| Features: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Iron plays a dual and highly context-dependent role in cancer biology. It is essential for tumor proliferation due to its requirement in DNA synthesis (ribonucleotide reductase), mitochondrial respiration, and cell cycle progression. Many cancers exhibit increased iron uptake (↑ transferrin receptor, TfR1) and decreased iron export (↓ ferroportin), leading to intracellular iron accumulation that supports rapid growth. However, excess labile iron also promotes oxidative stress through Fenton chemistry (Fe²⁺ + H₂O₂ → •OH), contributing to DNA damage and genomic instability. A major therapeutic concept is ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death driven by lipid peroxidation. Tumors with high iron dependency can be selectively vulnerable to ferroptosis induction. Conversely, chronic iron overload may promote tumor initiation through ROS-mediated mutagenesis and inflammatory signaling. Thus, iron sits at a metabolic intersection: -Pro-tumor when supporting proliferation and ROS-driven mutation -Anti-tumor when leveraged to trigger ferroptotic cell death Iron biology in cancer is best understood through three axes: -Iron uptake/storage/export balance -ROS and oxidative stress dynamics -Ferroptosis susceptibilityIron is a vital trace element that plays essential roles in various physiological processes. Its importance stems from its involvement in oxygen transport, energy production, DNA synthesis, and numerous enzymatic reactions. – Iron is a critical component of hemoglobin in red blood cells, enabling the binding and transport of oxygen from the lungs to tissues. – Iron participates in redox reactions due to its ability to alternate between ferrous (Fe²⁺) and ferric (Fe³⁺) states. Tumor cells often require increased iron to support their rapid proliferation and metabolic demands. – Elevated iron availability can promote DNA synthesis, cell division, and tumor growth. • Promotion of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Formation: – Iron’s redox-active nature, while important for normal cell functions, can also lead to the generation of reactive oxygen species via reactions such as the Fenton reaction: Fe²⁺ + H₂O₂ → Fe³⁺ + •OH + OH⁻ – The hydroxyl radicals (•OH) produced are highly reactive and can cause oxidative damage to cellular components (DNA, proteins, lipids). – This oxidative damage may contribute to genomic instability, mutations, and the progression of cancer. Cancer cells often exhibit increased iron dependency, targeting iron metabolism is a strategy that is being explored for cancer therapy. – Approaches include the use of iron chelators to sequester iron and limit its availability to tumor cells, thereby inhibiting their growth. – Alternatively, therapies may aim to exploit iron’s capacity to generate toxic ROS beyond a threshold that cancer cells can manage, leading to selective cell death. Iron (Fe) – Cancer Pathway Matrix
Time-Scale Flag (TSF): |
| Features: Therapy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Magnetic Fields — externally applied static or time-varying magnetic fields used to alter cellular signaling, redox state, ion handling, membrane behavior, metabolism, or neural activity without introducing a chemical agent. They are a physical therapeutic modality and include static magnetic fields (SMF), extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF), pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), and other non-rotating oscillating/time-varying magnetic fields. Common abbreviations include MF, SMF, ELF-MF, EMF, and PEMF. Biological effects are strongly dependent on field strength, frequency, waveform, gradient, duty cycle, exposure duration, and tissue or cell type. Rotating magnetic fields are excluded here because they are represented separately as pid 192; magnetic-nanoparticle-dependent magnetothermal or magnetomechanical effects are also better assigned primarily to the magnetic nanoparticle product. Primary mechanisms (ranked):
Bioavailability / PK relevance: Conventional pharmacokinetic concepts do not apply because the intervention is a physical field rather than an absorbed drug. Relevant exposure variables are magnetic flux density, field gradient, frequency, waveform, pulse width, repetition rate, duty cycle, spatial distribution, treatment duration and tissue depth. Magnetic fields can penetrate tissue without the concentration gradients characteristic of drugs, but induced electric fields and biological coupling vary markedly with geometry and frequency. In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Effects are not concentration-driven. Many experimental results cannot be generalized between devices because apparently small differences in waveform, frequency, flux density, orientation, gradient and exposure duration can change the biological response. Static fields ranging from millitesla to tesla and PEMF/ELF protocols ranging from weak fields to substantially stronger stimulation should therefore be treated as distinct exposure regimens rather than as a single dose-response continuum. Clinical evidence status: Cancer treatment remains predominantly preclinical, with cell-culture and animal evidence plus limited supportive or adjunctive human use. Evidence supports parameter-dependent anticancer effects and chemosensitization, but non-rotating magnetic-field exposure alone is not an established standard anticancer therapy. PEMF has established clinical use in several musculoskeletal applications and has been studied as supportive therapy in oncology. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has substantially stronger human evidence in neurological and psychiatric applications, including investigational use in Alzheimer’s disease, but should not be interpreted as evidence that generic magnetic-field exposure is an established systemic cancer treatment. Magnetic Fields can be Static, or pulsed. The most common therapy is a pulsed magnetic field in the uT or mT range.The main pathways affected are: Calcium Signaling: -influence the activity of voltage-gated calcium channels. Oxidative Stress and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Pathways Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) and Cellular Stress Responses Cell Proliferation and Growth Signaling: MAPK/ERK pathway. Gene Expression and Epigenetic Modifications: NF-κB Angiogenesis Pathways: VEGF (improving VEGF for normal cells) PEMF was found to have a 2-fold increase in drug uptake compared to traditional electrochemotherapy in rat melanoma models Pathways: - most reports have ROS production increasing in cancer cells , while decreasing in normal cells. - ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx, - Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑, - lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓ - inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, VEGF↓(mostly regulated up in normal cells), - cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑, - inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓, - inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, HK2↓, PFKs↓, PDKs↓, ECAR↓, OXPHOS↓, GRP78↑, Glucose↓, GlucoseCon↓ - inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, Notch↓, FGF↓, PDGF↓, EGFR↓, Integrins↓, - Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, STAT↓, Wnt↓, β-catenin↓, ERK↓, JNK, - SREBP (related to cholesterol). - Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, cytoProtective, RadioSensitizer, RadioProtective, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective, - Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells Magnetic Field Mechanisms in Cancer
P: 0–30 min R: 30 min–3 hr G: >3 hr MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.Alzheimer’s disease relevance: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive magnetic neuromodulation modality with randomized human evidence for modest improvement in global cognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. The strongest recent evidence supports excitatory stimulation of cortical cognitive-network regions, particularly the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The mechanism is principally neural-network and synaptic modulation rather than the systemic ROS-based mechanism often discussed for low-intensity PEMF. Meta-analyses generally report cognitive benefit, but protocol heterogeneity, small trials and uncertain durability remain important limitations. rTMS should therefore be classified as investigational or adjunctive for AD rather than an established disease-modifying treatment. Clinical evidence status: Multiple RCTs and meta-analyses support a modest short-term cognitive signal. Longer-term benefit remains less certain, optimal frequency/intensity/site protocols are not standardized, and evidence does not establish prevention or reversal of Alzheimer pathology. Magnetic Stimulation in Alzheimer’s Disease
P: 0–30 min R: 30 min–3 hr G: >3 hr |
| 1737- | MFrot, | Fe, | MF, | Feature Matching of Microsecond-Pulsed Magnetic Fields Combined with Fe3O4 Particles for Killing A375 Melanoma Cells |
| - | in-vitro, | MB, | A375 |
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers. Such Conditions may include : -low or high Dose -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations -different cell line effects -synergies with other products -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:% IllCat:% CanType:% Cells:% prod#:104 Target#:% State#:% Dir#:%
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid