Chrysin / GlucoseCon Cancer Research Results

CHr, Chrysin: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Chrysin is found in passion flower and honey. It is a flavonoid.
-To reach plasma levels that might more closely match the concentrations used in in vitro studies (typically micromolar), considerably high doses or advanced delivery mechanisms would be necessary.
Chrysin is widely summarized as modulating PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways in cancer.

Chrysin — Chrysin is a naturally occurring flavone-class flavonoid found in honey, propolis, passionflower, and several plants. Its oncology relevance is mainly preclinical: it shows multi-pathway anticancer activity in cell and animal models, but native oral chrysin has very poor systemic bioavailability and no established approved oncology use.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Suppression of PI3K/AKT survival signaling with downstream reduction in proliferation and survival programs.
  2. Induction of mitochondrial apoptosis through Bax/Bcl-2 shift, mitochondrial membrane potential loss, cytochrome c release, and caspase activation.
  3. Context-dependent ROS stress amplification in cancer cells, often linked to mitochondrial injury, ER stress, and apoptosis.
  4. ER stress / unfolded-protein-response activation leading to autophagy or stress-to-death coupling.
  5. Suppression of inflammatory, invasive, angiogenic, and metastatic signaling including NF-κB, MMPs, EMT, VEGF, and HIF-1α axes.
  6. Secondary antioxidant / NRF2-linked cytoprotection in some normal-cell or injury models, which is context-dependent and not necessarily anticancer-selective.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Native oral chrysin has very poor systemic exposure because of low aqueous solubility, extensive intestinal/hepatic glucuronidation and sulfation, and efflux; human oral bioavailability has been reported as extremely low, often summarized as below 1%. Formulation strategies such as nanoparticles, lipid systems, micelles, cyclodextrins, or structural analogues are commonly proposed for systemic translation.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Most anticancer studies use micromolar in-vitro concentrations that are unlikely to be reached in plasma after ordinary oral chrysin. Local intestinal exposure may be more plausible than systemic tumor exposure, but systemic anticancer claims should be treated as formulation-dependent.
LipoMicel may increase bioavailability

Clinical evidence status: Preclinical. Evidence is strong enough for mechanistic oncology interest in cell and animal models, including combination/sensitization studies, but there is no mature clinical oncology evidence establishing therapeutic benefit.

-Note half-life 2 hrs, BioAv very poor often <1%
Pathways:
Graphical Pathways

- may induce ROS production
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓
- May Lower AntiOxidant defense in Cancer Cells: NRF2↓, GSH↓ HO1↓
- May Raise AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓,
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, EMT↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, TIMP2, uPA↓, VEGF↓, ROCK1↓, FAK↓, RhoA↓, NF-κB↓, ERK↓
- reactivate genes thereby inhibiting cancer cell growth : HDAC↓, P53↑, HSP↓,
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑, cyclin D1↓, CDK2↓, CDK4↓,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, FAK↓, ERK↓, EMT↓, TOP1↓, TET1↓,
- inhibits glycolysis and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, cMyc↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, HK2↓, PDKs↓, HK2↓, GRP78↑, GlucoseCon
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, Notch↓, PDGF↓, EGFR↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, STAT↓, Wnt↓, AMPK↓, ERK↓, JNK, TrxR,
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, RadioSensitizer, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive, Renoprotection, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Chrysin Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 PI3K AKT survival signaling PI3K↓; AKT phosphorylation↓; survival signaling↓ R, G Growth and survival suppression Central hub mechanism reported across multiple tumor models; also supports chemosensitization.
2 Mitochondrial apoptosis MMP↓; Bax↑; Bcl-2↓; cytochrome c↑; caspase-9/3↑ ↔ or lower sensitivity R, G Intrinsic apoptosis execution One of the most consistent anticancer endpoints, usually downstream of stress and survival-pathway suppression.
3 Mitochondrial ROS stress ROS↑ (context-dependent); oxidative stress↑; lipid peroxidation↑ ROS↓ or antioxidant protection (context-dependent) P, R, G Stress amplification Direction is dose- and model-dependent; cancer models often show pro-oxidant stress, while normal injury models may show antioxidant behavior.
4 ER stress and UPR ER stress↑; GRP78↑; UPR↑; autophagy or apoptosis↑ R, G Stress-to-death coupling Important in several chrysin cancer models and in some drug-combination effects.
5 NF-κB inflammatory transcription NF-κB↓; COX-2↓; IL-6↓; TNF-α↓ Inflammatory injury signaling↓ R, G Anti-inflammatory and anti-survival signaling May contribute to reduced proliferation, invasion, and cytokine-driven tumor support.
6 Invasion EMT and MMPs EMT↓; MMP-2↓; MMP-9↓; uPA↓; migration↓; invasion↓ G Anti-invasive phenotype Mechanistically relevant for metastasis models but generally later and context-dependent.
7 Angiogenesis and HIF-1α VEGF signaling HIF-1α↓; VEGF↓; angiogenic output↓ G Anti-angiogenic support Reported in preclinical models; may overlap with oxidative stress and DNA damage response pathways.
8 Glycolysis and metabolic stress GLUT1↓; HK2↓; LDH↓; PDK1↓; lactate production↓; ATP↓ G Metabolic suppression Relevant but less central than apoptosis and survival signaling; strongest interpretation is model-dependent.
9 NRF2 antioxidant axis NRF2↓ or antioxidant defense↓ (model-dependent) NRF2↑; SOD↑; GSH↑; catalase↑ (context-dependent) R, G Context-dependent redox selectivity Potentially useful but also interpret carefully because NRF2 activation can be protective in normal cells and sometimes undesirable in cancer cells.
10 Chemosensitization and radiosensitization Drug-induced toxicity↑; apoptosis↑; resistance signaling↓ Chemoprotection reported in some injury models G Adjunct sensitization Promising preclinical adjunct signal, but not clinically established.
11 Clinical Translation Constraint Systemic exposure low after native oral dosing Dose and formulation constraints G Translation limitation Very poor oral bioavailability is the dominant practical constraint; formulation or local GI targeting is likely required.

