Database Query Results : Shikonin, , Warburg

SK, Shikonin: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
The (R)-enantiomer of alkannin is known as shikonin, and the racemic mixture of the two is known as shikalkin.
Shikonin is a naphthoquinone derivative primarily isolated from the roots of plants in the Boraginaceae family (e.g., Lithospermum erythrorhizon).
Shikonin is the main active component of a Chinese medicinal plant 'Zi Cao'
-Shikonin is a major component of zicao (purple gromwell, the dried root of Lithospermum erythrorhizon), a Chinese herbal medicine with anti-inflammatory properties
-Quinone methides (QMs) are highly reactive intermediates formed from natural compounds like shikonin
-ic50 cancer cells 1-10uM, normal cells >10uM

-known as Glycolysis inhibitor: ( inhibit pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2*******), a key enzyme in the glycolytic pathway)

Available from mcsformulas.com Shikonin Pro Liposomal, 30 mg
Also In Glycolysis Inhibithree(100 mg PHLORIZIN,10 mg TANSHINONE IIA, 8 mg Shikonin)

-Note half-life15-30mins or 8hr?.
BioAv low, poor water solubility
Pathways:
- usually induce ROS production in cancer cells, and reduce ROS in normal cells.
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓,
- Lowers AntiOxidant defense in Cancer Cells: NRF2↓, TrxR↓**, SOD↓, GSH↓ Catalase↓ GPx4↓
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, p38↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, EMT↓, MMPs↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, IGF-1↓, uPA↓, VEGF↓, FAK↓, NF-κB↓, TGF-β↓, ERK↓
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑, cyclin D1↓, cyclin E↓, CDK2↓, CDK4↓,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, FAK↓, ERK↓, EMT↓,
- inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, cMyc↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, LDHA↓, HK2↓, PFKs↓, PDKs↓, ECAR↓, OXPHOS↓, GRP78↑, GlucoseCon↓
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, EGFR↓, Integrins↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, JAK↓, STAT↓, β-catenin↓, AMPK, ERK↓, JNK, P53↑,
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, RadioSensitizer, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive, Renoprotection, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells
Rank Pathway / Target Axis Direction Primary Effect Notes / Cancer Relevance
1 PKM2-mediated aerobic glycolysis (Warburg metabolism) Energy / biomass restriction Key, repeatedly reported mechanism: shikonin suppresses PKM2 activity and PKM2-driven glycolysis in multiple tumor models, with downstream growth inhibition and apoptosis
2 ROS accumulation / oxidative stress ↑ ROS Redox overload Common upstream trigger that drives mitochondrial dysfunction and regulated cell death programs; often precedes necroptosis/apoptosis signaling
3 Necroptosis core cascade (RIPK1 → RIPK3 → MLKL) Programmed necrotic cell death Strong evidence across cancers (e.g., leukemia and nasopharyngeal carcinoma): shikonin increases RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL expression/activation; necroptosis inhibitors can blunt the effect
4 Mitochondrial integrity (ΔΨm) Mitochondrial dysfunction ROS-linked depolarization; acts as a pivot into intrinsic apoptosis and other death programs
5 Intrinsic apoptosis (BAX/BAK → Caspase-9/3) Programmed cell death Frequently observed; often framed as ROS → mitochondrial damage → caspase-dependent apoptosis
6 PKM2/STAT3 signaling axis Reduced survival & proliferation signaling In ESCC and related models, shikonin suppresses PKM2-driven glycolysis and down-modulates STAT3 pathway activity
7 NF-κB pathway Reduced pro-survival transcription Reported as part of multi-target suppression of inflammatory/anti-apoptotic programs in several tumor models and reviews
8 PI3K–AKT (± mTOR) Growth & resistance pathway inhibition Often described as sensitizing cells to apoptosis/TRAIL; may be secondary to oxidative stress and metabolic collapse
