condition found tbRes List
SFN, Sulforaphane (mainly Broccoli): Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Sulforaphane is an isothiocyanate derived from glucoraphanin, a compound found predominantly in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and cabbage. It is well known for its potent antioxidant and detoxification properties and has gained significant attention for its potential chemopreventive and anticancer effects.

Summary
1.primarily attenuates both DNMTs and HDACs, individually suppressing DNA hypermethylation and histones deacetylation, ultimately upregulating NRF2 (best known for NRF2↑)
2.Antioxidant Activity:
• Nrf2 activation leads to the upregulation of a host of antioxidant and detoxification enzymes (e.g., glutathione S-transferase, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1, heme oxygenase-1), which in turn decrease oxidative stress and lower ROS levels.
3.Pro-oxidant Effects in Cancer Cells and Under High-Dose Conditions (>=10uM?)
• In certain cancer cell types or at higher concentrations, sulforaphane can paradoxically lead to an increase in ROS levels.
• The elevated ROS may overwhelm the cancer cells’ antioxidant defenses, leading to oxidative stress–mediated cell death (apoptosis).
• This context-dependent pro-oxidant effect has been explored for its potential in selectively targeting cancer cells while leaving normal cells less affected.

- Might not be a good candidate for pro-oxidant strategy depending on concentration >10uM?.
- Strong Activation of Nrf2 (best known for) at low to moderate concentrations, hence reduces oxidative stress in both cancer and normal cells.
- AMPK signaling activated by SFN, high concentrations of ROS are produced
- ROS generation also results in depletion of GSH levels
- HIF-1α and VEGF inhibitor
- Might be effective against cancer stem cells
- But I would not combine that with radiation, as Sulforaphane activates the anti-oxidant master regulator of cells.
- “I very much agree: Sulforaphane is a very good addition, even more when the choice is an anti-oxidant therapy”
- well known as HDAC inhibitor (typically 5-10um concentrations)
-A transient decrease in HDAC activity has also been observed in healthy humans 3 h after providing a daily 200 µM SFN dose, resulting in a plasma concentration of SFN metabolites of 0.1–0.2 µM.


Dose/Bioavailabilty information:
SFN at a daily dose of 2.2 µM/kg body weight, with a mean plasma level of 0.13 µM Sprout 127.6 grams = 205uM±19.9 content yields SFN 0.5 to 2uM in plasma.
However, it is important to consider that at lower doses, specifically 2.5 μM, SFN resulted in a slight increase in cell proliferation by 5.18–11.84% within a 6 to 48 h treatment window.
-A therapeutic dose starts at approx 60 grams of the sprouts.
-100 g of Broccoli sprouts contain about 15–20 mg of sulforaphane
–Organic Broccoli Sprout Powder (Health Ranger) – Avmacol® – NanoPSA (a blend of NanoStilbene™ and Broccoli Sprout Extract).
- -750 mg Sulforaphane Glucosinolate in Daily One Serving (2 capsules) (30mg Sulforaphane)

Total sulforaphane metabolite concentration in plasma was the highest (>2 μM) at 3 h in human subjects who consumed fresh broccoli sprouts (40g)
-human studies with broccoli sprouts or extracts report plasma sulforaphane levels in the low micromolar range (typically 1–2 µM) after ingesting realistic, food-based quantities of sprouts (often in the range of 30–50 g of sprouts or a concentrated extract).

BroccoSprouts are young broccoli sprouts that have garnered attention because they contain high amounts of glucoraphanin—a precursor molecule to sulforaphane. Studies have shown that broccoli sprouts can have sulforaphane precursor levels (i.e., glucoraphanin levels) that are 10 to 100 times higher than those found in mature broccoli heads. Glucoraphanin content in broccoli sprouts can range anywhere from about 30 to over 100 mg per 100 grams of fresh sprouts. Once activated (e.g., during consumption when myrosinase acts on glucoraphanin), these levels translate into a significant sulforaphane yield, meaning that even a small amount of broccoli sprouts can deliver a potent dose of this bioactive compound.

Importantly, glucoraphanin itself is not bioactive. Rather, enzymatic hydrolysis by myrosinase, present in the plant tissue or in the mammalian microbiome, is necessary to form the active component, SFN.
- GFN (glucoraphanin) is hydrolyzed in vivo to SFN via the myrosinase, which is present in gut bacteria as well as the plant itself (also in Radish)
- Do not cook the vegetables, or if you do add myrosinase back in by adding radish.
- mild heat of broccoli (60–70 °C) inactivated ESP and preserved myrosinase and increased SF yield 3–7-fold
- chewing of fresh broccoli sprouts increases the interaction of glucosinolates with myrosinase and consequently, increases the bioavailability of SFN in the body

-Note half-life 2-3 hrs.
BioAv is good (15-80%) but requires myrosinase
Pathways:
- induce ROS production
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP, HSP↓, Prx,
- Lowers AntiOxidant defense in Cancer Cells: NRF2↓(contrary, actually most raises NRF2), TrxR↓**, GSH↓, Catalase↓(contrary), HO1↓(contrary), GPx↓
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, p38↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, EMT↓, MMPs↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, IGF-1↓, VEGF↓, ROCK1↓, FAK↓, RhoA↓, NF-κB↓, CXCR4↓, α-SMA↓, ERK↓
- reactivate genes thereby inhibiting cancer cell growth : HDAC↓, DNMTs↓, EZH2↓, P53↑, HSP↓, Sp proteins↓,
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑, cyclin D1↓, cyclin E↓, CDK2↓, CDK4↓, CDK6↓,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓, FAK↓, ERK↓, EMT↓,
- inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, cMyc↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, LDHA↓, HK2↓, ECAR↓, OXPHOS↓, GRP78↑, GlucoseCon↓
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, Notch↓, PDGF↓, EGFR↓, Integrins↓,
- inhibits Cancer Stem Cells : CSC↓, Hh↓, GLi↓, GLi1↓, CD133↓, β-catenin↓, sox2↓, notch2↓, nestin↓, OCT4↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, JAK↓, STAT↓, Wnt↓, β-catenin↓, AMPK, ERK↓, 5↓, - SREBP (related to cholesterol).
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, RadioSensitizer, RadioProtective, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive, Renoprotection, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells


PARP, poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) cleavage: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage is a hallmark of caspase activation. PARP (Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) is a family of proteins involved in a variety of cellular processes, including DNA repair, genomic stability, and programmed cell death. PARP enzymes play a crucial role in repairing single-strand breaks in DNA.
PARP has gained significant attention, particularly in the treatment of certain types of tumors, such as those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. These mutations impair the cell's ability to repair double-strand breaks in DNA through homologous recombination. Cancer cells with these mutations can become reliant on PARP for survival, making them particularly sensitive to PARP inhibitors.
PARP inhibitors, such as olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib, have been developed as targeted therapies for cancers associated with BRCA mutations.

PARP Family:
The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are a family of enzymes involved in a number of cellular processes, including DNA repair, genomic stability, and programmed cell death.
PARP1 is the predominant family member responsible for detecting DNA strand breaks and initiating repair processes, especially through base excision repair (BER).

PARP1 Overexpression:
In several cancer types—including breast, ovarian, prostate, and lung cancers—elevated PARP1 expression and/or activity has been reported.
High PARP1 expression in certain cancers has been associated with aggressive tumor behavior and resistance to therapies (especially those that induce DNA damage).
Increased PARP1 activity may correlate with poorer overall survival in tumors that rely on DNA repair for survival.


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
1726- SFN,    Sulforaphane: A Broccoli Bioactive Phytocompound with Cancer Preventive Potential
- Review, Var, NA
Dose↝, Most clinical trials utilize doses of GFN ranging from 25 to 800 μmol , translating to about 65–2105 g raw broccoli or 3/4 to 23 cups of raw broccoli.
eff↝, SFN-rich powders have been made by drying out broccoli sprout
IL1β↓,
IL6↓,
IL12↓,
TNF-α↓,
COX2↓,
CXCR4↓,
MPO↓,
HSP70/HSPA5↓,
HSP90↓,
VCAM-1↓,
IKKα↓,
NF-kB↓,
HO-1↑,
Casp3↑,
Casp7↑,
Casp8↑,
Casp9↑,
cl‑PARP↑,
Cyt‑c↑,
Diablo↑,
CHOP↑,
survivin↓,
XIAP↓,
p38↑,
Fas↑,
PUMA↑,
VEGF↓,
Hif1a↓,
Twist↓,
Zeb1↓,
Vim↓,
MMP2↓,
MMP9↓,
E-cadherin↑,
N-cadherin↓,
Snail↓,
CD44↓,
cycD1↓,
cycA1↓,
CycB↓,
cycE↓,
CDK4↓,
CDK6↓,
p50↓,
P53↑,
P21↑,
GSH↑,
SOD↑,
GSTs↑,
mTOR↓,
Akt↓,
PI3K↓,
β-catenin/ZEB1↓,
IGF-1↓,
cMyc↓,

1723- SFN,    Sulforaphane as a potential remedy against cancer: Comprehensive mechanistic review
- Review, Var, NA
*NRF2↑, activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). In this way, the oxidative stress and other toxicants are diminished
ROS↑, Cytotoxic effects of SFN are delivered via complex mechanisms where ROS generation results in improving apoptosis
MMP↓, ROS generation is also followed by mitochondrial membrane potential disruption that results in cytochrome c cytosolic release cleaving the poly-ADP-ribose polymerase and apoptosi
Cyt‑c↑,
cl‑PARP↑,
Apoptosis↑,
AMPK↑, AMPK signaling activated by SFN, high concentrations of ROS are produced
GSH↓, SFN-induced ROS generation also results in depletion of GSH levels

2448- SFN,    Sulforaphane and bladder cancer: a potential novel antitumor compound
- Review, Bladder, NA
Apoptosis↑, Recent studies have demonstrated that Sulforaphane not only induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in BC cells, but also inhibits the growth, invasion, and metastasis of BC cells
TumCG↓,
TumCI↓,
TumMeta↓,
glucoNG↓, Additionally, it can inhibit BC gluconeogenesis
ChemoSen↑, demonstrate definite effects when combined with chemotherapeutic drugs/carcinogens.
TumCCA↑, SFN can block the cell cycle in G2/M phase, upregulate the expression of Caspase3/7 and PARP cleavage, and downregulate the expression of Survivin, EGFR and HER2/neu
Casp3↑,
Casp7↑,
cl‑PARP↑,
survivin↓,
EGFR↓,
HER2/EBBR2↓,
ATP↓, SFN inhibits the production of ATP by inhibiting glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in BC cells in a dose-dependent manner
Glycolysis↓,
mt-OXPHOS↓,
AKT1↓, dysregulation of glucose metabolism by inhibiting the AKT1-HK2 axis
HK2↓,
Hif1a↓, Sulforaphane inhibits glycolysis by down-regulating hypoxia-induced HIF-1α
ROS↑, SFN can upregulate ROS production and Nrf2 activity
NRF2↑,
EMT↓, inhibiting EMT process through Cox-2/MMP-2, 9/ ZEB1 and Snail and miR-200c/ZEB1 pathways
COX2↓,
MMP2↓,
MMP9↓,
Zeb1↓,
Snail↓,
HDAC↓, FN modulates the histone status in BC cells by regulating specific HDAC and HATs,
HATs↓,
MMP↓, SFN upregulates ROS production, induces mitochondrial oxidative damage, mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization, cytochrome c release
Cyt‑c↓,
Shh↓, SFN significantly lowers the expression of key components of the SHH pathway (Shh, Smo, and Gli1) and inhibits tumor sphere formation, thereby suppressing the stemness of cancer cells
Smo↓,
Gli1↓,
BioAv↝, SFN is unstable in aqueous solutions and at high temperatures, sensitive to oxygen, heat and alkaline conditions, with a decrease in quantity of 20% after cooking, 36% after frying, and 88% after boiling
BioAv↝, It has been reported that the ability of individuals to use gut myrosinase to convert glucoraphanin into SFN varies widely
Dose↝, Excitingly, it has been reported that daily oral administration of 200 μM SFN in melanoma patients can achieve plasma levels of 655 ng/mL with good tolerance

