timing and tissue selectivity are critical. Normal-tissue radioprotection does not establish improved tumor control and could theoretically reduce efficacy under some conditions.
14 Chemosensitization and treatment toxicity Chemosensitivity ↑ in selected drug and cell-line combinations Chemotherapy-associated oxidative or inflammatory injury ↓ R, G Adjunct modulation No standardized human oncology dosing or validated treatment combination has been established.
15 Clinical Translation Constraint Free systemic FA exposure is far below many cytotoxic in-vitro concentrations Rapid conjugation; matrix-dependent absorption; generally dietary exposure Limited systemic anticancer translation Most experiments use tens to hundreds of micromolar FA, whereas human dietary exposure produces predominantly conjugated metabolites and low free plasma concentrations.

P: 0–30 min    R: 30 min–3 hr    G: >3 hr



Alzheimer’s disease relevance: Ferulic acid has substantial preclinical relevance to Alzheimer’s disease through direct inhibition of amyloid-β aggregation, attenuation of APP and BACE1 processing, reduction of tau phosphorylation, suppression of neuroinflammation and oxidative injury, metal chelation, preservation of mitochondrial function, and modulation of cholinergic signalling. FA and several FA-derived multifunctional compounds inhibit AChE or BChE in vitro, but the potency of derivatives should not be attributed to unmodified FA. Small human studies have evaluated combination products containing FA and Angelica archangelica extract in mild cognitive impairment or dementia-related symptoms; these do not establish efficacy of isolated FA or demonstrate disease modification. The clinical evidence remains preliminary and formulation-specific.

AD clinical evidence status: Strong preclinical evidence; limited small human combination-product studies; no confirmatory phase III trial; no regulatory approval for prevention or treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Reported cognitive findings require replication using isolated FA, adequate sample sizes, biomarker-defined populations, validated dosing, and longer follow-up.

Ferulic Acid in Alzheimer’s Disease

Rank Pathway / Axis Modulation TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Amyloid beta aggregation Aβ oligomerization ↓; fibril formation ↓; existing fibril stability ↓ P, R Reduced amyloid aggregation Direct anti-aggregation effects are demonstrated mainly in biochemical and cellular systems at concentrations not clearly achieved in human brain tissue.
2 APP BACE1 amyloid production APP ↓; BACE1 ↓; amyloidogenic processing ↓ G Reduced Aβ generation Supported mainly by cellular and animal models.
3 Oxidative stress and NRF2 HO-1 ROS ↓; lipid peroxidation ↓; NRF2 ↑; HO-1 ↑; NQO1 ↑; GSH ↑; antioxidant enzymes ↑ P, R, G Neuronal redox protection One of the most consistent neuroprotective mechanisms across toxicant and neurodegeneration models.
4 Neuroinflammation NF-κB ↓; NLRP3 ↓; COX-2 ↓; iNOS ↓; TNF-α ↓; IL-1β ↓; IL-6 ↓ R, G Reduced inflammatory neuronal injury Predominantly demonstrated in animal and glial-cell models.
5 Tau kinase and phosphatase balance GSK3β activity ↓; CDK5 dysregulation ↓; tau hyperphosphorylation ↓ (model-dependent) R, G Reduced tau pathology The exact upstream mechanism varies and may involve calcium signalling, AKT, ERK, and oxidative-stress regulation.
6 Cholinergic signalling AChE ↓; BChE ↓; acetylcholine availability ↑; ChAT ↑ (model-dependent) P, R, G Improved cholinergic transmission Unmodified FA is generally less potent than optimized FA derivatives; derivative potency must be recorded separately.
7 Mitochondrial function Mitochondrial ROS ↓; membrane-potential loss ↓; ATP preservation ↑; DRP1 ↓; FIS1 ↓; MFN1 and MFN2 ↑ R, G Preserved neuronal bioenergetics Evidence derives mainly from oxidative, toxicant, and ischemic injury models.
8 Calcium dependent synaptic dysfunction Pathological Ca²⁺ signalling ↓; calcineurin PP2B signalling ↓; STEP ↓ (model-dependent) P, R Preserved synaptic plasticity The description of FA as directly chelating neuronal calcium should be used cautiously; pathway modulation is better supported than clinically meaningful systemic calcium chelation.
9 Metal associated amyloid toxicity Iron and Cu²⁺ coordination ↑; metal-driven ROS and Aβ aggregation ↓ P, R Reduced metal-mediated oxidative aggregation Most evidence is biochemical. Brain exposure sufficient for clinically meaningful chelation has not been established.
10 Autophagy and proteostasis Autophagic clearance ↔ or ↑ (model-dependent); Aβ clearance ↑ G Improved aggregate disposal Autophagy findings are inconsistent and should not be represented as a universal FA mechanism.
11 Clinical Translation Constraint Brain exposure uncertain; extensive conjugation; human evidence derived largely from combination products Unproven disease modification No validated isolated-FA dose, target-engagement biomarker, or confirmatory Alzheimer’s disease trial is available.

P: 0–30 min    R: 30 min–3 hr    G: >3 hr



FIS1, Mitochondrial fission 1 protein: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:

FIS1 — Mitochondrial fission 1 protein
FIS1 is a mitochondrial outer-membrane fission adaptor/receptor linked to DRP1-mediated mitochondrial dynamics. In cancer, FIS1 is an emerging target because mitochondrial fission supports proliferation, survival adaptation, metastatic behavior, and tumor-initiating/stem-like phenotypes in some models. Recent TNBC evidence suggests FIS1 is required for expansion of tumor-initiating cells and that FIS1 loss suppresses TIC activity without broadly collapsing mitochondrial function, making it a potentially more selective mitochondrial dynamics target than global DRP1 inhibition.

-Often pro-tumor, Supports mitochondrial fragmentation/dynamics in stress-adapted cells

FIS1 is relevant to Alzheimer’s disease as part of the pathological mitochondrial fission program. AD models and human tissue studies show an imbalance toward mitochondrial fission, involving increased DRP1 and FIS1 and reduced fusion proteins such as MFN1, MFN2, and OPA1. Aβ and phosphorylated tau are linked to abnormal DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation, and increased DRP1/FIS1 interaction has been reported in Aβ-treated neurons and AD patient-derived fibroblasts.
-Direction: Usually increased or overactive in AD-like pathology

Natural Product Reported FIS1 / Fission Effect Evidence Strength for FIS1 Cancer Relevance Database Classification Suggested Note
Curcumin Reported to decrease FIS1 and DRP1-associated mitochondrial fission in several mitochondrial injury models. Moderate to strong Indirect; FIS1-specific cancer evidence is limited. FIS1/DRP1 mitochondrial fission down-modulator Best-supported natural product to link with FIS1, but still mostly non-cancer evidence.
EGCG Reported to decrease FIS1 or regulate the DRP1/FIS1 mitochondrial dynamics axis in neuroprotection and injury models. Moderate Indirect; stronger evidence for mitochondrial quality control than cancer-specific FIS1 targeting. Possible FIS1 down-modulator Useful to tag under mitochondrial fission, mitophagy, and oxidative-stress adaptation.
Urolithin A Reported to decrease FIS1 and DRP1 while improving mitophagy and mitochondrial quality control. Moderate Indirect; mostly neurodegeneration/mitophagy evidence. FIS1/DRP1-associated mitochondrial quality-control modulator Better classified under mitophagy and mitochondrial quality control
Melatonin Often reported to reduce pathological DRP1/FIS1-mediated mitochondrial fission, but effects can be context-dependent. Moderate Indirect; cancer relevance is complex and context-dependent. Context-dependent mitochondrial dynamics modulator “normalizes mitochondrial dynamics” rather than simple FIS1 inhibition.
Resveratrol Can reduce pathological DRP1/FIS1 fission in some injury models, but may increase Fis1/Drp1 expression in aging-repair contexts. Mixed Indirect; direction may vary by model and dose. Context-dependent FIS1/DRP1 modulator not a simple FIS1 inhibitor; more a mitochondrial dynamics normalizer.
Quercetin Associated with FIS1 targeting in omics/computational studies; direct experimental FIS1 modulation is weaker. Weak to moderate Indirect; not validated as a FIS1-targeted anticancer compound. Putative FIS1-associated modulator Suitable as a low-confidence or “possible” FIS1 link.
Sulforaphane Inhibits mitochondrial fission mainly through DRP1-related mechanisms; direct FIS1 modulation is unclear. Weak for FIS1 specifically Indirect; relevant to cancer metabolism and oxidative stress, but not FIS1-specific. Broader DRP1/fission pathway modulator mitochondrial fission rather than direct FIS1 modulation.
Berberine Reported to inhibit DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fission; FIS1 is mainly implicated as part of the pathway rather than directly modulated. Weak for FIS1 specifically Indirect; potentially relevant to cancer metabolism but not validated through FIS1. Broader DRP1/fission pathway modulator not a direct FIS1 modulator unless using a broader mitochondrial fission category.


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
6416- CUR,  QC,  FA,  RES,  EGCG  Natural products targeting mitochondria: emerging therapeutics for age-associated neurological disorders
- Review, AD, NA
*DRP1/DNM1L↓, *FIS1↓, *MFN2↑, *OPA1↑, *DRP1/DNM1L↓, *FIS1↓, *OPA1↑, *MFN1↑, *MFN2↑, *DRP1/DNM1L↓, *FIS1↓, *MFN1↑, *MFN2↑, *memory↑, *mtDam↓, *DRP1/DNM1L↓, *FIS1↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Total Targets: 0

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

MFN1↑, 2,   MFN2↑, 3,   OPA1↑, 2,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics(tgid=3)

DRP1/DNM1L↓, 4,   FIS1↓, 4,   mtDam↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23)

memory↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 7

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: FIS1, Mitochondrial fission 1 protein
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:77  Target#:1486  State#:%  Dir#:%
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page