condition found tbRes List
SFN, Sulforaphane (mainly Broccoli): Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Sulforaphane is an isothiocyanate derived from glucoraphanin, a compound found predominantly in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and cabbage. It is well known for its potent antioxidant and detoxification properties and has gained significant attention for its potential chemopreventive and anticancer effects.

Summary
1.primarily attenuates both DNMTs and HDACs, individually suppressing DNA hypermethylation and histones deacetylation, ultimately upregulating NRF2 (best known for NRF2↑)
2.Antioxidant Activity:
• Nrf2 activation leads to the upregulation of a host of antioxidant and detoxification enzymes (e.g., glutathione S-transferase, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1, heme oxygenase-1), which in turn decrease oxidative stress and lower ROS levels.
3.Pro-oxidant Effects in Cancer Cells and Under High-Dose Conditions (>=10uM?)
• In certain cancer cell types or at higher concentrations, sulforaphane can paradoxically lead to an increase in ROS levels.
• The elevated ROS may overwhelm the cancer cells’ antioxidant defenses, leading to oxidative stress–mediated cell death (apoptosis).
• This context-dependent pro-oxidant effect has been explored for its potential in selectively targeting cancer cells while leaving normal cells less affected.

- Might not be a good candidate for pro-oxidant strategy depending on concentration >10uM?.
- Strong Activation of Nrf2 (best known for) at low to moderate concentrations, hence reduces oxidative stress in both cancer and normal cells.
- AMPK signaling activated by SFN, high concentrations of ROS are produced
- ROS generation also results in depletion of GSH levels
- HIF-1α and VEGF inhibitor
- Might be effective against cancer stem cells
- But I would not combine that with radiation, as Sulforaphane activates the anti-oxidant master regulator of cells.
- “I very much agree: Sulforaphane is a very good addition, even more when the choice is an anti-oxidant therapy”
- well known as HDAC inhibitor (typically 5-10um concentrations)
-A transient decrease in HDAC activity has also been observed in healthy humans 3 h after providing a daily 200 µM SFN dose, resulting in a plasma concentration of SFN metabolites of 0.1–0.2 µM.


Dose/Bioavailabilty information:
SFN at a daily dose of 2.2 µM/kg body weight, with a mean plasma level of 0.13 µM Sprout 127.6 grams = 205uM±19.9 content yields SFN 0.5 to 2uM in plasma.
However, it is important to consider that at lower doses, specifically 2.5 μM, SFN resulted in a slight increase in cell proliferation by 5.18–11.84% within a 6 to 48 h treatment window.
-A therapeutic dose starts at approx 60 grams of the sprouts.
-100 g of Broccoli sprouts contain about 15–20 mg of sulforaphane
–Organic Broccoli Sprout Powder (Health Ranger) – Avmacol® – NanoPSA (a blend of NanoStilbene™ and Broccoli Sprout Extract).
- -750 mg Sulforaphane Glucosinolate in Daily One Serving (2 capsules) (30mg Sulforaphane)

Total sulforaphane metabolite concentration in plasma was the highest (>2 μM) at 3 h in human subjects who consumed fresh broccoli sprouts (40g)
-human studies with broccoli sprouts or extracts report plasma sulforaphane levels in the low micromolar range (typically 1–2 µM) after ingesting realistic, food-based quantities of sprouts (often in the range of 30–50 g of sprouts or a concentrated extract).

BroccoSprouts are young broccoli sprouts that have garnered attention because they contain high amounts of glucoraphanin—a precursor molecule to sulforaphane. Studies have shown that broccoli sprouts can have sulforaphane precursor levels (i.e., glucoraphanin levels) that are 10 to 100 times higher than those found in mature broccoli heads. Glucoraphanin content in broccoli sprouts can range anywhere from about 30 to over 100 mg per 100 grams of fresh sprouts. Once activated (e.g., during consumption when myrosinase acts on glucoraphanin), these levels translate into a significant sulforaphane yield, meaning that even a small amount of broccoli sprouts can deliver a potent dose of this bioactive compound.