1463- SFN,    Sulforaphane induces reactive oxygen species-mediated mitotic arrest and subsequent apoptosis in human bladder cancer 5637 cells
- in-vitro, Bladder, 5637
tumCV↓,
CycB↑, concomitant increased complex between cyclin B1 and Cdk1
p‑CDK1↑, of cyclin B1 and phosphorylation of Cdk1
Apoptosis↑,
Casp8↑,
Casp9↑,
Casp3↑,
cl‑PARP↑,
ROS↑, maximum level of ROS accumulation was observed 3h after sulforaphane treatment.
eff↓, ROS scavenger, N-acetyl-L-cysteine, notably attenuated sulforaphane-mediated apoptosis as well as mitotic arrest

1459- SFN,  Aur,    Auranofin Enhances Sulforaphane-Mediated Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hep3B Cells through Inactivation of the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway
- in-vitro, Liver, Hep3B - in-vitro, Liver, HepG2
eff↑, sulforaphane significantly enhanced auranofin-induced apoptosis by inhibiting TrxR activity and cell proliferation compared to either single treatment
TumCCA↑, Sub-G1 cells
Apoptosis↑,
MMP↓,
BAX↑,
cl‑PARP↑,
Casp3↑,
Casp8↑,
Casp9↑,
ROS↑, combined treatment induced excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
eff↓, treatment with N-acetyl-L-cysteine, a ROS scavenger, reduced combined treatment-induced ROS production and apoptosis.
PI3K↓,
Akt↓,
TrxR↓, treatment with either sulforaphane or auranofin alone at low concentrations weakly inhibit TrxR activity Combined treatment significantly reduced TrxR activity and cell viability
BAX↑,
Bcl-2∅,

1458- SFN,    Sulforaphane Impact on Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Bladder Carcinoma
- Review, Bladder, NA
HDAC↓, SFN’s role as a natural HDAC-inhibitor is highly relevant
eff↓, SFN exerts stronger anti-proliferative effects on bladder cancer cell lines under hypoxia, compared to normoxic conditions
TumW↓, mice, SFN (52 mg/kg body weight) for 2 weeks reduced tumor weight by 42%
TumW↓, In another study a 63% inhibition was noted when tumor bearing mice were treated with SFN (12 mg/kg body weight) for 5 weeks
angioG↓,
*toxicity↓, In both investigations, the administration of SFN did not evoke apparent toxicity
GutMicro↝, SFN may protect against chemical-induced bladder cancer by normalizing the composition of gut microbiota and repairing pathophysiological destruction of the gut barrier,
AntiCan↑, A prospective study involving nearly 50,000 men indicated that high cruciferous vegetable consumption may reduce bladder cancer risk
ROS↑, Evidence shows that SFN upregulates the ROS level in T24 bladder cancer cells to induce apoptosis
MMP↓,
Cyt‑c↑,
Bax:Bcl2↑,
Casp3↑,
Casp9↑,
Casp8∅,
cl‑PARP↑,
TRAIL↑, ROS generation promotes tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) sensitivity
DR5↑,
eff↓, Blockade of ROS generation inhibited apoptotic activity and prevented Nrf2 activation in cells treated with SFN, pointing to a direct effect of ROS on apoptosis
NRF2↑, SFN potently inhibits carcinogenesis via activation of the Nrf2 pathway
ER Stress↑, endoplasmic reticulum stress evoked by SFN
COX2↓, downregulates COX-2 in T24 cells
EGFR↓, downregulation of both the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu
HER2/EBBR2↓,
ChemoSen↑, gemcitabine/cisplatin and SFN triggered pathway alterations in bladder cancer may open new therapeutic strategies, including a combined treatment regimen to cause additive effects.
NF-kB↓,
TumCCA?, cell cycle at the G2/M phase
p‑Akt↓,
p‑mTOR↓,
p70S6↓,
p19↑, p19 and p21, are elevated under SFN
P21↑,
CD44↓, CD44s expression correlates with induced intracellular levels of ROS in bladder cancer cells variants v3–v7 on bladder cancer cells following SFN exposure