Time-Scale Flag (TSF): P / R / G

  • P: 0–30 min (primary/physical–chemical effects; rapid signaling / phosphorylation shifts)
  • R: 30 min–3 hr (acute stress-response and redox signaling)
  • G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation and phenotype-level outcomes)


GlucoseCon, Glucose Consumption: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Glucose consumption is often elevated in cancer cells due to an increased reliance on glycolysis for energy production, even in the presence of oxygen. This phenomenon, known as the Warburg effect, is a metabolic shift that allows cancer cells to rapidly proliferate and survive in nutrient-poor environments.

The increased glucose consumption in cancer cells can be detected using positron emission tomography (PET) scans, which measure the uptake of a glucose analog labeled with a radioactive tracer.


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
2805- CHr,    Chrysin serves as a novel inhibitor of DGKα/FAK interaction to suppress the malignancy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
- in-vitro, ESCC, KYSE150 - in-vivo, ESCC, NA
FAK↓, chrysin significantly disrupted the DGKα/FAK signalosome to inhibit FAK-controlled signaling pathways and the malignant progression of ESCC cells both in vitro and in vivo
GlucoseCon↓, Chrysin significantly reduced the levels of glycolytic indexes, such as glucose uptake
Casp3↑, hrysin dose-dependently increased the apoptotic rate and caspase 3/7 activity in KYSE410, KYSE30, and KYSE150 cells.
Casp7↑,
p‑Akt↓, chrysin dose-dependently inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT
TumCG↓, chrysin dose-dependently reduced the growth of ESCC tumors
Weight∅, difference of body weight between chrysin treatment groups and control group is minimal

1143- CHr,    Chrysin inhibited tumor glycolysis and induced apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting hexokinase-2
- in-vitro, HCC, HepG2 - in-vivo, NA, NA - in-vitro, HCC, HepG3 - in-vitro, HCC, HUH7
HK2↓,
GlucoseCon↓,
lactateProd↓,
Glycolysis↓,
Apoptosis↑,

