condition found tbRes List
PBG, Propolis -bee glue: Click to Expand ⟱
Features: Compound
Brazilian Green Propolis often considered best
• Derived from Baccharis dracunulifolia, this type is rich in artepillin C.
• It has been widely researched for its anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties.
-Propolis common researched flavonoids :chrysin, pinocembrin, galangin, pinobanksin(Pinocembrin)
-most representative phenolic acids were caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, and ferulic acid, as well as their derivatives, DMCA and caffeic acid prenyl, benzyl, phenylethyl (CAPE), and cinnamyl esters
-One of the most studied active compounds of a poplar-type propolis is caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE)
-caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), galangin, chrysin, nemorosone, propolin G, artepillin C, cardanol, pinocembrin, pinobanksin, chicoric acid, and phenolic acids (caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and coumaric acid), as well as luteolin, apigenin, myricetin, naringenin, kaempferol, quercetin, polysaccharides, tannins, terpenes, sterols, and aldehydes -content highly variable based on location and extraction
Two main factors of interest:
1. affects interstitual fluild pH
2. high concentration raises ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species), while low concentration may reduce ROS

- Artepillin-C (major phenolic compounds found in Brazilian green propolis (BGP))
- caffeic acid major source

Do not combine with 2DG

Pathways:
-Propolis compounds (e.g., artepillin C, caffeic acid phenethyl ester [CAPE]) can trigger apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells.
-Propolis has been shown to inhibit NF‑κB activation.
-Propolis extracts can cause cell cycle arrest at specific checkpoints (e.g., G0/G1 or G2/M phases).
-Enhance the body’s antitumor immune responses, for example by activating natural killer (NK) cells and modulating cytokine profiles.

-Note half-life no standard, high variablity of content.
BioAv poor water solubility, and low oral bioavailability.
Pathways:
- high concentration may induce ROS production, while low concentrations mya low it. This may apply to both normal and cancer cells. Normal Cells Example. (Also not sure if high level are acheivable in vivo due to bioavailability)
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
SOD↓, GSH↓ Catalase↓ HO1↓ GPx↓ -->
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, EMT↓, MMPs↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, IGF-1↓, uPA↓, VEGF↓, ROCK1↓, FAK↓, RhoA↓, NF-κB↓, TGF-β↓, α-SMA↓, ERK↓
- reactivate genes thereby inhibiting cancer cell growth : HDAC↓, P53↑,
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑, cyclin D1↓, cyclin E↓, CDK2↓, CDK4↓, CDK6↓,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓, FAK↓, ERK↓, EMT↓, TOP1↓, TET1,
- inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, cMyc↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, LDHA↓, HK2↓, PFKs↓, PDKs↓, GRP78↑, GlucoseCon↓
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, STAT↓, β-catenin↓, AMPK, ERK↓, JNK,
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, RadioSensitizer, RadioProtective, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive, Renoprotection, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells


TumCMig, Tumor cell migration: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Tumor cell migration is a critical process in cancer progression and metastasis, which is the spread of cancer cells from the primary tumor to distant sites in the body.
Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
1651- CA,  PBG,    Caffeic acid and its derivatives as potential modulators of oncogenic molecular pathways: New hope in the fight against cancer
- Review, Var, NA
Apoptosis↑,
TumCCA↓, CAPE (1-80 uM) can stimulate apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (G1 phase
TumCMig↓,
TumMeta↓,
ChemoSen↑,
eff↑, Nanoparticles promote therapeutic effect of CA and CAPE in reducing cancer cell malignancy.
eff↑, improve capacity of CA and CAPE in cancer suppression, it has been co-administered with other anti-tumor compounds such as gallic acid
eff↓, Currently, solvent extraction is utilized by methanol and ethyl acetate combination at high temperatures. However, a low amount of CA is yielded via this pathway
eff↝, Decyl CA (DCA) is a novel derivative of CA but its role in affecting colorectal cancer has not been completely understood.
Dose∅, The CAPE administration (0-60 uM) induces both autophagy and apoptosis in C6 glioma cells.
AMPK↑, CAPE induces autophagy via AMPK upregulation.
p62↓, CAPE can induce autophagy via p62 down-regulation and LC3-II upregulation
LC3II↑,
Ca+2↑, CA (0-1000 uM) enhances Ca2+ accumulation in cells in a concentration-dependent manner
Bax:Bcl2↑, CA can promote Bax/Bcl-2 ratio i
CDK4↑, The administration of CAPE (1–80 μM) can stimulate apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (G1 phase) via upregulation of Bax, CDK4, CDK6 and Rb
CDK6↑,
RB1↑,
EMT↓, CAPE has demonstrated high potential in inhibiting EMT in nasopharyngeal caner via enhancing E-cadherin levels, and reducing vimentin and β-catenin levels.
E-cadherin↑,
Vim↓,
β-catenin/ZEB1↓,
NF-kB↓,
angioG↑, CAPE (0.01-1ug/ml) inhibited angiogenesis via VEGF down-regulation
VEGF↓,
TSP-1↑, and furthermore, CAPE is capable of increasing TSP-1 levels
MMP9↓, CAPE was found to reduce MMP-9 expression
MMP2↓, CAPE can also down-regulate MMP-2
ChemoSen↑, role of CA and its derivatives in enhancing therapy sensitivity of cancer cells.
eff↑, CA administration (100 uM) alone or its combination with metformin (10 mM) can induce AMPK signaling
ROS↑, CA can promote ROS levels to induce cell death in human squamous cell carcinoma
CSCs↓, CA can reduce self-renewal capacity of CSCs and their migratory ability in vitro and in vivo.
Fas↑, CAPE (0-100 uM) is capable of inducing Fas signaling to promote p53 expression, leading to apoptotic cell death via Bax and caspase activation
P53↑,
BAX↑,
Casp↑,
β-catenin/ZEB1↓, anti-tumor activity of CAPE is mediated via reducing β-catenin levels
NDRG1↑, CAPE (30 uM) can promote NDRG1 expression via MAPK activation and down-regulation of STAT3
STAT3↓,
MAPK↑, CAPE stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and ERK
ERK↑,
eff↑, Res, thymoquinone and CAPE mediate lung tumor cell death via Bax upregulation and Bcl-2 down-regulation.
eff↑, co-administration of CA (100 μM) and metformin (10 mM) is of interest in cervical squamous cell carcinoma therapy.
eff↑, in addition to CA, propolis contains other agents such as chrysin, p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid that are beneficial in tumor suppression.

3258- CHr,  PBG,    Chrysin Induced Cell Apoptosis and Inhibited Invasion Through Regulation of TET1 Expression in Gastric Cancer Cells
- in-vitro, GC, MKN45
TET1↑, Chrysin significantly promoted the expression of TET1 in GC cells
Apoptosis↑, Chrysin could noticeably induce cell apoptosis and inhibit cell migration and invasion
TumCI↓,
TumCMig↓,

2381- PBG,    Chinese Poplar Propolis Inhibits MDA-MB-231 Cell Proliferation in an Inflammatory Microenvironment by Targeting Enzymes of the Glycolytic Pathway
- in-vitro, BC, MDA-MB-231
TumCP↓, Propolis treatment obviously inhibited MDA-MB-231 cell proliferation, migration and invasion, clone forming, and angiogenesis.
TumCMig↓,
TumCI↓,
angioG↓,
TNF-α↓, (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, as well as NLRP3 inflammasomes, were decreased following propolis treatment when compared with the LPS group.
IL1β↓,
IL6↓,
NLRP3↓,
Glycolysis↓, Moreover, propolis treatment significantly downregulated the levels of key enzymes of glycolysis–hexokinase 2 (HK2), phosphofructokinase (PFK), pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme M2 (PKM2), and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) in MDA-MB-231 cells
HK2↓,
PFK↓,
PKM2↓,
LDHA↓,
ROS↑, propolis increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential.
MMP↓,

1231- PBG,    Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits MDA-MB-231 cell proliferation in inflammatory microenvironment by suppressing glycolysis and lipid metabolism
- in-vitro, BC, MDA-MB-231
TumCP↓,
TumCMig↓,
TumCI↓,
MMP↓,
TLR4↓,
TNF-α↓,
NF-kB↓,
IL1β↓,
IL6↓,
IRAK4↓,
GLUT1↓,
GLUT3↓,
HK2↓,
PFK↓,
PKM2↓,
LDHA↓,
ACC↓,
FASN↓,
eff↓, After adding the glycolysis inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), the inhibitory effects of CAPE on cell viability and migration were not significant when compared with the LPS group.

1663- PBG,    Propolis and Their Active Constituents for Chronic Diseases
- Review, Var, NA
NF-kB↓, CAPE (a bioactive constituent of propolis) was reported to have anticancer properties by inhibiting NF-κB, caspase and Fas signaling activation in MCF-7 cells
Casp↓,
Fas↓,
DNAdam↑, DNA fragmentation, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein homologous protein expression and caspase-3 activity
Casp3↑,
P53↝, Chinese propolis (EECP) and its bioactive constituents mainly persist due to regulation of the annexin A7 and p53 proteins, mitochondrial membrane potential and ROSs, as well as that inhibition of NF-κB causes apoptosis in cancer cells
MMP↝,
ROS↑, Herrera et al. and reported on the MDA-MB 231 tumor cell line, and the inhibitory effect of propolis was proposed to occur through the induction of mitochondrial dysfunction, resulting in ROS-associated necrosis
mtDam↑,
Dose?, A concentration of 100 μg/mL was able to attain 71% cytotoxicity
angioG↓, negative effect on angiogenesis, proliferation and migration of tumor cells. A concentration of 25–200 μg/mL noticeably inhibited the metastasis of breast cancer
TumCP↓,
TumCMig↓,
BAX↑,
selectivity↑, Negligible effect in fibroblasts
MMP↓, Cuban: Disturbed the mitochondrial potential, lactate dehydrogenase released, production of ROS and cell migration
LDH↓,
IL6↓, Chinese: Decreased cell tube generation, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α-like inflammatory mediators, glycolytic enzymes and mitochondrial potential. Promoted ROS generation
IL1β↓,
TNF-α↓,

1664- PBG,    Anticancer Activity of Propolis and Its Compounds
- Review, Var, NA
Apoptosis↑,
TumCMig↓,
TumCCA↑,
TumCP↓,
angioG↓,
P21↑, upregulating p21 and p27 expression
p27↑,
CDK1↓, thanol-extracted Cameroonian propolis increased the amount of DU145 and PC3 cells in G0/G1 phase, down-regulated cell cycle proteins (CDK1, pCDK1, and their related cyclins A and B)
p‑CDK1↓,
cycA1↓,
CycB↓,
P70S6K↓, Caffeic acid phenylethyl ester has been shown to inhibit the S6 beta-1 ribosomal protein kinase (p70S6K),
CLDN2↓, inhibition of NF-κB may be involved in the decrease of claudin-2 mRNA level
HK2↓, Chinese poplar propolis has been shown to significantly reduce the level of glycolysis at the stage of action of hexokinase 2 (HK2), phosphofructokinase (PFK), muscle isozyme pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA)
PFK↓,
PKM2↓,
LDHA↓,
TLR4↓, hinese propolis, as well as CAPE, inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation in the inflammatory microenvironment by inhibiting the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signal pathway
H3↓, Brazilian red propolis bioactive isoflavonoid, down-regulates the alpha-tubulin, tubulin in microtubules, and histone H3 genes
α-tubulin↓,
ROS↑, CAPE also affects the apoptotic intrinsic pathway by increasing ROS production
Akt↓, CAPE induces apoptosis by decreasing the levels of proteins related to carcinogenesis, including Akt, GSK3b, FOXO1, FOXO3a, NF-kB, Skp2 and cyclin D1
GSK‐3β↓,
FOXO3↓,
NF-kB↓,
cycD1↓,
MMP↓, It was found that chrysin caused a loss of mitochondria membrane potential (MMP) while increasing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels, and lipid peroxidation
ROS↑,
i-Ca+2↑,
lipid-P↑,
ER Stress↑, Chrysin also induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress by activating unfolded protein response proteins (UPR) such as PRKR-like ER kinase (PERK), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), and 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78)
UPR↑,
PERK↑,
eIF2α↑,
GRP78/BiP↑,
BAX↑, CAPE activated Bax protein
PUMA↑, CAPE also significantly increased PUMA expression
ROS↑, Northeast China causes cell apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells with increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduced mitochondrial membrane potential.
MMP↓,
Cyt‑c↑, release of cytochrome C from mitochondria to the cytoplasm is observed, as well as the activation of cleaved caspases (8, 9, and 3) and PARP
cl‑Casp8↑,
cl‑Casp8↑,
cl‑Casp3↑,
cl‑PARP↑,
eff↑, administration of Iranian propolis extract in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) significantly reduced the number of azaxymethane-induced aberrant crypt foci compared to 5-FU or propolis alone.
eff↑, Propolis may also have a positive effect on the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT). enhances the intracellular accumulation of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in human epidermoid carcinoma cells
RadioS↑, breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and supplemented with propolis had a statistically significant longer median disease-free survival time than the control group
ChemoSen↑, confirmed that propolis mouthwash is effective and safe in the treatment of chemo- or radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients.
eff↑, Quercetin, ferulic acid, and CAPE may also influence the MDR of cancer cells by inhibiting P-gp expression


* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 6

Results for Effect on Cancer/Diseased Cells:
ACC↓,1,   Akt↓,1,   AMPK↑,1,   angioG↓,3,   angioG↑,1,   Apoptosis↑,3,   BAX↑,3,   Bax:Bcl2↑,1,   Ca+2↑,1,   i-Ca+2↑,1,   Casp↓,1,   Casp↑,1,   Casp3↑,1,   cl‑Casp3↑,1,   cl‑Casp8↑,2,   CDK1↓,1,   p‑CDK1↓,1,   CDK4↑,1,   CDK6↑,1,   ChemoSen↑,3,   CLDN2↓,1,   CSCs↓,1,   cycA1↓,1,   CycB↓,1,   cycD1↓,1,   Cyt‑c↑,1,   DNAdam↑,1,   Dose?,1,   Dose∅,1,   E-cadherin↑,1,   eff↓,2,   eff↑,9,   eff↝,1,   eIF2α↑,1,   EMT↓,1,   ER Stress↑,1,   ERK↑,1,   Fas↓,1,   Fas↑,1,   FASN↓,1,   FOXO3↓,1,   GLUT1↓,1,   GLUT3↓,1,   Glycolysis↓,1,   GRP78/BiP↑,1,   GSK‐3β↓,1,   H3↓,1,   HK2↓,3,   IL1β↓,3,   IL6↓,3,   IRAK4↓,1,   LC3II↑,1,   LDH↓,1,   LDHA↓,3,   lipid-P↑,1,   MAPK↑,1,   MMP↓,5,   MMP↝,1,   MMP2↓,1,   MMP9↓,1,   mtDam↑,1,   NDRG1↑,1,   NF-kB↓,4,   NLRP3↓,1,   P21↑,1,   p27↑,1,   P53↑,1,   P53↝,1,   p62↓,1,   P70S6K↓,1,   cl‑PARP↑,1,   PERK↑,1,   PFK↓,3,   PKM2↓,3,   PUMA↑,1,   RadioS↑,1,   RB1↑,1,   ROS↑,6,   selectivity↑,1,   STAT3↓,1,   TET1↑,1,   TLR4↓,2,   TNF-α↓,3,   TSP-1↑,1,   TumCCA↓,1,   TumCCA↑,1,   TumCI↓,3,   TumCMig↓,6,   TumCP↓,4,   TumMeta↓,1,   UPR↑,1,   VEGF↓,1,   Vim↓,1,   α-tubulin↓,1,   β-catenin/ZEB1↓,2,  
Total Targets: 95

Results for Effect on Normal Cells:

Total Targets: 0

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: TumCMig, Tumor cell migration
6 Propolis -bee glue
1 Caffeic acid
1 Chrysin
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:137  Target#:326  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=on  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page