9 Stress MAPKs (JNK / p38) Pro-death stress signaling Common downstream response to ROS; can reinforce apoptosis and other death outcomes
10 Ferroptosis-related axis (lipid peroxidation; GPX4) ↑ lipid perox / ↓ GPX4 Iron-dependent oxidative death Reported prominently for acetylshikonin (a shikonin derivative): ROS-associated lipid peroxidation with reduced GPX4 expression alongside RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL activation
11 Endoplasmic reticulum stress (UPR / ERS) Proteotoxic stress signaling Frequently mentioned in leukemia-focused mechanism summaries and broader reviews as contributory to growth arrest and death
12 Multiple regulated death programs (apoptosis / necroptosis / ferroptosis / pyroptosis) ↑ (context-dependent) Broader cell-death engagement Recent reviews emphasize that shikonin can engage several programmed cell death modalities depending on cell context and dosing
Rank Pathway / Target Axis Direction Primary Effect Notes / Cancer Relevance Ref
1 PKM2-mediated aerobic glycolysis (Warburg metabolism) ↓ PKM2 activity / ↓ glycolysis Energy & biomass restriction Demonstrates shikonin (and analogs) inhibit cancer glycolysis, reducing glucose consumption/lactate production via PKM2 targeting (ref)
2 PKM2 → STAT3 signaling axis ↓ PKM2-driven signaling / ↓ STAT3 pathway Reduced survival & proliferation ESCC study: shikonin suppresses PKM2-mediated aerobic glycolysis and regulates PKM2/STAT3 signaling (ref)
3 Necroptosis (RIPK1 → RIPK3 → MLKL) ↑ RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL Programmed necrotic cell death Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: shikonin induces necroptosis with upregulation of RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL (with ROS involvement) (ref)
4 ROS accumulation ↑ ROS Oxidative stress trigger Colon cancer model: shikonin increases intracellular ROS; ROS functions upstream of apoptosis (ref)
5 Mitochondrial apoptosis (Caspase-9/3) ↑ Caspase-9/3 Programmed cell death Same colon cancer study shows shikonin increases caspase-3 and caspase-9 activity (mitochondria-mediated apoptosis) (ref)
6 ER stress / UPR (PERK → eIF2α → CHOP) Proteotoxic stress apoptosis signaling Colon cancer: shikonin-induced apoptosis mediated by PERK/eIF2α/CHOP ER-stress pathway (ref)
7 Autophagic flux (autophagosome–lysosome completion) ↓ autophagic flux (blocked) ROS + apoptosis amplification Colorectal cancer: shikonin induces ROS and apoptosis by inhibiting autophagic flux (ref)
8 NF-κB signaling ↓ NF-κB activity Reduced pro-survival transcription Pancreatic cancer xenograft/mechanistic study: shikonin suppresses NF-κB activity and NF-κB–regulated gene products (ref)
9 PI3K–AKT–mTOR (stemness / chemoresistance axis) ↓ PI3K/AKT/mTOR Reduced survival & stemness Chemoresistant lung cancer CSC context: shikonin attenuates PI3K–Akt–mTOR pathway and reduces cancer stemness (ref)
10 Cell cycle control (p21; G2/M arrest) ↑ p21 / ↑ G2/M arrest Proliferation block Gastric cancer (AGS): shikonin induces cell-cycle arrest linked to p21 regulation (ref)
11 Invasion / metastasis programs (NF-κB-linked) ↓ invasion Anti-invasive phenotype Reports shikonin inhibits tumor invasion via down-regulation of NF-κB–related mechanisms in a high-metastatic tumor model (ref)
12 Chemosensitization via glycolysis suppression ↓ glycolysis / ↑ cisplatin sensitivity Combination benefit NSCLC: shikonin inhibits glycolysis and sensitizes cells to cisplatin (explicitly connecting metabolic suppression to chemosensitization) (ref)


Warburg, Warburg Effect: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type: effect

The Warburg effect (aerobic glycolysis) is a metabolic phenotype where many cancer cells use high glycolytic flux and lactate production even when oxygen is available. Tumors often contain hypoxic regions that further drive glycolysis, but Warburg metabolism can also occur under normoxic conditions (“pseudo-hypoxia”) via oncogenic signaling and metabolic rewiring.