Importantly, glucoraphanin itself is not bioactive. Rather, enzymatic hydrolysis by myrosinase, present in the plant tissue or in the mammalian microbiome, is necessary to form the active component, SFN.
- GFN (glucoraphanin) is hydrolyzed in vivo to SFN via the myrosinase, which is present in gut bacteria as well as the plant itself (also in Radish)
- Do not cook the vegetables, or if you do add myrosinase back in by adding radish.
- mild heat of broccoli (60–70 °C) inactivated ESP and preserved myrosinase and increased SF yield 3–7-fold
- chewing of fresh broccoli sprouts increases the interaction of glucosinolates with myrosinase and consequently, increases the bioavailability of SFN in the body

-Note half-life 2-3 hrs.
BioAv is good (15-80%) but requires myrosinase
Pathways:
- induce ROS production
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Lowers AntiOxidant defense in Cancer Cells: NRF2↓(contrary, actually most raises NRF2), TrxR↓**, GSH↓, Catalase↓(contrary), HO1↓(contrary), GPx↓
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, p38↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, EMT↓, MMPs↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, IGF-1↓, VEGF↓, ROCK1↓, FAK↓, RhoA↓, NF-κB↓, CXCR4↓, α-SMA↓, ERK↓
- reactivate genes thereby inhibiting cancer cell growth : HDAC↓, DNMTs↓, EZH2↓, P53↑, HSP↓, Sp proteins↓,
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑, cyclin D1↓, cyclin E↓, CDK2↓, CDK4↓, CDK6↓,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓, FAK↓, ERK↓, EMT↓,
- inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, cMyc↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, LDHA↓, HK2↓, ECAR↓, OXPHOS↓, GRP78↑, GlucoseCon↓
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, Notch↓, PDGF↓, EGFR↓, Integrins↓,
- inhibits Cancer Stem Cells : CSC↓, Hh↓, GLi↓, GLi1↓, CD133↓, β-catenin↓, sox2↓, notch2↓, nestin↓, OCT4↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, JAK↓, STAT↓, Wnt↓, β-catenin↓, AMPK, ERK↓, 5↓, - SREBP (related to cholesterol).
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, RadioSensitizer, RadioProtective, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive, Renoprotection, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells


ER Stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathway: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Protein expression of ATF, GRP78, and GADD153 which is a hall marker of ER stress.
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathway plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and responding to various stressors, including those encountered in cancer. When cells experience stress, such as the accumulation of misfolded proteins, they activate a series of signaling pathways collectively known as the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR aims to restore normal function by enhancing the protein-folding capacity of the ER, degrading misfolded proteins, and, if the stress is unresolved, triggering apoptosis.
The activation of ER stress pathways can contribute to resistance against chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Cancer cells may utilize the UPR to survive treatment-induced stress, making it challenging to achieve effective therapeutic outcomes.

-ER stress-associated proteins include: phosphorylation of PERK, eIF2α, ATF4, CHOP and cleaved-caspase 12



Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
3181- SFN,    Effect of sulforaphane on protein expression of Bip/GRP78 and caspase-12 in human hapetocelluar carcinoma HepG-2 cells
- in-vitro, HCC, HepG2
GRP78/BiP↑, SFN can up-regulate the expression of Bip/GRP78 and caspase-12,by which induce apoptosis of HepG-2 cells through the endoplasmic reticulum pathway.
Casp12↑,
Apoptosis↑,
ER Stress↑,

3180- SFN,    Exploring the therapeutic effects of sulforaphane: an in-depth review on endoplasmic reticulum stress modulation across different disease contexts
- Review, Var, NA
*cardioP↑, broad range of protective functions of sulforaphane, improving various diseases, such as cardiovascular, central nervous system, liver, eye, and reproductive diseases, as well as diabetes, cancer, gastroenteritis, and osteoarthritis,
*ER Stress↓, through the amelioration of ER stress in both in vivo and in vitro studies.
GRP78/BiP↑, Sulforaphane significantly increased the level of Bip/GRP78, and XBP-1 protein expression and enhanced the rate of HepG2 cells apoptosis.
XBP-1↑,
Apoptosis↑,
*NRF2↑, Mitigates oxidative stress and ER stress in vascular cells, contributing to cardioprotection
UPR↑, SFN can drive the UPR into an overactivated state(ai)