1456- SFN,    Sulforaphane regulates cell proliferation and induces apoptotic cell death mediated by ROS-cell cycle arrest in pancreatic cancer cells
- in-vitro, PC, MIA PaCa-2 - in-vitro, PC, PANC1
tumCV↓,
TumCP↓,
cl‑PARP↑,
cl‑Casp3↑,
TumCCA↑, accumulation in the sub G1 phase
ROS↑, SFN caused a considerable increase in ROS in MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells as compared to the control group
MMP↓, SFN increased ROS level and γH2A.X expression while decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm).
γH2AX↑,
eff↓, (NAC) was shown to reverse SFN-induced cytotoxicity and ROS level.
*toxicity↓, HUVECs, used as normal control cells, did not show significant inhibitory effects at SFN concentrations below 20 μM

1482- SFN,    Sulforaphane induces apoptosis in T24 human urinary bladder cancer cells through a reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial pathway: the involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress and the Nrf2 signaling pathway
- in-vitro, Bladder, T24
tumCV↓,
Apoptosis↑,
Cyt‑c↑,
Bax:Bcl2↑, Bcl-2/Bax dysregulation
Casp9↑,
Casp3↑,
Casp8∅,
cl‑PARP↑,
ROS↑, sulforaphane triggered reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation
MMP↓,
eff↓, blockage of sulforaphane-induced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and apoptosis, was strongly attenuated by the ROS scavenger N-acetyl-L-cysteine.
ER Stress↑,
p‑NRF2↑, accumulation of phosphorylated Nrf2 proteins in the nucleus
HO-1↑, induction of heme oxygenase-1 expression

1508- SFN,    Nrf2 targeting by sulforaphane: A potential therapy for cancer treatment
- Review, Var, NA
*BioAv↑, RAW: higher amounts were detected when broccoli were eaten raw (bioavailability equal to 37%), compared to the cooked broccoli (bioavailability 3.4%)
HDAC↓, Sulforaphane is able to down-regulate HDAC activity and induce histone hyper-acetylation in tumor cell
TumCCA↓, Sulforaphane induces cell cycle arrest in G1, S and G2/M phases,
eff↓, in leukemia stem cells, sulforaphane potentiates imatinib effect through inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin functions
Wnt↓,
β-catenin/ZEB1↓,
Casp12?, inducing caspases activation
Bcl-2↓,
cl‑PARP↑,
Bax:Bcl2↑, unbalancing the ratio Bax/Bcl-2
IAP1↓, down-regulating IAP family proteins
Casp3↑,
Casp9↑,
Telomerase↓, In Hep3B cells, sulforaphane reduces telomerase activity
hTERT↓, inhibition of hTERT expression;
ROS?, increment of ROS, induced by this compound, is essential for the downregulation of transcription and of post-translational modification of hTERT in suppression of telomerase activity
DNMTs↓, (2.5 - 10 μM) represses hTERT by impacting epigenetic pathways, in particular through decreased DNA methyltransferases activity (DNMTs)
angioG↓, inhibit tumor development through regulation of angiogenesis
VEGF↓,
Hif1a↓,
cMYB↓,
MMP1↓, inhibition of migration and invasion activities induced by sulforaphane in oral carcinoma cell lines has been associated to the inhibition of MMP-1 and MMP-2
MMP2↓,
MMP9↓,
ERK↑, inhibits invasion by activating ERK1/2, with consequent upregulation of E-cadherin (an invasion inhibitor)
E-cadherin↑,
CD44↓, downregulation of CD44v6 and MMP-2 (invasion promoters)
MMP2↓,
eff↑, ombination of sulforaphane and quercetin synergistically reduces the proliferation and migration of melanoma (B16F10) cells
IL2↑, induces upregulation of IL-2 and IFN-γ
IFN-γ↑,
IL1β↓, downregulation of IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-α, and GM-CSF
IL6↓,
TNF-α↓,
NF-kB↓, sulforaphane inhibits the phorbol ester induction of NF-κB, inhibiting two pathways, ERK1/2 and NF-κB
ERK↓,
NRF2↑, At molecular level, sulforaphane modulates cellular homeostasis via the activation of the transcription factor Nrf2.
RadioS↑, sulforaphane could be used as a radio-sensitizing agent in prostate cancer if clinical trials will confirm the pre-clinical results.
ChemoSideEff↓, chemopreventive effects of sulforaphane


* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 9

Results for Effect on Cancer/Diseased Cells:
Akt↓,2,   p‑Akt↓,1,   AKT1↓,1,   AMPK↑,1,   angioG↓,2,   AntiCan↑,1,   Apoptosis↑,5,   ATP↓,1,   BAX↑,2,   Bax:Bcl2↑,3,   Bcl-2↓,1,   Bcl-2∅,1,   BioAv↝,2,   Casp12?,1,   Casp3↑,7,   cl‑Casp3↑,1,   Casp7↑,2,   Casp8↑,3,   Casp8∅,2,   Casp9↑,6,   CD44↓,3,   p‑CDK1↑,1,   CDK4↓,1,   CDK6↓,1,   ChemoSen↑,2,   ChemoSideEff↓,1,   CHOP↑,1,   cMYB↓,1,   cMyc↓,1,   COX2↓,3,   CXCR4↓,1,   cycA1↓,1,   CycB↓,1,   CycB↑,1,   cycD1↓,1,   cycE↓,1,   Cyt‑c↓,1,   Cyt‑c↑,4,   Diablo↑,1,   DNMTs↓,1,   Dose↝,2,   DR5↑,1,   E-cadherin↑,2,   eff↓,7,   eff↑,2,   eff↝,1,   EGFR↓,2,   EMT↓,1,   ER Stress↑,2,   ERK↓,1,   ERK↑,1,   Fas↑,1,   Gli1↓,1,   glucoNG↓,1,   Glycolysis↓,1,   GSH↓,1,   GSH↑,1,   GSTs↑,1,   GutMicro↝,1,   HATs↓,1,   HDAC↓,3,   HER2/EBBR2↓,2,   Hif1a↓,3,   HK2↓,1,   HO-1↑,2,   HSP70/HSPA5↓,1,   HSP90↓,1,   hTERT↓,1,   IAP1↓,1,   IFN-γ↑,1,   IGF-1↓,1,   IKKα↓,1,   IL12↓,1,   IL1β↓,2,   IL2↑,1,   IL6↓,2,   MMP↓,6,   MMP1↓,1,   MMP2↓,4,   MMP9↓,3,   MPO↓,1,   mTOR↓,1,   p‑mTOR↓,1,   N-cadherin↓,1,   NF-kB↓,3,   NRF2↑,3,   p‑NRF2↑,1,   mt-OXPHOS↓,1,   p19↑,1,   P21↑,2,   p38↑,1,   p50↓,1,   P53↑,1,   p70S6↓,1,   cl‑PARP↑,9,   PI3K↓,2,   PUMA↑,1,   RadioS↑,1,   ROS?,1,   ROS↑,7,   Shh↓,1,   Smo↓,1,   Snail↓,2,   SOD↑,1,   survivin↓,2,   Telomerase↓,1,   TNF-α↓,2,   TRAIL↑,1,   TrxR↓,1,   TumCCA?,1,   TumCCA↓,1,   TumCCA↑,3,   TumCG↓,1,   TumCI↓,1,   TumCP↓,1,   tumCV↓,3,   TumMeta↓,1,   TumW↓,2,   Twist↓,1,   VCAM-1↓,1,   VEGF↓,2,   Vim↓,1,   Wnt↓,1,   XIAP↓,1,   Zeb1↓,2,   β-catenin/ZEB1↓,2,   γH2AX↑,1,  
Total Targets: 127

Results for Effect on Normal Cells:
BioAv↑,1,   NRF2↑,1,   toxicity↓,2,  
Total Targets: 3

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: PARP, poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) cleavage
9 Sulforaphane (mainly Broccoli)
1 Auranofin
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:156  Target#:239  State#:%  Dir#:%
wNotes=on sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page