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) is one important driver in hypoxic tumor regions. HIF-1α upregulates glycolytic genes (e.g., GLUT1, HK2, LDHA) and promotes reduced mitochondrial pyruvate oxidation in part through induction of PDK (which inhibits PDH), shifting carbon toward lactate.

Warburg effect (GLUT1, LDHA, HK2, and PKM2).
Classic HIF-Warburg axis: PDK1 and MCT4 (SLC16A3) (pyruvate gate + lactate export).

Here are some of the key pathways and potential targets:

Note: use database Filter to find inhibitors: Ex pick target HIF1α, and effect direction ↓

1.Glycolysis Inhibitors:(2-DG, 3-BP)
- HK2 Inhibitors: such as 2-deoxyglucose, can reduce glycolysis
-PFK1 Inhibitors: such as PFK-158, can reduce glycolysis
-PFKFB Inhibitors:
- PKM2 Inhibitors: (Shikonin)
-Can reduce glycolysis
- LDH Inhibitors: (Gossypol, FX11)
-Reducing the conversion of pyruvate to lactate.
-Inhibiting the production of ATP and NADH.
- GLUT1 Inhibitors: (phloretin, WZB117)
-A key transporter involved in glucose uptake.
-GLUT3 Inhibitors:
- PDK1 Inhibitors: (dichloroacetate)
- A key enzyme involved in the regulation of glycolysis. PDK inhibitors (e.g., DCA) activate PDH and shift pyruvate into TCA/OXPHOS, reducing lactate pressure.

2.Pentose phosphate pathway:
- G6PD Inhibitors: can reduce the pentose phosphate pathway

3.Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1α) pathway:
- HIF1α inhibitors: (PX-478,Shikonin)
-Reduce expression of glycolytic genes and inhibit cancer cell growth.

4.AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway:
-AMPK activators: (metformin,AICAR,berberine)
-Can increase AMPK activity and inhibit cancer cell growth.

5.mTOR pathway:
- mTOR inhibitors:(rapamycin,everolimus)
-Can reduce mTOR activity and inhibit cancer cell growth.

Warburg Targeting Matrix (Cancer Metabolism)