1458- SFN,    Sulforaphane Impact on Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Bladder Carcinoma
- Review, Bladder, NA
HDAC↓, SFN’s role as a natural HDAC-inhibitor is highly relevant
eff↓, SFN exerts stronger anti-proliferative effects on bladder cancer cell lines under hypoxia, compared to normoxic conditions
TumW↓, mice, SFN (52 mg/kg body weight) for 2 weeks reduced tumor weight by 42%
TumW↓, In another study a 63% inhibition was noted when tumor bearing mice were treated with SFN (12 mg/kg body weight) for 5 weeks
angioG↓,
*toxicity↓, In both investigations, the administration of SFN did not evoke apparent toxicity
GutMicro↝, SFN may protect against chemical-induced bladder cancer by normalizing the composition of gut microbiota and repairing pathophysiological destruction of the gut barrier,
AntiCan↑, A prospective study involving nearly 50,000 men indicated that high cruciferous vegetable consumption may reduce bladder cancer risk
ROS↑, Evidence shows that SFN upregulates the ROS level in T24 bladder cancer cells to induce apoptosis
MMP↓,
Cyt‑c↑,
Bax:Bcl2↑,
Casp3↑,
Casp9↑,
Casp8∅,
cl‑PARP↑,
TRAIL↑, ROS generation promotes tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) sensitivity
DR5↑,
eff↓, Blockade of ROS generation inhibited apoptotic activity and prevented Nrf2 activation in cells treated with SFN, pointing to a direct effect of ROS on apoptosis
NRF2↑, SFN potently inhibits carcinogenesis via activation of the Nrf2 pathway
ER Stress↑, endoplasmic reticulum stress evoked by SFN
COX2↓, downregulates COX-2 in T24 cells
EGFR↓, downregulation of both the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu
HER2/EBBR2↓,
ChemoSen↑, gemcitabine/cisplatin and SFN triggered pathway alterations in bladder cancer may open new therapeutic strategies, including a combined treatment regimen to cause additive effects.
NF-kB↓,
TumCCA?, cell cycle at the G2/M phase
p‑Akt↓,
p‑mTOR↓,
p70S6↓,
p19↑, p19 and p21, are elevated under SFN
P21↑,
CD44↓, CD44s expression correlates with induced intracellular levels of ROS in bladder cancer cells variants v3–v7 on bladder cancer cells following SFN exposure

1482- SFN,    Sulforaphane induces apoptosis in T24 human urinary bladder cancer cells through a reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial pathway: the involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress and the Nrf2 signaling pathway
- in-vitro, Bladder, T24
tumCV↓,
Apoptosis↑,
Cyt‑c↑,
Bax:Bcl2↑, Bcl-2/Bax dysregulation
Casp9↑,
Casp3↑,
Casp8∅,
cl‑PARP↑,
ROS↑, sulforaphane triggered reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation
MMP↓,
eff↓, blockage of sulforaphane-induced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and apoptosis, was strongly attenuated by the ROS scavenger N-acetyl-L-cysteine.
ER Stress↑,
p‑NRF2↑, accumulation of phosphorylated Nrf2 proteins in the nucleus
HO-1↑, induction of heme oxygenase-1 expression

1480- SFN,    Sulforaphane Induces Cell Death Through G2/M Phase Arrest and Triggers Apoptosis in HCT 116 Human Colon Cancer Cells
- in-vitro, CRC, HCT116
tumCV↓,
TumCCA↑, G2/M phase arrest
Apoptosis↑,
cycA1↑,
CycB↑,
CDC25↓, Cdc 25C
CDK1↓,
ROS↑, SFN induced the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
eff↓, Ca[Formula: see text] and decreased mitochondria membrane potential and increased caspase-8, -9 and -3 activities in HCT 116 cell
Cyt‑c↑,
AIF↑,
ER Stress↑,


* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 5

Results for Effect on Cancer/Diseased Cells:
AIF↑,1,   p‑Akt↓,1,   angioG↓,1,   AntiCan↑,1,   Apoptosis↑,4,   Bax:Bcl2↑,2,   Casp12↑,1,   Casp3↑,2,   Casp8∅,2,   Casp9↑,2,   CD44↓,1,   CDC25↓,1,   CDK1↓,1,   ChemoSen↑,1,   COX2↓,1,   cycA1↑,1,   CycB↑,1,   Cyt‑c↑,3,   DR5↑,1,   eff↓,4,   EGFR↓,1,   ER Stress↑,4,   GRP78/BiP↑,2,   GutMicro↝,1,   HDAC↓,1,   HER2/EBBR2↓,1,   HO-1↑,1,   MMP↓,2,   p‑mTOR↓,1,   NF-kB↓,1,   NRF2↑,1,   p‑NRF2↑,1,   p19↑,1,   P21↑,1,   p70S6↓,1,   cl‑PARP↑,2,   ROS↑,3,   TRAIL↑,1,   TumCCA?,1,   TumCCA↑,1,   tumCV↓,2,   TumW↓,2,   UPR↑,1,   XBP-1↑,1,  
Total Targets: 44

Results for Effect on Normal Cells:
cardioP↑,1,   ER Stress↓,1,   NRF2↑,1,   toxicity↓,1,  
Total Targets: 4

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: ER Stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathway
5 Sulforaphane (mainly Broccoli)
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:156  Target#:103  State#:%  Dir#:%
wNotes=on sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page