2782- CHr,    Broad-Spectrum Preclinical Antitumor Activity of Chrysin: Current Trends and Future Perspectives
- Review, Var, NA - Review, Stroke, NA - Review, Park, NA
*antiOx↑, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, neuroprotective
*Inflam↓, inhibitory effect of chrysin on inflammation and oxidative stress is also important in Parkinson’s disease
*hepatoP↑,
*neuroP↑,
*BioAv↓, Accumulating data demonstrates that poor absorption, rapid metabolism, and systemic elimination are responsible for poor bioavailability of chrysin in humans that, subsequently, restrict its therapeutic effects
*cardioP↑, cardioprotective [69], lipid-lowering effect [70]
*lipidLev↓,
*RenoP↑, Renoprotective
*TNF-α↓, chrysin reduces levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-2 (IL-2).
*IL2↓,
*PI3K↓, induction of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by chrysin contributes to a reduction in oxidative stress and inflammation during cerebral I/R injury
*Akt↓,
*ROS↓,
*cognitive↑, Chrysin (25, 50, and 100 mg/kg) improves cognitive capacity, inflammation, and apoptosis to ameliorate traumatic brain injury
eff↑, chrysin and silibinin is beneficial in suppressing breast cancer malignancy via decreasing cancer proliferation
cycD1/CCND1↓, chrysin and silibinin induced cell cycle arrest via down-regulation of cyclin D1 and hTERT
hTERT/TERT↓,
VEGF↓, Administration of chrysin is associated with the disruption of hypoxia-induced VEGF gene expression
p‑STAT3↓, chrysin is capable of reducing STAT3 phosphorylation in hypoxic conditions without affecting the HIF-1α protein level.
TumMeta↓, chrysin is a potent agent in suppressing metastasis and proliferation of breast cancer cells during hypoxic conditions
TumCP↓,
eff↑, combination therapy of breast cancer cells using chrysin and metformin exerts a synergistic effect and is more efficient compared to chrysin alone
eff↑, combination of quercetin and chrysin reduced levels of pro-inflammatory factors, such as IL-1β, Il-6, TNF-α, and IL-10, via NF-κB down-regulation.
IL1β↓,
IL6↓,
NF-kB↓,
ROS↑, after chrysin administration, an increase occurs in levels of ROS that, subsequently, impairs the integrity of the mitochondrial membrane, leading to cytochrome C release and apoptosis induction
MMP↓,
Cyt‑c↑,
Apoptosis↑,
ER Stress↑, in addition to mitochondria, ER can also participate in apoptosis
Ca+2↑, Upon chrysin administration, an increase occurs in levels of ROS and cytoplasmic Ca2+ that mediate apoptosis induction in OC cells
TET1↑, In MKN45 cells, chrysin promotes the expression of TET1
Let-7↑, Chrysin is capable of promoting the expression of miR-9 and Let-7a as onco-suppressor factors in cancer to inhibit the proliferation of GC cells
Twist↓, Down-regulation of NF-κB, and subsequent decrease in Twist/EMT are mediated by chrysin administration, negatively affecting cervical cancer metastasis
EMT↓,
TumCCA↑, nduction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via up-regulation of caspase-3, caspase-9, and Bax are mediated by chrysin
Casp3↑,
Casp9↑,
BAX↑,
HK2↓, Chrysin administration (15, 30, and 60 mM) reduces the expression of HK-2 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells to impair glucose uptake and lactate production.
GlucoseCon↓,
lactateProd↓,
Glycolysis↓, In addition to glycolysis metabolism impairment, the inhibitory effect of chrysin on HK-2 leads to apoptosis
SHP1↑, upstream modulator of STAT3 known as SHP-1 is up-regulated by chrysin
N-cadherin↓, Furthermore, N-cadherin and E-cadherin are respectively down-regulated and up-regulated upon chrysin administration in inhibiting melanoma invasion
E-cadherin↑,
UPR↑, chrysin substantially diminishes survival by ER stress induction via stimulating UPR, PERK, ATF4, and elF2α
PERK↑,
ATF4↑,
eIF2α↑,
RadioS↑, Irradiation combined with chrysin exerts a synergistic effect
NOTCH1↑, Irradiation combined with chrysin exerts a synergistic effect
NRF2↓, in reducing Nrf2 expression, chrysin down-regulates the expression of ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways—leading to an increase in the efficiency of doxorubicin in chemotherapy
BioAv↑, chrysin at the tumor site by polymeric nanoparticles leads to enhanced anti-tumor activity, due to enhanced cellular uptake
eff↑, Chrysin- and curcumin-loaded nanoparticles significantly promote the expression of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 to exert a reduction in melanoma invasion


Showing Research Papers: 1 to 3 of 3

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 3

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress

NRF2↓, 1,   ROS↑, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics

MMP↓, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis

GlucoseCon↓, 3,   Glycolysis↓, 2,   HK2↓, 2,   lactateProd↓, 2,  

Cell Death

p‑Akt↓, 1,   Apoptosis↑, 2,   BAX↑, 1,   Casp3↑, 2,   Casp7↑, 1,   Casp9↑, 1,   Cyt‑c↑, 1,   hTERT/TERT↓, 1,  

Protein Folding & ER Stress

eIF2α↑, 1,   ER Stress↑, 1,   PERK↑, 1,   UPR↑, 1,  

Cell Cycle & Senescence

cycD1/CCND1↓, 1,   TumCCA↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State

EMT↓, 1,   Let-7↑, 1,   NOTCH1↑, 1,   SHP1↑, 1,   p‑STAT3↓, 1,   TumCG↓, 1,  

Migration

Ca+2↑, 1,   E-cadherin↑, 1,   FAK↓, 1,   N-cadherin↓, 1,   TET1↑, 1,   TumCP↓, 1,   TumMeta↓, 1,   Twist↓, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature

ATF4↑, 1,   VEGF↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling

IL1β↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,   NF-kB↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance

BioAv↑, 1,   eff↑, 4,   RadioS↑, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers

hTERT/TERT↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes

Weight∅, 1,  
Total Targets: 46

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress

antiOx↑, 1,   ROS↓, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis

lipidLev↓, 1,  

Cell Death

Akt↓, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State

PI3K↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling

IL2↓, 1,   Inflam↓, 1,   TNF-α↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance

BioAv↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes

cardioP↑, 1,   cognitive↑, 1,   hepatoP↑, 1,   neuroP↑, 1,   RenoP↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 14

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: GlucoseCon, Glucose Consumption
3 Chrysin
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:61  Target#:623  State#:%  Dir#:%
wNotes=on sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page