Node What It Does (Warburg role) Representative Inhibitors / Modulators Mechanism Snapshot Typical Tumor Effects Best-Fit Tumor Context Common Constraints / Gotchas TSF Combination Logic
GLUT (glucose uptake)
GLUT1 (SLC2A1) focus
Controls glucose entry; sets the upper bound on glycolytic flux. Research/repurposing: WZB117 (GLUT1), BAY-876 (GLUT1), STF-31 (GLUT1 tool), Fasentin (GLUT), Phloretin (broad, weak)
Dietary/indirect: some polyphenols reported to lower GLUT1 expression (context)
Blocks glucose transport or reduces GLUT1 expression → less substrate for glycolysis & PPP. ATP stress (in highly glycolytic tumors), lactate ↓, growth slowdown; can sensitize to stressors. High-GLUT1 tumors; hypoxic / glycolysis-addicted phenotypes. Systemic glucose handling and glucose-dependent tissues; tumor compensation via alternate fuels. P, R Pairs with ROS/ETC stressors or LDH/MCT blockade; beware compensatory glutaminolysis/fatty acid oxidation.
Hexokinase (HK2)
first committed glycolysis step
Traps glucose as G-6-P; HK2 often upregulated and mitochondria-associated in tumors. Clinical/adjunct interest: 2-Deoxyglucose (2-DG; glycolysis + glycosylation stress)
Research: Lonidamine-class glycolysis axis drugs (not “pure HK2”), 3-bromopyruvate (hazardous research agent; not for casual use)
Competitive substrate mimic (2-DG) → 2-DG-6P accumulation; HK flux ↓; ER glycosylation stress ↑. ATP ↓, AMPK ↑, ER stress/UPR ↑, autophagy ↑, apoptosis (context); radiosensitization reported. Highly glycolytic tumors; tumors with strong HK2 dependence; hypoxic cores. Normal glucose-dependent tissues; ER-stress toxicities; dosing/tolerability limits in practice. P, R, G Pairs with radiation, pro-oxidant stress, or MCT/LDH blockade; watch systemic glucose effects.
LDH (LDHA/LDHB)
pyruvate ⇄ lactate
Regenerates NAD+ to sustain glycolysis; LDHA supports lactate production and acidification. Tier A direct inhibitors: FX11, (R)-GNE-140, NCI-006, Oxamate, Galloflavin, Gossypol
Tier B indirect: polyphenols (often lactate/LDH expression ↓ rather than catalytic inhibition)
Blocks LDH catalysis → NAD+ recycling ↓ → glycolysis throttles; pyruvate handling shifts; redox pressure ↑. Lactate ↓, glycolytic flux ↓, oxidative stress ↑ (often secondary), growth inhibition; immune microenvironment may improve if lactate decreases. LDHA-high tumors; lactate-driven immunosuppression; glycolysis-addicted phenotypes. Metabolic plasticity: tumors switch fuels; some LDH inhibitors have PK liabilities; “LDH release” ≠ LDH inhibition. R, G Pairs with MCT inhibition (trap lactate), NAD+ axis inhibitors, immune therapy (lactate suppression logic), and OXPHOS stressors (context).
MCT (lactate transport)
MCT1 (SLC16A1), MCT4 (SLC16A3)
Exports lactate + H+ (acidifies TME); enables lactate shuttling between tumor subclones. Clinical-stage: AZD3965 (MCT1 inhibitor; clinical trials)
Research: AR-C155858 (MCT1/2), Syrosingopine (MCT1/4; repurposed), Lonidamine (MCT + MPC axis)
Blocks lactate export/import → intracellular acid stress ↑ (in glycolytic cells) and lactate shuttling ↓. Acid stress, growth inhibition; may improve immune function by reducing lactate/acidic suppression (context). MCT1-high tumors; oxidative “lactate-using” tumor fractions; tumors with lactate shuttling. MCT4-driven export can bypass MCT1-only inhibitors; hypoxia upregulates MCT4; need target matching. P, R Pairs strongly with LDH inhibitors (cut production + block export), and with immune therapy rationale (lactate/acid microenvironment).
PDK (PDK1-4)
PDH gatekeeper
PDK inhibits PDH → keeps pyruvate out of mitochondria; supports Warburg by favoring lactate. Prototype: Dichloroacetate (DCA; pan-PDK inhibitor “classic”)
Research: AZD7545 (PDK2 inhibitor; tool), newer PDK inhibitor series (research)
Inhibits PDK → PDH active ↑ → pyruvate into TCA/OXPHOS ↑; lactate pressure ↓. Warburg reversal pressure (context), lactate ↓, mitochondrial flux ↑; can increase ROS in some settings (secondary). PDK-high tumors; tumors with suppressed PDH flux; “glycolysis locked” metabolic phenotype. Requires functional mitochondrial capacity; hypoxia can limit OXPHOS shift; effect is often modulatory rather than directly cytotoxic. R, G Pairs with therapies that exploit mitochondrial dependence or redox stress; can complement LDH/MCT strategies by reducing lactate drive.

Time-Scale Flag (TSF): P / R / G

  • P: 0–30 min (direct transport/enzyme flux effects begin)
  • R: 30 min–3 hr (acute ATP/NAD+/acid stress and signaling changes)
  • G: >3 hr (gene adaptation, phenotype outcomes, immune/TME effects)


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
2356- SK,    ESM1 enhances fatty acid synthesis and vascular mimicry in ovarian cancer by utilizing the PKM2-dependent warburg effect within the hypoxic tumor microenvironment
- in-vitro, Ovarian, CaOV3 - in-vitro, Ovarian, OV90 - in-vivo, NA, NA
PKM2↓, Shikonin effectively inhibits the molecular interaction between ESM1 and PKM2, consequently preventing the formation of PKM2 dimers and thereby inhibiting ovarian cancer glycolysis, fatty acid synthesis and vasculogenic mimicry.
Glycolysis↓, Shikonin inhibited glycolysis in OV90 cells
FASN↓,
lactateProd↓, In both CAOV3 and OV90 cells, the levels of lactic acid were significantly reduced in the ESM1 and Shikonin group when compared to the ESM1-overexpressing group
Warburg↓, Shikonin could repress the interaction between PKM2 and ESM1 and the formation of PKM2 dimers to attenuate OC migration and invasion and VM by driving the Warburg effect in vitro.
TumCG↓, Shikonin itself significantly inhibited tumor growth
VM↓, Shikonin significantly attenuates the OC growth and the VM of OC cells

2417- SK,    Shikonin inhibits the Warburg effect, cell proliferation, invasion and migration by downregulating PFKFB2 expression in lung cancer
- in-vitro, Lung, A549 - in-vitro, Lung, H446
TumCP↓, Shikonin treatment decreased the proliferation, migration, invasion, glucose uptake, lactate levels, ATP levels and PFKFB2 expression levels and increased apoptosis in lung cancer cells in a dose‑dependent manner.
TumCMig↓,
TumCI↓,
GlucoseCon↓,
lactateProd↓,
PFKFB2↓,
Warburg↓, shikonin inhibited the Warburg effect and exerted antitumor activity in lung cancer cells, which was associated with the downregulation of PFKFB2 expression.
GLUT1∅, while the expression levels of the other proteins (PDK1, GLUT1, PGK2, LDHA, PKM2, GLUT3, PDH and p-PDH) were not altered by shikonin treatment.
LDHA∅,
PKM2∅,
GLUT3∅,
PDH∅,

2185- SK,    Shikonin Inhibits Tumor Growth in Mice by Suppressing Pyruvate Kinase M2-mediated Aerobic Glycolysis
- in-vitro, Lung, LLC1 - in-vitro, Melanoma, B16-BL6 - in-vivo, NA, NA
Glycolysis↓, confirming the inhibitory effect of shikonin on tumor aerobic glycolysis
GlucoseCon↓, shikonin dose-dependently inhibited glucose uptake and lactate production in Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) and B16 melanoma cells
lactateProd↓,
PKM2↓, suppression of cell aerobic glycolysis by shikonin is through decreasing PKM2 activity
selectivity↑, shikonin treatment significantly promoted tumor cell apoptosis compared to untreated control cells.
Warburg↓, agreement with previous findings of shikonin as a Warburg effect inhibitor
TumVol↓, A significant reduction of tumor size (Fig. 7B) and weight (Fig. 7C) was observed when shikonin was injected at concentration of 1 or 10 mg/kg.
TumW↓,


* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 3

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Core Metabolism/Glycolysis

FASN↓, 1,   GlucoseCon↓, 2,   Glycolysis↓, 2,   lactateProd↓, 3,   LDHA∅, 1,   PDH∅, 1,   PFKFB2↓, 1,   PKM2↓, 2,   PKM2∅, 1,   Warburg↓, 3,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State

TumCG↓, 1,  

Migration

TumCI↓, 1,   TumCMig↓, 1,   TumCP↓, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature

VM↓, 1,  

Barriers & Transport

GLUT1∅, 1,   GLUT3∅, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance

selectivity↑, 1,  

Functional Outcomes

TumVol↓, 1,   TumW↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 20

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Total Targets: 0

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: Warburg, Warburg Effect
3 Shikonin
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:150  Target#:947  State#:%  Dir#:%
wNotes=on sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page